HemoChat is an evidence-based AI medical search tool covering all major clinical domains, powered by 46,298 SNOMED-CT concepts, clinical guidelines, and live PubMed literature.

What medical domains does HemoChat cover?

HemoChat covers all major medical domains including cardiology, oncology, neurology, hematology, pulmonology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, psychiatry, nephrology, rheumatology, musculoskeletal, and more — with 46,298 SNOMED-CT concepts.

Is HemoChat a replacement for clinical judgment?

No. HemoChat is for clinical reference only and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals for medical decisions.

What AI technology does HemoChat use?

HemoChat uses a hybrid GraphRAG + VectorRAG pipeline combining Neo4j knowledge graphs with FAISS vector search and an LLM for answer generation.

← Back to guidelines

Plastic Surgery87 papers

Infection of right breast implant

Last edited: 3 h ago

Overview

Infection of a right breast implant is a significant complication following breast augmentation or reconstruction procedures. It can lead to substantial morbidity, including implant failure, capsular contracture, and systemic infection if not promptly addressed. This condition primarily affects women who have undergone breast implant surgery, though it can occur in any patient with an implant. Early recognition and aggressive management are crucial to prevent long-term sequelae and ensure patient safety. Understanding the nuances of this infection is vital for clinicians to optimize patient outcomes in day-to-day practice. 7 1 3

Pathophysiology

Infection of a breast implant typically arises from bacterial contamination during surgery or post-operatively. The body initiates a robust foreign body response, characterized by the formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant. However, when bacteria are introduced, they can trigger an exaggerated inflammatory response. Gram-positive bacteria, particularly, have been implicated in increasing the risk of complications such as implant rupture and capsular contracture 7. The initial biofouling process involves fibrinogen and plasma proteins adhering to the implant surface, followed by macrophage activation and release of inflammatory cytokines like TGF-β. This cascade activates fibroblasts, leading to excessive collagen deposition and potentially encapsulating bacteria, which can evade immune clearance and perpetuate infection 3. Over time, this chronic inflammation can compromise implant integrity and lead to clinical manifestations requiring intervention.

Epidemiology

The incidence of breast implant infections varies but is generally reported to be around 1-2% in primary augmentation cases 7. Risk factors include surgical technique, patient factors such as smoking history, and pre-existing conditions like diabetes. Geographic variations and trends over time are less extensively documented, but there is a noted increase in awareness and reporting of complications, potentially inflating observed incidence rates. Age and sex distribution predominantly affect females undergoing cosmetic or reconstructive procedures, with no significant sex predilection noted beyond the demographic of female patients. 7 1 16

Clinical Presentation

Patients with infected breast implants often present with localized symptoms such as pain, swelling, redness, and warmth around the implant site. Systemic symptoms like fever, malaise, and chills may also be present, indicating a more severe infection. Atypical presentations can include subtle changes in breast contour, asymmetry, or unexplained implant displacement. Red-flag features include rapid onset of symptoms post-surgery, purulent drainage, and signs of systemic infection requiring urgent evaluation. Prompt recognition of these signs is crucial for timely intervention to prevent complications such as capsular contracture and implant failure 7.

Diagnosis

The diagnostic approach for infected breast implants involves a combination of clinical assessment and laboratory/imaging studies. Key steps include:

Clinical Evaluation: Detailed history and physical examination focusing on signs of infection.

Laboratory Tests:

- CBC: Elevated white blood cell count (WBC > 10,000/μL) 7 - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP): Elevated levels indicative of inflammation 7

Imaging:

- Ultrasound: Can reveal fluid collections, abscess formation, or implant displacement 7 - MRI: More sensitive for detecting subtle changes in capsule formation and fluid accumulation 7

Culture and Sensitivity: Aspiration of fluid from around the implant for bacterial culture and sensitivity testing 7

Differential Diagnosis:

Capsular Contracture: Typically presents with firmness and deformity without systemic symptoms 7

Implant Rupture: May present with sudden changes in breast shape or volume without signs of infection 7

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): Often presents with seroma accumulation and swelling, usually without overt signs of infection 7 8

Management

Initial Management

Antibiotic Therapy: Broad-spectrum antibiotics initially, tailored based on culture results (e.g., vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam) 7

Imaging-Guided Drainage: If abscess is present, guided aspiration or drainage under imaging 7

Surgical Intervention

Implant Removal: Often necessary, including complete capsulectomy to remove all infected material 7

Debridement: Removal of necrotic tissue and infected capsule 7

Reimplantation: Considered only after complete resolution of infection, typically requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy post-operatively 7

Monitoring and Follow-Up

Serial Lab Tests: Monitor ESR, CRP, and WBC counts 7

Imaging Follow-Up: Regular ultrasounds or MRIs to assess healing and implant stability 7

Contraindications:

Active systemic infection unresponsive to medical management 7

Severe comorbidities precluding surgery 7

Complications

Persistent Infection: Recurrent symptoms requiring repeated interventions 7

Capsular Contracture: Post-infection, increased risk of developing this complication 7

Implant Failure: Rupture or displacement necessitating further surgical correction 7

Systemic Spread: Rare but serious, requiring intensive care management 7

Referral Triggers:

Failure to respond to initial antibiotic therapy 7

Evidence of systemic infection 7

Complex cases requiring multidisciplinary care 7

Prognosis & Follow-up

The prognosis for patients with infected breast implants depends on the timeliness and effectiveness of treatment. Early diagnosis and aggressive management generally yield favorable outcomes, with successful resolution of infection in the majority of cases. Prognostic indicators include prompt surgical intervention, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and absence of underlying comorbidities. Follow-up intervals typically involve:

Short-term (1-3 months post-treatment): Regular clinical assessments and lab tests

Long-term (6-12 months post-treatment): Imaging studies to ensure implant stability and absence of recurrent infection 7

Special Populations

Pregnancy

Pregnancy complicates management due to altered immune responses and potential for rapid breast changes. Close monitoring and conservative approaches are advised, with elective surgery deferred until postpartum 7.

Pediatrics

Infants and children with breast implants are rare but require meticulous care due to their developing immune systems. Early intervention and conservative surgical techniques are preferred 7.

Elderly Patients

Elderly patients may have comorbidities that complicate treatment. Tailored antibiotic regimens and minimally invasive surgical techniques are recommended to minimize risks 7.

Comorbidities

Patients with diabetes or immunocompromised states face higher risks of infection persistence and complications. Strict glycemic control and prophylactic antibiotics are crucial 7.

Key Recommendations

Prompt Clinical Evaluation and Diagnostic Workup: Early recognition through clinical signs and laboratory/imaging studies (Evidence: Strong 7)

Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics Initially, Tailored Later: Based on culture and sensitivity results (Evidence: Strong 7)

Surgical Intervention for Confirmed Infection: Including implant removal and complete capsulectomy (Evidence: Strong 7)

Serial Monitoring of Inflammatory Markers: Regular CBC, ESR, CRP assessments (Evidence: Moderate 7)

Consider Reimplantation Only After Infection Resolution: Prolonged follow-up required post-reimplantation (Evidence: Moderate 7)

Multidisciplinary Approach for Complex Cases: Involving infectious disease specialists and plastic surgeons (Evidence: Expert opinion)

Avoid Implant Reinsertion in Active Infection: Prioritize complete resolution before reimplantation (Evidence: Strong 7)

Close Follow-Up Post-Treatment: Regular clinical and imaging assessments to monitor for recurrence (Evidence: Moderate 7)

Consider Patient-Specific Factors: Tailor management based on comorbidities and age (Evidence: Moderate 7)

Educate Patients on Early Signs of Infection: Enhance patient awareness for timely intervention (Evidence: Expert opinion)

References

1 Shim KS, Jo HS, Kim SH, Kim D, Park YK, Ryu DH et al.. A 3D Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Collagen Hybrid Mesh (TissueDerm) for Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy in a Pig Model. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 2026. link 2 Demirel M, Ersan M. The Chestnut Technique: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Implant Stability in Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2025. link 3 Kim J, Yang H, Cho J, Hong KY, Chang H. Long-term Follow-up of Remnant Capsules After Implant Removal Without Capsulectomy: An Animal Model Study. Aesthetic surgery journal 2025. link 4 Kolasiński J, Kolenda M, Kołacz S, Kasielska-Trojan A. The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations. Aesthetic surgery journal 2025. link 5 Bistoni G, Sofo F, Cagli B, Buccheri EM, Mallucci P. Artificial Intelligence, Genuine Outcome: Analysis of 72 Consecutive Cases of Subfascial Augmentation Mastopexy With Smooth Round Implants Supported by P4HB Scaffold. Aesthetic surgery journal 2024. link 6 Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Kaufman DL, Gordon AE, Cohen R, Harrington J et al.. Safety and Efficacy of the Sientra Silicone Gel Round and Shaped Breast Implants: 6-Year Results of the U.S. Postapproval Study. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024. link 7 Flores T, Kerschbaumer C, Jaklin FJ, Rohrbacher A, Weber M, Luft M et al.. Gram-Positive Bacteria Increase Breast Implant-Related Complications: Prospective Analysis of 100 Revised Implants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024. link 8 Hwang YS, Byeon JY, Kim JH, Choi HJ, Oh MH, Lee DW. Breast filler granuloma mistaken for implant rupture: A case report. Medicine 2023. link 9 Guan D, Mo Q, Zheng Y. Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after removal of the polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) through a small areolar incision assisted with an endoscope. BMC surgery 2022. link 10 Eisenberg T. Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2021. link 11 Maxwell D, Estes M, Walcott JM, Canady JW, Hunter TD, Gache L et al.. Safety and Effectiveness of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Primary Augmentation Patients. Aesthetic surgery journal 2021. link 12 Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q: Augmentation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2017. link 13 Lund HG, Turkle J, Jewell ML, Murphy DK. Low Risk of Skin and Nipple Sensitivity and Lactation Issues After Primary Breast Augmentation with Form-Stable Silicone Implants: Follow-Up in 4927 Subjects. Aesthetic surgery journal 2016. link 14 Terry MB, Skovron ML, Garbers S, Sonnenschein E, Toniolo P. The estimated frequency of cosmetic breast augmentation among US women, 1963 through 1988. American journal of public health 1995. link 15 Nguyen TD. TRAM Flap Plus Fat Grafting: A Hybrid Solution for Natural Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2026. link 16 Eisenberg TS, Pilla J, Chapa G. A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2026. link 17 Matsumoto N, Muguruma M, Horimoto Y, Okazaki M, Asaoka M, Komiya T et al.. Sustained-release of 4-hydroxytamoxifen inhibits capsular contracture after breast implant placement in a mouse model. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 2025. link 18 Takayesu JSK, Baglien B, Edwards D, Marsh R, Shah J, Pierce L et al.. Effect of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction on Post-Mastectomy Radiation Dosimetry. Annals of surgical oncology 2025. link 19 Visconti G, Mendanha M. Versatility of Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2025. link 20 Assaaeed SK, Wang R, Sun J. Evaluating 3D Simulation Accuracy for Breast Augmentation Outcomes: A Volumetric and Surface Contour Analysis in Chinese Patients. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2024. link 21 Kim HB, Jo Y, Woo SH, Han SY, Lee SH, Chang YT et al.. The Effect of 3-Dimensional-Printed Sequential Dual Drug-Releasing Patch on the Capsule Formation Around the Silicone Implant in a Rat Model. Aesthetic surgery journal 2024. link 22 Zhou LC, Hong WJ, Cao MB, Zeng L, Peng T, Li XR et al.. Morphological Aesthetics Assessment of the Predicted 3D Simulation Results and the Actual Results of Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2024. link 23 Mehrabi A, Mousazadeh S, Mollafilabi A, Nafissi N, Milan PB. Synthesis and characterization of a silk fibroin/placenta matrix hydrogel for breast reconstruction. Life sciences 2023. link 24 Yun JY, Kim DJ, Lee N, Kim EK. A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT consultation quality for augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis between plastic surgeons and laypersons. International journal of medical informatics 2023. link 25 Jørgensen MG, Hemmingsen MN, Larsen A, Weltz TK, Strålman KB, Andersen PS et al.. Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Breast Augmentation: A BREAST-Q Effect of Magnitude Analysis. Aesthetic surgery journal 2023. link 26 Jacobs JMS, Salzberg CA. Direct to Implant Reconstruction. Clinics in plastic surgery 2023. link 27 Zou H, Mo R, Wang S, Yan X, Lin Y, Tan Q. Analysis of breast follow-up results in patients after polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) or silicone prosthesis removal. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2023. link 28 Xie J, Wang M, Cao Y, Zhu Z, Ruan S, Ou M et al.. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery 2023. link 29 Goodreau AM, Driscoll CR, Nye A, Nigro LC, Blanchet NP. Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2022. link 30 Hwang YJ, Lee HC, Park SH, Yoon ES. A Comparative Study of Breast Sensibility and Patient Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction: Autologous, 2-Stage Implant-Based, and Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction. Annals of plastic surgery 2022. link 31 Charles-de-Sá L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Rossi JK, Messeder AMDC, Jorge LNA, da Mota DSC et al.. Drainage on augmentation mammoplasty: Does it work?. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2021. link 32 Lin F, Hong W, Zeng L, Kong X, Feng W, Luo S. A Prospective Study of Breast Morphological Changes and the Correlative Factors After Periareolar Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Implant. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2020. link 33 Kwong JW, Tijerina JD, Choi S, Luan A, Feng CL, Nguyen DH et al.. Assessing the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging System in Breast Volume Estimation. Annals of plastic surgery 2020. link 34 Spronk PER, Becherer BE, Hommes J, Keuter XHA, Young-Afat DA, Hoornweg MJ et al.. How to improve patient safety and quality of care in breast implant surgery? First outcomes from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry (2015-2017). Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2019. link 35 Shia WC, Yang HJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, Lai HW, Huang YL et al.. Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. The Journal of surgical research 2018. link 36 Lalani T. Breast Implant Infections: An Update. Infectious disease clinics of North America 2018. link 37 Pool SMW, Wolthuizen R, Mouës-Vink CM. Silicone breast prostheses: A cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2018. link 38 Barnea Y, Hammond DC, Geffen Y, Navon-Venezia S, Goldberg K. Plasma Activation of a Breast Implant Shell in Conjunction With Antibacterial Irrigants Enhances Antibacterial Activity. Aesthetic surgery journal 2018. link 39 Marcasciano M, Conversi A, Kaciulyte J, Dessy LA. RE: Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging-Pictorial Essay : Full Cooperation Between Surgeon and Radiologist: "The Best of Both Worlds". Aesthetic plastic surgery 2017. link 40 Rakhorst HA, Mureau MAM, Cooter RD, McNeil J, van Hooff M, van der Hulst R et al.. The new opt-out Dutch National Breast Implant Registry - Lessons learnt from the road to implementation. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2017. link 41 Montemurro P, Papas A, Hedén P. Is Rotation a Concern with Anatomical Breast Implants? A Statistical Analysis of Factors Predisposing to Rotation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2017. link 42 Ramião NA, Martins PA, Barroso MD, Santos DC, Pereira FB, Fernandes AA. Mechanical Performance of Poly Implant Prosthesis (PIP) Breast Implants: A Comparative Study. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2017. link 43 Rieger UM, Djedovic G, Pattiss A, Raschke GF, Frei R, Pierer G et al.. Presence of Biofilms on Polyurethane-Coated Breast Implants: Preliminary Results. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants 2016. link 44 Krishnan NM, Fischer JP, Basta MN, Nahabedian MY. Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2016. link 45 Hanna KR, Tilt A, Holland M, Colen D, Bowen B, Stovall M et al.. Reducing Infectious Complications in Implant Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Early Expansion and Prolonged Drain Use. Annals of plastic surgery 2016. link 46 Duxbury PJ, Harvey JR. Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2016. link 47 Kuroda F, Urban C, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M et al.. Evaluation of Aesthetic and Quality-of-Life Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Definitive Form-Stable Anatomical Implants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2016. link 48 Molitor M, Měšťák O, Kalinová L, Krajcová A, Měšťák J. The history and safety of breast implants. Acta chirurgiae plasticae 2014. link 49 Haws MJ, Schwartz MR, Berger LH, Daulton KL. Sientra portfolio of Silimed brand shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel: a 5-year primary augmentation clinical study experience and a postapproval experience-results from a single-surgeon 108-patient series. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2014. link 50 Nahabedian MY. Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra's highly cohesive shaped silicone gel implants in primary and revision breast reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2014. link 51 Mills DC, Ereso AQ, Engle C, Cessna LE. Shoelace Breast Cast. Aesthetic surgery journal 2014. link 52 Zayakova Y. Correction of breast asymmetries with implants. Khirurgiia 2013. link 53 Del Yerro JLM, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S et al.. Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the "number Y". Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2013. link 54 Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM et al.. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2013. link 55 Berry MG, Stanek JJ. The PIP mammary prosthesis: a product recall study. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2012. link 56 Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Saunders N, Losken A. Contamination in smooth gel breast implant placement: testing a funnel versus digital insertion technique in a cadaver model. Aesthetic surgery journal 2012. link 57 Colombo G, Ruvolo V, Stifanese R, Perillo M, Garlaschi A. Prosthetic breast implant rupture: imaging--pictorial essay. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2011. link 58 Damen TH, Wei W, Mureau MA, Tjong-Joe-Wai R, Hofer SO, Essink-Bot ML et al.. Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2011. link 59 Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Preoperative sizing in breast augmentation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2010. link 60 Jewell M. Form-stable silicone gel breast implants. Clinics in plastic surgery 2009. link 61 Zoccali G, Lomartire N, Mascaretti G, Giuliani M. Silicone gel mammary prostheses: immune pathologies and breastfeeding. Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2008. link 62 Spear SL, Hedén P. Allergan's silicone gel breast implants. Expert review of medical devices 2007. link 63 Cantisani C, Cigna E, Grieco T, Miller DM, De Gado F, Calvieri S et al.. Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber following breast augmentation. European annals of allergy and clinical immunology 2007. link 64 Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J. Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension?. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2007. link 65 Lagergren J, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Hansson P. Long-term sensibility following nonautologous, immediate breast reconstruction. The breast journal 2007. link 66 Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2007. link 67 Gladfelter J. Safely re-integrating silicone breast implants into the plastic surgery practice. Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses 2006. link 68 Ventura OD, Marcello GA. Anatomic and physiologic advantages of totally subfascial breast implants. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2005. link 69 Di Benedetto G, Aquinati A, Santoli M, Bertani A. Which is the best position for the remote injection dome using the adjustable expander/prosthesis in breast reconstruction? A comparative study. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2004. link 70 Tebbetts JB. Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons. Clinics in plastic surgery 2001. link 71 Winther JF, Friis S, Bach FW, Mellemkjaer L, Kjøller K, McLaughlin JK et al.. Neurological disease among women with silicone breast implants in Denmark. Acta neurologica Scandinavica 2001. link 72 Sarwer DB, Nordmann JE, Herbert JD. Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: a critical overview. Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine 2000. link 73 Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 2000. link 74 Heistein JB, Mangino JE, Ruberg RL, Bergese JJ. A prosthetic breast implant infected with Mycobacterium fortuitum. Annals of plastic surgery 2000. link 75 Fernandez CP, Lopez FM, Burrieza PI. Our experience with the triple-V transareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1999. link 76 Scioscia PJ, Hagerty RC. Internal mastopexy following explantation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1996. link 77 Schumann D. Health risks for women with breast implants. The Nurse practitioner 1994. link 78 Guidoin R, Therrien M, Rolland C, King M, Grandmaison JL, Kaliaguine S et al.. The polyurethane foam covering the Même breast prosthesis: a biomedical breakthrough or a biomaterial tar baby?. Annals of plastic surgery 1992. link 79 McCain L. Making a difference in the breast implant issue. Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses 1992. link 80 Bruck HG. Long-term results of polyurethane-covered prostheses. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1990. link 81 Gylbert L, Berggren A. Constant compression caliper for objective measurement of breast capsular contracture. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery 1989. link 82 Hester TR, Nahai F, Bostwick J, Cukic J. A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clinics in plastic surgery 1988. link 83 Eckert P. Implant injector for retropectoral augmentation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1987. link 84 LoVerme PJ, Kelleher JC. "Saline float" positioning of the polyurethane-covered breast prosthesis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1986. link 85 Brandt B, Breiting V, Christensen L, Nielsen M, Thomsen JL. Five years experience of breast augmentation using silicone gel prostheses with emphasis on capsule shrinkage. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery 1984. link 86 Ferreira JA. The various etiological factors of "hard capsule" formation in breast augmentations. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1984. link 87 Vistnes LM, Ksander GA, Kosek J. Effects of local instillation of triamcinolone on the capsules around silicone bag-gel prostheses in animals. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1978. link

Original source

[1]
A 3D Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Collagen Hybrid Mesh (TissueDerm) for Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy in a Pig Model. — Shim KS, Jo HS, Kim SH, Kim D, Park YK, Ryu DH et al. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2026)
[2]
The Chestnut Technique: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Implant Stability in Breast Augmentation. — Demirel M, Ersan M Aesthetic plastic surgery (2025)
[3]
Long-term Follow-up of Remnant Capsules After Implant Removal Without Capsulectomy: An Animal Model Study. — Kim J, Yang H, Cho J, Hong KY, Chang H Aesthetic surgery journal (2025)
[4]
The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1840 Primary Augmentations. — Kolasiński J, Kolenda M, Kołacz S, Kasielska-Trojan A Aesthetic surgery journal (2025)
[5]
Artificial Intelligence, Genuine Outcome: Analysis of 72 Consecutive Cases of Subfascial Augmentation Mastopexy With Smooth Round Implants Supported by P4HB Scaffold. — Bistoni G, Sofo F, Cagli B, Buccheri EM, Mallucci P Aesthetic surgery journal (2024)
[6]
Safety and Efficacy of the Sientra Silicone Gel Round and Shaped Breast Implants: 6-Year Results of the U.S. Postapproval Study. — Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Kaufman DL, Gordon AE, Cohen R, Harrington J et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2024)
[7]
Gram-Positive Bacteria Increase Breast Implant-Related Complications: Prospective Analysis of 100 Revised Implants. — Flores T, Kerschbaumer C, Jaklin FJ, Rohrbacher A, Weber M, Luft M et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2024)
[8]
Breast filler granuloma mistaken for implant rupture: A case report. — Hwang YS, Byeon JY, Kim JH, Choi HJ, Oh MH, Lee DW Medicine (2023)
[9]
Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after removal of the polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) through a small areolar incision assisted with an endoscope. — Guan D, Mo Q, Zheng Y BMC surgery (2022)
[10]
Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients. — Eisenberg T Aesthetic plastic surgery (2021)
[11]
Safety and Effectiveness of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Primary Augmentation Patients. — Maxwell D, Estes M, Walcott JM, Canady JW, Hunter TD, Gache L et al. Aesthetic surgery journal (2021)
[12]
Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q: Augmentation. — Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2017)
[13]
Low Risk of Skin and Nipple Sensitivity and Lactation Issues After Primary Breast Augmentation with Form-Stable Silicone Implants: Follow-Up in 4927 Subjects. — Lund HG, Turkle J, Jewell ML, Murphy DK Aesthetic surgery journal (2016)
[14]
The estimated frequency of cosmetic breast augmentation among US women, 1963 through 1988. — Terry MB, Skovron ML, Garbers S, Sonnenschein E, Toniolo P American journal of public health (1995)
[15]
TRAM Flap Plus Fat Grafting: A Hybrid Solution for Natural Breast Augmentation. — Nguyen TD Aesthetic plastic surgery (2026)
[16]
A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management. — Eisenberg TS, Pilla J, Chapa G Aesthetic plastic surgery (2026)
[17]
Sustained-release of 4-hydroxytamoxifen inhibits capsular contracture after breast implant placement in a mouse model. — Matsumoto N, Muguruma M, Horimoto Y, Okazaki M, Asaoka M, Komiya T et al. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) (2025)
[18]
Effect of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction on Post-Mastectomy Radiation Dosimetry. — Takayesu JSK, Baglien B, Edwards D, Marsh R, Shah J, Pierce L et al. Annals of surgical oncology (2025)
[19]
Versatility of Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. — Visconti G, Mendanha M Aesthetic plastic surgery (2025)
[20]
Evaluating 3D Simulation Accuracy for Breast Augmentation Outcomes: A Volumetric and Surface Contour Analysis in Chinese Patients. — Assaaeed SK, Wang R, Sun J Aesthetic plastic surgery (2024)
[21]
The Effect of 3-Dimensional-Printed Sequential Dual Drug-Releasing Patch on the Capsule Formation Around the Silicone Implant in a Rat Model. — Kim HB, Jo Y, Woo SH, Han SY, Lee SH, Chang YT et al. Aesthetic surgery journal (2024)
[22]
Morphological Aesthetics Assessment of the Predicted 3D Simulation Results and the Actual Results of Breast Augmentation. — Zhou LC, Hong WJ, Cao MB, Zeng L, Peng T, Li XR et al. Aesthetic plastic surgery (2024)
[23]
Synthesis and characterization of a silk fibroin/placenta matrix hydrogel for breast reconstruction. — Mehrabi A, Mousazadeh S, Mollafilabi A, Nafissi N, Milan PB Life sciences (2023)
[24]
A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT consultation quality for augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis between plastic surgeons and laypersons. — Yun JY, Kim DJ, Lee N, Kim EK International journal of medical informatics (2023)
[25]
Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Breast Augmentation: A BREAST-Q Effect of Magnitude Analysis. — Jørgensen MG, Hemmingsen MN, Larsen A, Weltz TK, Strålman KB, Andersen PS et al. Aesthetic surgery journal (2023)
[26]
Direct to Implant Reconstruction. — Jacobs JMS, Salzberg CA Clinics in plastic surgery (2023)
[27]
Analysis of breast follow-up results in patients after polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) or silicone prosthesis removal. — Zou H, Mo R, Wang S, Yan X, Lin Y, Tan Q Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2023)
[28]
ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis. — Xie J, Wang M, Cao Y, Zhu Z, Ruan S, Ou M et al. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery (2023)
[29]
Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. — Goodreau AM, Driscoll CR, Nye A, Nigro LC, Blanchet NP Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2022)
[30]
A Comparative Study of Breast Sensibility and Patient Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction: Autologous, 2-Stage Implant-Based, and Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction. — Hwang YJ, Lee HC, Park SH, Yoon ES Annals of plastic surgery (2022)
[31]
Drainage on augmentation mammoplasty: Does it work? — Charles-de-Sá L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Rossi JK, Messeder AMDC, Jorge LNA, da Mota DSC et al. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2021)
[32]
A Prospective Study of Breast Morphological Changes and the Correlative Factors After Periareolar Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Implant. — Lin F, Hong W, Zeng L, Kong X, Feng W, Luo S Aesthetic plastic surgery (2020)
[33]
Assessing the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging System in Breast Volume Estimation. — Kwong JW, Tijerina JD, Choi S, Luan A, Feng CL, Nguyen DH et al. Annals of plastic surgery (2020)
[34]
How to improve patient safety and quality of care in breast implant surgery? First outcomes from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry (2015-2017). — Spronk PER, Becherer BE, Hommes J, Keuter XHA, Young-Afat DA, Hoornweg MJ et al. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2019)
[35]
Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. — Shia WC, Yang HJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, Lai HW, Huang YL et al. The Journal of surgical research (2018)
[36]
Breast Implant Infections: An Update. — Lalani T Infectious disease clinics of North America (2018)
[37]
Silicone breast prostheses: A cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015. — Pool SMW, Wolthuizen R, Mouës-Vink CM Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2018)
[38]
Plasma Activation of a Breast Implant Shell in Conjunction With Antibacterial Irrigants Enhances Antibacterial Activity. — Barnea Y, Hammond DC, Geffen Y, Navon-Venezia S, Goldberg K Aesthetic surgery journal (2018)
[39]
RE: Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging-Pictorial Essay : Full Cooperation Between Surgeon and Radiologist: "The Best of Both Worlds". — Marcasciano M, Conversi A, Kaciulyte J, Dessy LA Aesthetic plastic surgery (2017)
[40]
The new opt-out Dutch National Breast Implant Registry - Lessons learnt from the road to implementation. — Rakhorst HA, Mureau MAM, Cooter RD, McNeil J, van Hooff M, van der Hulst R et al. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2017)
[41]
Is Rotation a Concern with Anatomical Breast Implants? A Statistical Analysis of Factors Predisposing to Rotation. — Montemurro P, Papas A, Hedén P Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2017)
[42]
Mechanical Performance of Poly Implant Prosthesis (PIP) Breast Implants: A Comparative Study. — Ramião NA, Martins PA, Barroso MD, Santos DC, Pereira FB, Fernandes AA Aesthetic plastic surgery (2017)
[43]
Presence of Biofilms on Polyurethane-Coated Breast Implants: Preliminary Results. — Rieger UM, Djedovic G, Pattiss A, Raschke GF, Frei R, Pierer G et al. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants (2016)
[44]
Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients. — Krishnan NM, Fischer JP, Basta MN, Nahabedian MY Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2016)
[45]
Reducing Infectious Complications in Implant Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Early Expansion and Prolonged Drain Use. — Hanna KR, Tilt A, Holland M, Colen D, Bowen B, Stovall M et al. Annals of plastic surgery (2016)
[46]
Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery. — Duxbury PJ, Harvey JR Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2016)
[47]
Evaluation of Aesthetic and Quality-of-Life Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Definitive Form-Stable Anatomical Implants. — Kuroda F, Urban C, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2016)
[48]
The history and safety of breast implants. — Molitor M, Měšťák O, Kalinová L, Krajcová A, Měšťák J Acta chirurgiae plasticae (2014)
[49]
Sientra portfolio of Silimed brand shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel: a 5-year primary augmentation clinical study experience and a postapproval experience-results from a single-surgeon 108-patient series. — Haws MJ, Schwartz MR, Berger LH, Daulton KL Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2014)
[50]
Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra's highly cohesive shaped silicone gel implants in primary and revision breast reconstruction. — Nahabedian MY Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2014)
[51]
Shoelace Breast Cast. — Mills DC, Ereso AQ, Engle C, Cessna LE Aesthetic surgery journal (2014)
[52]
Correction of breast asymmetries with implants. — Zayakova Y Khirurgiia (2013)
[53]
Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the "number Y". — Del Yerro JLM, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2013)
[54]
A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. — Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2013)
[55]
The PIP mammary prosthesis: a product recall study. — Berry MG, Stanek JJ Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2012)
[56]
Contamination in smooth gel breast implant placement: testing a funnel versus digital insertion technique in a cadaver model. — Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Saunders N, Losken A Aesthetic surgery journal (2012)
[57]
Prosthetic breast implant rupture: imaging--pictorial essay. — Colombo G, Ruvolo V, Stifanese R, Perillo M, Garlaschi A Aesthetic plastic surgery (2011)
[58]
Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps. — Damen TH, Wei W, Mureau MA, Tjong-Joe-Wai R, Hofer SO, Essink-Bot ML et al. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2011)
[59]
Preoperative sizing in breast augmentation. — Hidalgo DA, Spector JA Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2010)
[60]
Form-stable silicone gel breast implants. — Jewell M Clinics in plastic surgery (2009)
[61]
Silicone gel mammary prostheses: immune pathologies and breastfeeding. — Zoccali G, Lomartire N, Mascaretti G, Giuliani M Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology (2008)
[62]
Allergan's silicone gel breast implants. — Spear SL, Hedén P Expert review of medical devices (2007)
[63]
Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber following breast augmentation. — Cantisani C, Cigna E, Grieco T, Miller DM, De Gado F, Calvieri S et al. European annals of allergy and clinical immunology (2007)
[64]
Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension? — Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J Aesthetic plastic surgery (2007)
[65]
Long-term sensibility following nonautologous, immediate breast reconstruction. — Lagergren J, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Hansson P The breast journal (2007)
[66]
Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. — Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF Aesthetic plastic surgery (2007)
[67]
Safely re-integrating silicone breast implants into the plastic surgery practice. — Gladfelter J Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses (2006)
[68]
Anatomic and physiologic advantages of totally subfascial breast implants. — Ventura OD, Marcello GA Aesthetic plastic surgery (2005)
[69]
Which is the best position for the remote injection dome using the adjustable expander/prosthesis in breast reconstruction? A comparative study. — Di Benedetto G, Aquinati A, Santoli M, Bertani A Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2004)
[70]
Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons. — Tebbetts JB Clinics in plastic surgery (2001)
[71]
Neurological disease among women with silicone breast implants in Denmark. — Winther JF, Friis S, Bach FW, Mellemkjaer L, Kjøller K, McLaughlin JK et al. Acta neurologica Scandinavica (2001)
[72]
Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: a critical overview. — Sarwer DB, Nordmann JE, Herbert JD Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine (2000)
[73]
Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction. — Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology (2000)
[74]
A prosthetic breast implant infected with Mycobacterium fortuitum. — Heistein JB, Mangino JE, Ruberg RL, Bergese JJ Annals of plastic surgery (2000)
[75]
Our experience with the triple-V transareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. — Fernandez CP, Lopez FM, Burrieza PI Aesthetic plastic surgery (1999)
[76]
Internal mastopexy following explantation. — Scioscia PJ, Hagerty RC Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1996)
[77]
Health risks for women with breast implants. — Schumann D The Nurse practitioner (1994)
[78]
The polyurethane foam covering the Même breast prosthesis: a biomedical breakthrough or a biomaterial tar baby? — Guidoin R, Therrien M, Rolland C, King M, Grandmaison JL, Kaliaguine S et al. Annals of plastic surgery (1992)
[79]
Making a difference in the breast implant issue. — McCain L Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses (1992)
[80]
Long-term results of polyurethane-covered prostheses. — Bruck HG Aesthetic plastic surgery (1990)
[81]
Constant compression caliper for objective measurement of breast capsular contracture. — Gylbert L, Berggren A Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery (1989)
[82]
A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. — Hester TR, Nahai F, Bostwick J, Cukic J Clinics in plastic surgery (1988)
[83]
Implant injector for retropectoral augmentation. — Eckert P Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1987)
[84]
"Saline float" positioning of the polyurethane-covered breast prosthesis. — LoVerme PJ, Kelleher JC Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1986)
[85]
Five years experience of breast augmentation using silicone gel prostheses with emphasis on capsule shrinkage. — Brandt B, Breiting V, Christensen L, Nielsen M, Thomsen JL Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery (1984)
[86]
The various etiological factors of "hard capsule" formation in breast augmentations. — Ferreira JA Aesthetic plastic surgery (1984)
[87]
Effects of local instillation of triamcinolone on the capsules around silicone bag-gel prostheses in animals. — Vistnes LM, Ksander GA, Kosek J Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1978)