← Back to guidelines
Obstetrics7 papers

Neoplasm of border of tongue

Last edited: 1 h ago

Overview

Border disease virus (BDV), now taxonomically classified as Pestivirus ovis, is a significant viral pathogen affecting primarily sheep but occasionally other small ruminants, pigs, and cattle. The virus predominantly causes reproductive losses through transplacental infection during critical stages of gestation, leading to embryonic loss, abortion, stillbirths, and the birth of persistently infected (PI) lambs with characteristic clinical signs such as a hairy fleece, neurological abnormalities, and poor body conformation. These PI lambs serve as continual sources of viral transmission within flocks. Understanding and managing BDV infection is crucial in veterinary practice to mitigate substantial economic losses due to reproductive failure and to control viral spread within livestock populations 1234.

Pathophysiology

BDV infection initiates its pathophysiological cascade primarily through vertical transmission during pregnancy. When ewes are infected before the establishment of fetal immunocompetence (typically between 60 and 85 days of gestation), the virus can cross the placenta and infect the developing fetus. In immunocompetent fetuses, this infection often results in fetal death, manifesting as abortion, resorption, or stillbirth. In contrast, infection before immunocompetence leads to widespread viral dissemination in multiple fetal organs, producing PI lambs. These lambs exhibit a range of clinical manifestations due to the virus's impact on multiple organ systems, particularly the central nervous system and integumentary system, leading to neurological deficits and characteristic physical traits like a hairy coat and abnormal body conformation 36. The virus's ability to cause placentitis further complicates fetal development, contributing to placental pathology and fetal demise 37.

Epidemiology

The incidence and prevalence of BDV vary significantly by region and management practices. In extensive pasture-based systems, particularly during periods of drought necessitating intensive feeding conditions, the risk of BDV transmission increases due to close animal contact. Studies indicate that endemic areas with poor biosecurity measures and frequent introductions of potentially infected animals see higher seroprevalence rates. For instance, in dairy sheep flocks, higher BDV seroprevalence correlates with lower within-flock seroprevalence, suggesting that bulk-tank milk analysis can be a useful tool for monitoring flock health 4. Geographic trends show higher incidences in regions with extensive sheep farming and less stringent control measures, although specific incidence figures are not consistently reported across global studies 124.

Clinical Presentation

Clinical signs of BDV infection in sheep are predominantly observed in reproductive outcomes and newborn lambs. Reproductive losses include increased rates of abortion, stillbirths, and weak or dead neonates. PI lambs typically present with a distinctive hairy coat, neurological abnormalities such as tremors and ataxia, and poor body condition. These lambs often exhibit delayed growth and survival rates, with many succumbing shortly after birth or during early life stages. Less commonly, non-PI lambs born to infected ewes may show transient signs of illness or weakness post-birth. Early embryonic losses might go unnoticed without thorough diagnostic testing 135.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of BDV infection involves a combination of clinical suspicion, serological testing, and molecular methods. Initial suspicion arises from a history of reproductive losses and the presence of characteristic PI lambs. Specific diagnostic criteria include:

  • Serological Testing: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and agar gel immunodiffusion tests for detecting antibodies in serum or bulk-tank milk 45.
  • Molecular Detection: Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for viral RNA in fetal fluids, tissues, or blood samples 56.
  • Antigen Detection: Antigen ELISA in blood or fetal fluids to identify viral antigens directly 5.
  • Histopathology: Examination of fetal tissues for characteristic lesions and viral antigen presence via immunohistochemistry 36.
  • Differential Diagnosis:

  • Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV): Distinguished by specific serological tests targeting BVDV antigens and genetic sequencing 27.
  • Mucosal Disease: Identified through viral isolation and specific serological testing for MDV 7.
  • Management

    First-Line Management

  • Quarantine and Isolation: Separate PI lambs and infected ewes to prevent further spread.
  • Enhanced Biosecurity: Implement strict hygiene protocols, including disinfection of facilities and equipment, and limit animal movement between flocks 13.
  • Second-Line Management

  • Vaccination: Use of available vaccines to boost herd immunity, particularly in maiden ewes before joining 1.
  • Supportive Care: Provide nutritional support and monitoring for non-PI lambs born to infected ewes to improve survival rates.
  • Specialist Escalation

  • Consultation with a Specialist: For persistent outbreaks or refractory cases, consult a veterinary specialist in infectious diseases for tailored control strategies.
  • Advanced Diagnostic Testing: Employ more sophisticated molecular diagnostics and histopathology for definitive diagnosis and monitoring 6.
  • Contraindications:

  • Vaccination should be avoided in actively infected animals due to potential exacerbation of clinical signs 1.
  • Complications

  • Persistent Infection: PI lambs continue to shed virus, perpetuating the infection within the flock.
  • Reproductive Failure: Chronic reproductive losses can lead to significant economic impacts and flock sustainability issues.
  • Neurological Sequelae: Long-term neurological deficits in surviving PI lambs may affect their productivity and welfare 36.
  • Prognosis & Follow-up

    The prognosis for PI lambs is generally poor, with high mortality rates observed, especially in the early stages of life. For non-PI lambs, prognosis improves with supportive care but may still include developmental delays. Regular monitoring of seroprevalence through bulk-tank milk analysis and periodic RT-PCR testing of high-risk cohorts (e.g., maiden ewes) is recommended to manage and control outbreaks effectively 4.

    Special Populations

  • Maiden Ewes: These ewes, especially when joined at younger ages, are at higher risk due to limited acquired immunity, necessitating stringent biosecurity and vaccination strategies 224.
  • Pregnant Ewes: Close monitoring and proactive management are essential to mitigate reproductive losses during critical gestation periods 3.
  • Key Recommendations

  • Implement strict biosecurity measures, including quarantine of new animals and isolation of PI lambs to prevent viral spread (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • Conduct regular serological testing (ELISA) and molecular screening (RT-PCR) in high-risk populations, such as maiden ewes and pregnant ewes (Evidence: Moderate).
  • Use bulk-tank milk analysis to monitor flock-level BDV seroprevalence and adjust management practices accordingly (Evidence: Moderate).
  • Vaccinate maiden ewes before joining to enhance herd immunity, provided the flock is not actively infected (Evidence: Moderate).
  • Employ enhanced hygiene protocols in confined feeding areas to reduce transmission during periods of intensive management (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • Monitor and manage reproductive outcomes closely, focusing on early detection and intervention for affected ewes and neonates (Evidence: Moderate).
  • Consider specialist consultation for persistent or severe outbreaks to tailor control strategies effectively (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • Implement regular follow-up testing to assess the effectiveness of control measures and adjust as necessary (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • Educate farm managers on the clinical signs and importance of early intervention in managing BDV outbreaks (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • Promote cross-flock communication and collaboration to share best practices and control strategies (Evidence: Expert opinion).
  • References

    1 Parrish K, Spiers ZB, Hazelton MS, Walker KH, Duggan E, Graham W et al.. Large-scale reproductive loss in sheep due to Border disease virus infection, New South Wales, Australia. Australian veterinary journal 2026. link 2 Braun U, Janett F, Züblin S, von Büren M, Hilbe M, Zanoni R et al.. Insemination with border disease virus-infected semen results in seroconversion in cows but not persistent infection in fetuses. BMC veterinary research 2018. link 3 Fernández M, Braun U, Frei S, Schweizer M, Hilbe M. Border Disease Virus Infection of Bovine Placentas. Veterinary pathology 2018. link 4 García-Pérez AL, Ruiz-Fons F, Barandika JF, Aduriz G, Juste RA, Hurtado A. Border disease virus seroprevalence correlates to antibodies in bulk-tank milk and reproductive performance of dairy sheep flocks. Journal of dairy science 2010. link 5 García-Pérez AL, Minguijón E, Barandika JF, Aduriz G, Povedano I, Juste RA et al.. Detection of Border disease virus in fetuses, stillbirths, and newborn lambs from natural and experimental infections. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc 2009. link 6 Plant JW, Walker KH, Acland HM, Gard GP. Pathology in the ovine foetus caused by an ovine pestivirus. Australian veterinary journal 1983. link 7 Plant JW, Acland HM, Gard GP. A mucosal disease virus as a cause of abortion hairy birth coat and unthriftiness in sheep. 1. Infiction of pregnant ewes and observations on aborted foetuses and lambs dying before one week of age. Australian veterinary journal 1976. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
      Large-scale reproductive loss in sheep due to Border disease virus infection, New South Wales, Australia.Parrish K, Spiers ZB, Hazelton MS, Walker KH, Duggan E, Graham W et al. Australian veterinary journal (2026)
    2. [2]
      Insemination with border disease virus-infected semen results in seroconversion in cows but not persistent infection in fetuses.Braun U, Janett F, Züblin S, von Büren M, Hilbe M, Zanoni R et al. BMC veterinary research (2018)
    3. [3]
      Border Disease Virus Infection of Bovine Placentas.Fernández M, Braun U, Frei S, Schweizer M, Hilbe M Veterinary pathology (2018)
    4. [4]
      Border disease virus seroprevalence correlates to antibodies in bulk-tank milk and reproductive performance of dairy sheep flocks.García-Pérez AL, Ruiz-Fons F, Barandika JF, Aduriz G, Juste RA, Hurtado A Journal of dairy science (2010)
    5. [5]
      Detection of Border disease virus in fetuses, stillbirths, and newborn lambs from natural and experimental infections.García-Pérez AL, Minguijón E, Barandika JF, Aduriz G, Povedano I, Juste RA et al. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc (2009)
    6. [6]
      Pathology in the ovine foetus caused by an ovine pestivirus.Plant JW, Walker KH, Acland HM, Gard GP Australian veterinary journal (1983)
    7. [7]

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG