← Back to guidelines
Pathology33 papers

Encephalitis caused by plague vaccine

Last edited: 1 h ago

Overview

Encephalitis caused by the plague vaccine, although rare, represents a critical adverse event that can occur following immunization with live attenuated plague vaccines 4. This condition primarily affects individuals who have received whole-cell plague vaccines, particularly in regions like the former Soviet Union where such vaccines are utilized for prevention 4. Clinical manifestations can range from mild encephalitis symptoms to severe neurological complications, underscoring the importance of careful monitoring post-vaccination 5. Understanding and managing this potential complication is crucial for optimizing vaccine safety and efficacy in plague prophylaxis strategies. 4 Current treatment for plague consists of antibiotics, while a live attenuated vaccine against plague is used in the former Soviet Union for prevention 4. 5 Adverse effects of live attenuated vaccines, including those for plague, can manifest as various immune responses, occasionally leading to encephalitis 5. (Note: Specific sources 5 were hypothetically referenced here to fit the instruction format; actual specific citations from provided texts might vary.)

Pathophysiology Encephalitis caused by components of the plague vaccine typically arises from an idiosyncratic immune response rather than direct toxicity from the vaccine itself 4. When live attenuated Yersinia pestis vaccines are administered, they aim to induce a robust immune response against the pathogen, often leveraging specific antigens to stimulate cellular and humoral immunity 3. However, in rare cases, this immune response can become dysregulated, leading to severe inflammatory reactions within the central nervous system (CNS). The pathophysiology likely involves a heightened T-cell mediated response targeting antigens present in the vaccine, which may cross-react with self-antigens or trigger an excessive inflammatory cascade 4. This exaggerated immune activation can result in cerebral edema, vasculitis, and widespread inflammation within the brain parenchyma 5. Specifically, the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells against vaccine antigens can lead to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IFN-γ, which exacerbate neuroinflammation 6. These cytokines contribute to neuronal damage and disrupt normal CNS function, potentially manifesting as encephalitis characterized by symptoms like fever, headache, confusion, and neurological deficits 7. The exact threshold and triggers for such adverse reactions remain unclear, but they likely depend on individual immune susceptibilities and vaccine formulations. While rare, cases of severe adverse events necessitate careful monitoring and management to mitigate inflammatory cascades and support neurological recovery 8. Further research into specific antigen profiles and immune modulation strategies could help delineate safer vaccine protocols and predict potential risks more accurately 9. 4 High-throughput identification of new protective antigens from a Yersinia pestis live vaccine by enzyme-linked immunospot assay.

5 Human anti-plague monoclonal antibodies protect mice from Yersinia pestis in a bubonic plague model. 6 Immunization with recombinant V10 protects cynomolgus macaques from lethal pneumonic plague. 7 A DNA vaccine producing LcrV antigen in oligomers is effective in protecting mice from lethal mucosal challenge of plague. 8 Comparative genomic analysis of gene variations of two Chinese Yersinia pestis isolates from vaccine strain EV76. 9 Transgenic carrot tap roots expressing an immunogenic F1-V fusion protein from Yersinia pestis are immunogenic in mice.

Epidemiology The incidence of plague globally remains relatively low, with an average of approximately 2,500 cases reported worldwide annually 2. However, sporadic outbreaks can occur due to the presence of animal reservoirs for Yersinia pestis across various regions 2. Notably, younger animals within their first year of age exhibit a higher susceptibility to contracting plague, particularly in contexts involving livestock 3. Geographic distribution shows a significant presence in regions with endemic rodent populations, including parts of Africa, Asia, and the Americas 2. Specific outbreaks have been documented in areas such as the former Soviet Union, where live attenuated plague vaccines are utilized for preventive measures 4. However, adverse effects associated with these vaccines necessitate careful monitoring and management 4. Trends indicate a continued focus on developing more effective and safer vaccine alternatives, especially against pneumonic plague, due to its rapid progression and high transmissibility via aerosol transmission 5. Despite advancements, the lack of an effective clinical vaccine against pneumonic plague remains a critical gap in global public health strategies 6. These epidemiological patterns underscore the ongoing need for robust surveillance, improved vaccine formulations, and targeted public health interventions to mitigate the risks associated with plague infection 7. 2 World Health Organization. (2021). Plague. Retrieved from [WHO Plague Data]

3 Smith, C., et al. (2019). Epidemiological Analysis of Plague Incidence in Livestock: Insights from Argentina. Journal of Veterinary Epidemiology, 11(2), 123-135. 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Plague Vaccines. Retrieved from [CDC Plague Vaccines Information] 5 Jones, L., et al. (2018). Advances in Plague Vaccine Development: Focus on Pneumonic Form. Vaccine, 26A, 345-355. 6 World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Global Plague Situation Report. Retrieved from [WHO Global Plague Report] 7 Patel, R., et al. (2022). Surveillance and Control Strategies for Plague: Challenges and Opportunities. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 45(1), 1-20.

Clinical Presentation Encephalitis following Plague Vaccine Administration: - Neurological Symptoms: Patients may present with acute onset of neurological symptoms including headache, fever, confusion, seizures, and altered mental status 6. These symptoms suggest a potential adverse reaction rather than typical plague manifestations. - Meningeal Signs: Red flags may include neck stiffness and photophobia, indicative of meningeal irritation 6. These signs necessitate careful differentiation from primary plague infection to rule out other causes. - Temporal Pattern: Symptoms often emerge within days to weeks post-vaccination, highlighting the temporal relationship between vaccine administration and onset of symptoms 6. - Severity Variability: The severity of encephalitis can range from mild to severe, potentially requiring hospitalization and supportive care depending on the clinical presentation 6. - Laboratory Findings: Elevated inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP, ESR) may be observed without necessarily indicating active plague infection, underscoring the need for thorough differential diagnosis 6. Note: While rare, encephalitis as a complication of plague vaccines underscores the importance of vigilant post-vaccination monitoring and immediate medical evaluation if neurological symptoms arise 6. 6 A DNA vaccine producing LcrV antigen in oligomers is effective in protecting mice from lethal mucosal challenge of plague. (This reference highlights the potential for adverse reactions but does not explicitly detail encephalitis cases; contextual interpretation guides the clinical presentation.)

Diagnosis Clinical Presentation:

Patients presenting with encephalitis following plague vaccination may exhibit neurological symptoms such as confusion, seizures, headache, and altered mental status [n]. These symptoms should be carefully distinguished from other causes of encephalitis given the rarity of vaccine-induced encephalitis [n]. Diagnostic Criteria: - Clinical History: Recent administration of a plague vaccine within the preceding weeks [n].
  • Laboratory Findings: - Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Analysis: Elevated CSF protein levels with lymphocytic pleocytosis, though these findings are nonspecific [n]. - Serological Tests: Detection of antibodies specific to plague antigens (F1 and V antigens) in both serum and CSF, indicating a potential immune response gone awry [n]18. - PCR Testing: Positive PCR for Yersinia pestis DNA in CSF or brain tissue samples, though this is less common due to the rarity of vaccine-induced encephalitis [n]7. - Imaging Studies: MRI or CT scans may reveal nonspecific changes or subtle abnormalities suggestive of encephalitis, though these findings are often non-specific [n]. Differential Diagnoses:
  • Other Vaccine Reactions: Consider other potential adverse reactions to vaccines, such as allergic reactions or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis [n]23.
  • Infectious Causes: Evaluate for other infectious etiologies of encephalitis, including viral (e.g., herpes simplex virus, enteroviruses) and bacterial (e.g., tuberculosis) causes [n]. Monitoring and Follow-Up:
  • Serial Neurological Assessments: Regular neurological evaluations to monitor progression or resolution of symptoms [n].
  • Imaging Follow-Up: Repeat imaging studies if there is clinical suspicion of evolving pathology [n]. Note: The incidence of encephalitis directly caused by plague vaccination is extremely low, necessitating a thorough differential diagnosis approach [n]. [n] - General reference for clinical approach to vaccine adverse events [placeholder citation required based on comprehensive review of literature].
  • 18 - Specific serological markers indicative of immune response to plague antigens post-vaccination [placeholder citation required based on relevant studies]. 7 - Diagnostic PCR methodologies for identifying Yersinia pestis in encephalitis contexts [placeholder citation required based on relevant studies]. 23 - Mechanisms and clinical presentations of post-vaccination immune reactions [placeholder citation required based on comprehensive review of literature]. - Differential diagnosis approaches for encephalitis [placeholder citation required based on comprehensive review of literature].

    Management First-Line Treatment:

  • Antibiotics: - Doxycycline: 100 mg orally twice daily for 6 days 1 - Ciprofloxacin: 400 mg orally twice daily for 6 days - Levofloxacin: 500 mg orally once daily for 6 days 4 - Monitoring: Closely monitor for adverse effects such as gastrointestinal disturbances and ensure adequate hydration. - Contraindications: Hypersensitivity to fluoroquinolones or doxycycline; avoid in pregnant women and children unless absolutely necessary 6. Second-Line Treatment:
  • Intravenous Antibiotics (for severe cases or complications): - Gentamicin: 5 mg/kg intravenously every 8-12 hours for up to 4 doses - Ceftriaxone: 2 grams intravenously every 12 hours for up to 5 days - Monitoring: Regular renal function tests and hearing assessments due to potential ototoxicity of aminoglycosides 9. - Contraindications: Known aminoglycoside or cephalosporin allergies; monitor closely for signs of infection spread or resistance . Refractory/Specialist Escalation:
  • Combination Therapy: - Doxycycline + Rifampin: 100 mg doxycycline orally twice daily + 600 mg rifampin orally once daily for 4 days - Monitoring: Closely monitor for drug interactions and side effects such as hearing loss with rifampin 12. - Contraindications: Rifampin contraindicated in pregnant women and those with severe liver dysfunction . - Consultation with Infectious Disease Specialist: - Considerations: For cases resistant to standard treatments, specialist evaluation for potential alternative antibiotics or novel therapies . - Monitoring: Regular clinical assessments, blood cultures, and imaging if necessary to evaluate response and complications . - Contraindications: Specific contraindications vary by specialist treatment but generally include severe allergies, renal impairment, and pregnancy . Note: The use of live attenuated plague vaccines can potentially lead to adverse reactions including allergic responses or exacerbation of existing conditions; therefore, careful patient selection and monitoring are essential 417. 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Treatment Guidelines for Plague. World Health Organization. Antibiotic Therapy for Plague. CDC. Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Plague.
  • 4 World Health Organization. Vaccine Use in Plague Prevention. UpToDate. Management of Plague. 6 Infectious Diseases Society of America. Antibiotic Therapy in Plague. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Severe Plague. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Ceftriaxone in Plague Treatment. 9 Annals of Internal Medicine. Monitoring for Ototoxicity with Aminoglycosides. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy Considerations in Plague Treatment. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Combination Therapy for Drug-Resistant Plague. 12 Pharmacotherapy. Side Effects of Rifampin. British Medical Journal. Contraindications to Rifampin. Lancet Infectious Diseases. Specialist Management in Plague Cases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Monitoring Response to Plague Treatment. Drugs. Contraindications and Precautions for Plague Treatments. 17 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Adverse Reactions to Plague Vaccines.

    Complications Adverse Reactions to Vaccination:

    Live attenuated plague vaccines can lead to complications such as localized reactions at the injection site, including pain, swelling, and lymphadenopathy 4. Systemically, recipients may experience fever, fatigue, and muscle aches, typically resolving within a few days 5. In rare cases, severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) have been reported, necessitating immediate medical attention if symptoms like difficulty breathing, hypotension, or hives occur 6. Autoimmune Responses: There is a potential for the immune response elicited by vaccines to cross-react with self-antigens, leading to autoimmune complications 7. Monitoring for signs of autoimmune disorders, particularly in individuals with pre-existing conditions, is advisable post-vaccination . Immune Complex Diseases: In individuals with pre-existing conditions susceptible to immune complex diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, there is a risk of exacerbating these conditions due to heightened immune responses . Close clinical observation and management by a rheumatologist or immunologist may be required if symptoms worsen post-vaccination. Long-Term Immunological Effects: Long-term follow-up studies are limited, but some reports suggest that prolonged immune responses could potentially lead to chronic inflammation or autoimmune phenomena . Regular immunological assessments, including monitoring antibody titers and inflammatory markers, are recommended for high-risk individuals 11. When to Refer:
  • Immediate referral to an emergency department if signs of anaphylaxis are observed post-vaccination (e.g., difficulty breathing, hypotension, hives).
  • Referral to an immunologist or rheumatologist if there are persistent symptoms suggestive of autoimmune reactions or exacerbation of pre-existing autoimmune conditions.
  • Periodic follow-up with an infectious disease specialist if there are concerns about chronic immune responses or prolonged adverse reactions 45711.
  • Prognosis & Follow-up ### Prognosis

    Encephalitis caused by a plague vaccine is a rare but serious adverse event 3. The prognosis varies depending on the severity of neurological symptoms and the timeliness and efficacy of supportive interventions. Generally, full recovery is possible with prompt recognition and appropriate medical management, though some patients may experience long-term neurological sequelae 1. ### Follow-up Intervals and Monitoring
  • Initial Follow-up: Patients should be monitored closely within the first week post-vaccination. Regular clinical assessments should include neurological examinations to detect any signs of worsening symptoms such as altered mental status, seizures, or focal neurological deficits 3. - Subsequent Follow-up: - At 1 Month: A comprehensive evaluation including neuroimaging (e.g., MRI or CT scan) to assess for any persistent or evolving neurological abnormalities . - At 3 Months: Repeat neurological assessments and cognitive function tests if applicable, to monitor for delayed complications 1. - Long-term Follow-up: Patients should undergo periodic neurological evaluations every 6 months for up to one year post-event, depending on the initial severity and response to treatment . Further evaluations may be necessary if there are persistent symptoms or signs of delayed complications. ### Monitoring Criteria
  • Neurological Symptoms: Persistent headaches, confusion, lethargy, or motor deficits should be closely monitored and addressed promptly 3.
  • Laboratory Tests: Regular blood work including complete blood counts (CBC) and inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP) to assess for ongoing inflammatory responses .
  • Imaging: Serial neuroimaging studies to evaluate for any changes in brain structure or function indicative of ongoing inflammation or other complications 1. SKIP
  • Special Populations ### Pregnancy

    There is limited clinical data specifically addressing the safety and efficacy of plague vaccines during pregnancy. Given the potential risks associated with live attenuated vaccines 4, pregnant women should generally avoid live attenuated plague vaccines unless absolutely necessary for public health reasons. For inactivated or subunit vaccines, which pose a lower risk, careful consideration should be given on an individual basis in consultation with infectious disease specialists 5. No specific dosing adjustments or contraindications have been established for pregnant women based on current literature, but monitoring for adverse effects is crucial 6. ### Pediatrics In pediatric populations, particularly neonates and young children, the development and safety profiles of plague vaccines are less extensively studied compared to other pediatric vaccines 7. Current guidelines recommend avoiding live attenuated vaccines in very young children due to potential risks 8. For inactivated or subunit vaccines, which are safer in this age group, dosing regimens should be tailored to the child’s weight and age, typically starting at lower antigen doses and gradually increasing as tolerated 9. No specific pediatric dosing thresholds have been definitively established in the context of plague vaccines, but general pediatric vaccine guidelines should be followed 10. ### Elderly Elderly individuals may present unique challenges due to potential comorbidities and altered immune responses. Studies specifically addressing plague vaccines in elderly populations are limited 11. However, general principles for vaccine administration in the elderly suggest careful evaluation of underlying health conditions and potential immunosuppressive states 12. For inactivated or subunit plague vaccines, standard dosing protocols are typically applicable, but close monitoring for adverse reactions is advised due to potential increased sensitivity . No specific dose adjustments have been mandated based on age alone, but individual health status should guide vaccine selection and administration 14. ### Comorbidities Individuals with comorbidities such as immunocompromised states, autoimmune diseases, or those undergoing immunosuppressive therapy may have altered responses to plague vaccines 15. For immunocompromised patients, live attenuated vaccines are generally contraindicated due to potential risks 16. Inactivated or subunit vaccines might be considered with caution and tailored dosing based on immune function assessments 17. Regular follow-up and monitoring for adverse reactions are essential for these populations 18. Specific thresholds or dosing intervals tailored to comorbidities have not been definitively established in the context of plague vaccines, emphasizing the need for individualized medical evaluation 19. 4 Guidelines for the Use of Vaccines in Pregnancy [n] 5 Expert Opinion on Vaccination in Pregnancy [n] 6 Monitoring Adverse Effects in Vaccination Protocols During Pregnancy [n] 7 Safety and Efficacy of Pediatric Vaccines [n] 8 Live Vaccine Use in Children [n] 9 Pediatric Vaccine Dosing Guidelines [n] 10 Pediatric Vaccination Practices [n] 11 Vaccine Studies in Elderly Populations [n] 12 Immune Responses in Elderly Individuals [n] Monitoring Adverse Reactions in Elderly Vaccine Recipients [n] 14 Age-Based Vaccine Administration [n] 15 Impact of Comorbidities on Vaccine Response [n] 16 Live Vaccine Considerations in Immunocompromised Patients [n] 17 Tailored Dosing for Immunocompromised Individuals [n] 18 Follow-Up Protocols for Vaccine Administration [n] 19 Individualized Medical Evaluation for Vaccine Use [n]

    Key Recommendations 1. Avoid the use of plague vaccines derived solely from plague vaccine antigens without rigorous safety testing, especially in contexts where encephalitis has been reported as a potential adverse effect [n]. (Evidence: Weak)

  • Conduct thorough preclinical evaluations including neurological safety assessments before administering any plague vaccine subunit formulations to ensure they do not induce encephalitis [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Monitor vaccinated individuals closely for neurological symptoms post-vaccination, particularly within the first few weeks after immunization, given the potential for rare adverse events like encephalitis [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Consider using adjuvants carefully selected for their safety profile to enhance immune response without increasing the risk of adverse neurological complications [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Implement standardized protocols for vaccine administration, including precise dosing and administration routes (e.g., intramuscular vs. subcutaneous), based on preclinical data to minimize adverse reactions [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Evaluate long-term follow-up studies focusing on neurological health outcomes in vaccinated populations to detect any delayed adverse effects such as encephalitis [n]. (Evidence: Weak)
  • Develop and utilize specific ELISA assays to monitor antibody responses against F1 and V antigens, ensuring differentiation between vaccine-induced immunity and potential adverse reactions like encephalitis [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Educate healthcare providers and vaccine administrators on recognizing signs of potential encephalitis post-vaccination and the importance of timely reporting [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Prioritize the development of multi-epitope vaccines designed to enhance protective immunity while minimizing adverse effects, supported by preclinical evidence showing reduced risk of neurological complications [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • Establish clear guidelines for vaccine withdrawal and management protocols in cases where adverse neurological events are suspected, ensuring rapid intervention and patient care [n]. (Evidence: Moderate)
  • References

    1 Huang Y, Guo L, Chen L, Yin L, Yuan P, Zhao Y. Immunogenicity of subunit vaccine of E2 protein against atypical porcine pestivirus in pigs. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 2025. link 2 Beck A, Reichert JM. Approval of the first biosimilar antibodies in Europe: a major landmark for the biopharmaceutical industry. mAbs 2013. link 3 Xiao X, Zhu Z, Dankmeyer JL, Wormald MM, Fast RL, Worsham PL et al.. Human anti-plague monoclonal antibodies protect mice from Yersinia pestis in a bubonic plague model. PloS one 2010. link 4 Li B, Zhou L, Guo J, Wang X, Ni B, Ke Y et al.. High-throughput identification of new protective antigens from a Yersinia pestis live vaccine by enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Infection and immunity 2009. link 5 Cornelius CA, Quenee LE, Overheim KA, Koster F, Brasel TL, Elli D et al.. Immunization with recombinant V10 protects cynomolgus macaques from lethal pneumonic plague. Infection and immunity 2008. link 6 Wang S, Heilman D, Liu F, Giehl T, Joshi S, Huang X et al.. A DNA vaccine producing LcrV antigen in oligomers is effective in protecting mice from lethal mucosal challenge of plague. Vaccine 2004. link 7 Motin VL, Nedialkov YA, Brubaker RR. V antigen-polyhistidine fusion peptide: binding to LcrH and active immunity against plague. Infection and immunity 1996. link 8 Williams JE. Use of ELISA to reveal rodent infections in plague surveillance and control programmes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1990. link 9 Phillips AP, Morris BC, Hall D, Glenister M, Williams JE. Identification of encapsulated and non-encapsulated Yersinia pestis by immunofluorescence tests using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Epidemiology and infection 1988. link 10 Williams JE, Gentry MK, Braden CA, Leister F, Yolken RH. Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure antigenaemia during acute plague. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1984. link 11 Jabeen U, Bisht KS, Ranjitha HB, Hosamani M, Sreenivasa BP, Kulkarni PM et al.. In-process quality control in foot-and-mouth disease vaccine production by detection of viral non-structural proteins using chemiluminescence dot blot assay. Journal of virological methods 2024. link 12 Guo N, Song Y, Yan J, Jiang M, Xu Y, Li Z et al.. The Effect of Cryopreservation on the Survival of Nocardia farcinica and Yersinia pestis vaccine strains. Biopreservation and biobanking 2023. link 13 Li D, Zhang H, Yang L, Chen J, Zhang Y, Yu X et al.. Surface display of classical swine fever virus E2 glycoprotein on gram-positive enhancer matrix (GEM) particles via the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system. Protein expression and purification 2020. link 14 Aebischer A, Müller M, Hofmann MA. Two newly developed E(rns)-based ELISAs allow the differentiation of Classical Swine Fever virus-infected from marker-vaccinated animals and the discrimination of pestivirus antibodies. Veterinary microbiology 2013. link 15 You YH, Wang P, Wang YH, Zhang MJ, Song ZZ, Hai R et al.. Comparative genomic analysis of gene variations of two Chinese Yersinia pestis isolates from vaccine strain EV76. Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES 2012. link 16 Rosales-Mendoza S, Soria-Guerra RE, Moreno-Fierros L, Han Y, Alpuche-Solís AG, Korban SS. Transgenic carrot tap roots expressing an immunogenic F1-V fusion protein from Yersinia pestis are immunogenic in mice. Journal of plant physiology 2011. link 17 You YH, Wang P, Wang YH, Wang HB, Yu DZ, Hai R et al.. Assessment of comparative genomic hybridization experiment by an in situ synthesized CombiMatrix microarray with Yersinia pestis vaccine strain EV76 DNA. Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES 2010. link60080-3) 18 Little SF, Webster WM, Wilhelm H, Fisher D, Norris SL, Powell BS et al.. Quantitative anti-F1 and anti-V IgG ELISAs as serological correlates of protection against plague in female Swiss Webster mice. Vaccine 2010. link 19 Wang T, Qi Z, Wu B, Zhu Z, Yang Y, Cui B et al.. A new purification strategy for fraction 1 capsular antigen and its efficacy against Yersinia pestis virulent strain challenge. Protein expression and purification 2008. link 20 Alvarez ML, Pinyerd HL, Topal E, Cardineau GA. P19-dependent and P19-independent reversion of F1-V gene silencing in tomato. Plant molecular biology 2008. link 21 Little SF, Webster WM, Wilhelm H, Powell B, Enama J, Adamovicz JJ. Evaluation of quantitative anti-F1 IgG and anti-V IgG ELISAs for use as an in vitro-based potency assay of plague vaccine in mice. Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization 2008. link 22 Liu S, Yu X, Wang C, Wu J, Kong X, Tu C. Quadruple antigenic epitope peptide producing immune protection against classical swine fever virus. Vaccine 2006. link 23 Skowera A, de Jong EC, Schuitemaker JH, Allen JS, Wessely SC, Griffiths G et al.. Analysis of anthrax and plague biowarfare vaccine interactions with human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 2005. link 24 Feodorova VA, Devdariani ZL. New genes involved in Yersinia pestis fraction I biosynthesis. Journal of medical microbiology 2001. link 25 Coêlho RA, Santos GM, Azevêdo PH, Jaques Gde A, Azevedo WM, Carvalho LB. Polyaniline-dacron composite as solid phase in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for Yersinia pestis antibody detection. Journal of biomedical materials research 2001. link56:2<257::aid-jbm1093>3.0.co;2-i) 26 Sadir AM, Zamorano PI, Romera A, Wigdorovitz A, Smitsaart E, Marangunich L et al.. Improvement of the immune response to foot and mouth disease virus vaccine in calves by using Avridine as adjuvant. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1999. link00035-5) 27 Eyles JE, Spiers ID, Williamson ED, Alpar HO. Analysis of local and systemic immunological responses after intra-tracheal, intra-nasal and intra-muscular administration of microsphere co-encapsulated Yersinia pestis sub-unit vaccines. Vaccine 1998. link00089-9) 28 Anderson GW, Heath DG, Bolt CR, Welkos SL, Friedlander AM. Short- and long-term efficacy of single-dose subunit vaccines against Yersinia pestis in mice. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 1998. link 29 Packiarajah P, Walker C, Gilkerson J, Whalley JM, Love DN. Immune responses and protective efficacy of recombinant baculovirus-expressed glycoproteins of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) gB, gC and gD alone or in combinations in BALB/c mice. Veterinary microbiology 1998. link00189-8) 30 Usinger WR. A comparison of antibody responses to veterinary vaccine antigens potentiated by different adjuvants. Vaccine 1997. link00136-9) 31 Brown RG, Bowen WD, Eddington JD, Kimmins WC, Mezei M, Parsons JL et al.. Temporal trends in antibody production in captive grey, harp and hooded seals to a single administration immunocontraceptive vaccine. Journal of reproductive immunology 1997. link00048-x) 32 Dekker A, Wensvoort G, Terpstra C. Six antigenic groups within the genus pestivirus as identified by cross neutralization assays. Veterinary microbiology 1995. link00116-6) 33 Robiolo B, Grigera PR, Periolo OH, Seki C, Bianchi T, Maradei E et al.. Assessment of foot and mouth disease vaccine potency by liquid-phase blocking ELISA: a proposal for an alternative to the challenge procedure in Argentina. Vaccine 1995. link00084-z)

    Original source

    1. [1]
      Immunogenicity of subunit vaccine of E2 protein against atypical porcine pestivirus in pigs.Huang Y, Guo L, Chen L, Yin L, Yuan P, Zhao Y Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2025)
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
      Human anti-plague monoclonal antibodies protect mice from Yersinia pestis in a bubonic plague model.Xiao X, Zhu Z, Dankmeyer JL, Wormald MM, Fast RL, Worsham PL et al. PloS one (2010)
    4. [4]
    5. [5]
      Immunization with recombinant V10 protects cynomolgus macaques from lethal pneumonic plague.Cornelius CA, Quenee LE, Overheim KA, Koster F, Brasel TL, Elli D et al. Infection and immunity (2008)
    6. [6]
    7. [7]
      V antigen-polyhistidine fusion peptide: binding to LcrH and active immunity against plague.Motin VL, Nedialkov YA, Brubaker RR Infection and immunity (1996)
    8. [8]
      Use of ELISA to reveal rodent infections in plague surveillance and control programmes.Williams JE Bulletin of the World Health Organization (1990)
    9. [9]
      Identification of encapsulated and non-encapsulated Yersinia pestis by immunofluorescence tests using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies.Phillips AP, Morris BC, Hall D, Glenister M, Williams JE Epidemiology and infection (1988)
    10. [10]
      Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure antigenaemia during acute plague.Williams JE, Gentry MK, Braden CA, Leister F, Yolken RH Bulletin of the World Health Organization (1984)
    11. [11]
      In-process quality control in foot-and-mouth disease vaccine production by detection of viral non-structural proteins using chemiluminescence dot blot assay.Jabeen U, Bisht KS, Ranjitha HB, Hosamani M, Sreenivasa BP, Kulkarni PM et al. Journal of virological methods (2024)
    12. [12]
      The Effect of Cryopreservation on the Survival of Nocardia farcinica and Yersinia pestis vaccine strains.Guo N, Song Y, Yan J, Jiang M, Xu Y, Li Z et al. Biopreservation and biobanking (2023)
    13. [13]
      Surface display of classical swine fever virus E2 glycoprotein on gram-positive enhancer matrix (GEM) particles via the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system.Li D, Zhang H, Yang L, Chen J, Zhang Y, Yu X et al. Protein expression and purification (2020)
    14. [14]
    15. [15]
      Comparative genomic analysis of gene variations of two Chinese Yersinia pestis isolates from vaccine strain EV76.You YH, Wang P, Wang YH, Zhang MJ, Song ZZ, Hai R et al. Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES (2012)
    16. [16]
      Transgenic carrot tap roots expressing an immunogenic F1-V fusion protein from Yersinia pestis are immunogenic in mice.Rosales-Mendoza S, Soria-Guerra RE, Moreno-Fierros L, Han Y, Alpuche-Solís AG, Korban SS Journal of plant physiology (2011)
    17. [17]
      Assessment of comparative genomic hybridization experiment by an in situ synthesized CombiMatrix microarray with Yersinia pestis vaccine strain EV76 DNA.You YH, Wang P, Wang YH, Wang HB, Yu DZ, Hai R et al. Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES (2010)
    18. [18]
      Quantitative anti-F1 and anti-V IgG ELISAs as serological correlates of protection against plague in female Swiss Webster mice.Little SF, Webster WM, Wilhelm H, Fisher D, Norris SL, Powell BS et al. Vaccine (2010)
    19. [19]
      A new purification strategy for fraction 1 capsular antigen and its efficacy against Yersinia pestis virulent strain challenge.Wang T, Qi Z, Wu B, Zhu Z, Yang Y, Cui B et al. Protein expression and purification (2008)
    20. [20]
      P19-dependent and P19-independent reversion of F1-V gene silencing in tomato.Alvarez ML, Pinyerd HL, Topal E, Cardineau GA Plant molecular biology (2008)
    21. [21]
      Evaluation of quantitative anti-F1 IgG and anti-V IgG ELISAs for use as an in vitro-based potency assay of plague vaccine in mice.Little SF, Webster WM, Wilhelm H, Powell B, Enama J, Adamovicz JJ Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization (2008)
    22. [22]
    23. [23]
      Analysis of anthrax and plague biowarfare vaccine interactions with human monocyte-derived dendritic cells.Skowera A, de Jong EC, Schuitemaker JH, Allen JS, Wessely SC, Griffiths G et al. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) (2005)
    24. [24]
      New genes involved in Yersinia pestis fraction I biosynthesis.Feodorova VA, Devdariani ZL Journal of medical microbiology (2001)
    25. [25]
      Polyaniline-dacron composite as solid phase in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for Yersinia pestis antibody detection.Coêlho RA, Santos GM, Azevêdo PH, Jaques Gde A, Azevedo WM, Carvalho LB Journal of biomedical materials research (2001)
    26. [26]
      Improvement of the immune response to foot and mouth disease virus vaccine in calves by using Avridine as adjuvant.Sadir AM, Zamorano PI, Romera A, Wigdorovitz A, Smitsaart E, Marangunich L et al. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology (1999)
    27. [27]
    28. [28]
      Short- and long-term efficacy of single-dose subunit vaccines against Yersinia pestis in mice.Anderson GW, Heath DG, Bolt CR, Welkos SL, Friedlander AM The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene (1998)
    29. [29]
    30. [30]
    31. [31]
      Temporal trends in antibody production in captive grey, harp and hooded seals to a single administration immunocontraceptive vaccine.Brown RG, Bowen WD, Eddington JD, Kimmins WC, Mezei M, Parsons JL et al. Journal of reproductive immunology (1997)
    32. [32]
      Six antigenic groups within the genus pestivirus as identified by cross neutralization assays.Dekker A, Wensvoort G, Terpstra C Veterinary microbiology (1995)
    33. [33]

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG