← Back to guidelines
Obstetrics113 papers

Closed fracture of intracapsular section of femur

Last edited: 4/14/2026

Overview

Closed fracture of the intracapsular section of the femur involves a fracture that extends into the femoral neck or head, often necessitating careful management to prevent complications such as avascular necrosis and nonunion. 26

Diagnosis

  • Clinical presentation includes severe pain, inability to bear weight, and deformity in the hip region.
  • Radiographic imaging (X-ray) is essential for initial diagnosis, often supplemented by MRI or CT for detailed assessment of fracture type and displacement. 26
  • Blood tests to evaluate for fat embolism syndrome and other systemic complications may be indicated. 26
  • Management

  • Surgical Intervention: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using screws, plates, or intramedullary nailing, depending on fracture type and patient factors. 26
  • Immobilization: Post-operative immobilization with a hip spica cast or skeletal traction initially, followed by functional bracing. 26
  • Monitoring for Complications: Close monitoring for avascular necrosis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and fat embolism syndrome. Prophylactic anticoagulation may be considered for DVT prevention. 26
  • Rehabilitation: Gradual mobilization and physical therapy to restore function and prevent stiffness. 26
  • Special Populations

  • Pregnancy: Management requires careful consideration of fetal well-being and potential risks associated with anesthesia and surgery. 26
  • Elderly: Increased risk of complications such as delayed healing and comorbidities necessitating tailored surgical and post-operative care plans. 26
  • Key Recommendations

  • Surgical Fixation: Perform surgical fixation promptly for displaced intracapsular femoral fractures to optimize outcomes and reduce complications. (Evidence: Strong 26)
  • Prophylactic Measures: Implement prophylactic anticoagulation to mitigate the risk of deep vein thrombosis, especially in immobilized patients. (Evidence: Moderate 26)
  • Early Mobilization: Initiate early mobilization and physical therapy to prevent complications such as joint stiffness and muscle atrophy. (Evidence: Moderate 26)
  • Close Monitoring: Regularly monitor for signs of avascular necrosis and fat embolism syndrome, particularly in the acute phase post-fracture. (Evidence: Expert opinion 26)
  • References

    1 Barnea ER, Ramasauskaite D, Ubom AE, Di Simone N, Mueller M, Borovac-Pinheiro A et al.. FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2025. link 2 . Quality-Improvement Strategies for Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Birth: ACOG Committee Statement No. 17. Obstetrics and gynecology 2025. link 3 Manasar-Dyrbus M, Drosdzol-Cop A, Stojko S, Stojko R, Staniczek J. Strategies to reduce cesarean deliveries: surveying Polish obstetricians on external cephalic version practices. Ginekologia polska 2025. link 4 Vrachnis N, Antonakopoulos N, von Dadelszen P, Vidler M, Maroudias G, Bone J et al.. ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece through educational and behavioral interventions among maternity care providers regarding labor management: the ENGAGE stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial protocol. Trials 2024. link 5 Le Lous M, Beridot C, Baxter JSH, Huaulme A, Vasconcelos F, Stoyanov D et al.. Physical environment of the operating room during cesarean section: A systematic review. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2023. link 6 Yerrabelli RS, Peterman N, Kaptur B, Yeo E, Carpenter K. Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA. BMC research notes 2022. link 7 Luo ZC, Liu X, Wang A, Li JQ, Zheng ZH, Guiyu S et al.. Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021. link 8 Andersen BR, Rasmussen MB, Christensen KB, Engel KG, Ringsted C, Løkkegaard E et al.. Making the best of the worst: Care quality during emergency cesarean sections. PloS one 2020. link 9 Acosta T, Sutton JM, Dotters-Katz S. Improving Learners' Comfort With Cesarean Sections Through the Use of High-Fidelity, Low-Cost Simulation. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 2020. link 10 Yang M, Guo ZW, Deng CJ, Liang X, Tan GJ, Jiang J et al.. A comparative study of three different forecasting methods for trial of labor after cesarean section. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2019. link 11 Pallister M, Ballas J, Kohn J, Eppes CS, Belfort M, Davidson C. A Standardized Approach to Cesarean Surgical Technique and Its Effect on Operative Time and Surgical Morbidity. American journal of perinatology 2019. link 12 Ni L, Elsaharty A, McConachie I. Cesarean birth - What's in a name?. International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2018. link 13 Venturella R, Quaresima P, Micieli M, Rania E, Palumbo A, Visconti F et al.. Non-obstetrical indications for cesarean section: a state-of-the-art review. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2018. link 14 Castelli G, Flaherty A, Jarrett JB. PURLs: Does azithromycin have a role in cesarean sections?. The Journal of family practice 2017. link 15 Melman S, Schreurs RHP, Dirksen CD, Kwee A, Nijhuis JG, Smeets NAC et al.. Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal cesarean section care: perspective of professionals. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2017. link 16 Josipović LB, Stojkanović JD, Brković I. Analysis of Cesarean section delivery at Nova Bila Hospital according to the Robson classification. Collegium antropologicum 2015. link 17 York SL, Maizels M, Cohen E, Stoltz RS, Jamil A, McGaghie WC et al.. Development and evaluation of cesarean section surgical training using computer-enhanced visual learning. Medical teacher 2014. link 18 Josefsson A, Gunnervik C, Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G. A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section. Maternal and child health journal 2011. link 19 Fuglenes D, Oian P, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Kristiansen IS. Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves?. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2010. link 20 Ye Y, Jiang Z, Diao X, Yang D, Du G. An ontology-based hierarchical semantic modeling approach to clinical pathway workflows. Computers in biology and medicine 2009. link 21 Gunnervik C, Sydsjö G, Sydsjö A, Selling KE, Josefsson A. Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2008. link 22 Liu TC, Lin HC, Chen CS, Lee HC. Obstetrician gender and the likelihood of performing a maternal request for a cesarean delivery. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2008. link 23 Johnson D, Truman C. Hospital practice more than specialty influences the choice of regional or general anesthesia for Cesarean section. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie 2002. link 24 Studnicki J, Remmel R, Campbell R, Werner DC. The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality 1997. link 25 Wang YP, Cheng YJ, Fan SZ, Liu CC, Shih RL. Conscious sedation by low dose propofol infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica 1996. link 26 Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision. Medical care 1995. link 27 Pierre KD, Vayda E, Lomas J, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ, Anderson GM. Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian Consensus Conference Statement on Cesarean Birth. Social science & medicine (1982) 1991. link90044-d) 28 Stafford RS. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates. JAMA 1990. link 29 Goldman G, Pineault R, Bilodeau H, Blais R. Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 1990. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
      FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section.Barnea ER, Ramasauskaite D, Ubom AE, Di Simone N, Mueller M, Borovac-Pinheiro A et al. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025)
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
      Strategies to reduce cesarean deliveries: surveying Polish obstetricians on external cephalic version practices.Manasar-Dyrbus M, Drosdzol-Cop A, Stojko S, Stojko R, Staniczek J Ginekologia polska (2025)
    4. [4]
    5. [5]
      Physical environment of the operating room during cesarean section: A systematic review.Le Lous M, Beridot C, Baxter JSH, Huaulme A, Vasconcelos F, Stoyanov D et al. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2023)
    6. [6]
      Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA.Yerrabelli RS, Peterman N, Kaptur B, Yeo E, Carpenter K BMC research notes (2022)
    7. [7]
      Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.Luo ZC, Liu X, Wang A, Li JQ, Zheng ZH, Guiyu S et al. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2021)
    8. [8]
      Making the best of the worst: Care quality during emergency cesarean sections.Andersen BR, Rasmussen MB, Christensen KB, Engel KG, Ringsted C, Løkkegaard E et al. PloS one (2020)
    9. [9]
      Improving Learners' Comfort With Cesarean Sections Through the Use of High-Fidelity, Low-Cost Simulation.Acosta T, Sutton JM, Dotters-Katz S MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources (2020)
    10. [10]
      A comparative study of three different forecasting methods for trial of labor after cesarean section.Yang M, Guo ZW, Deng CJ, Liang X, Tan GJ, Jiang J et al. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (2019)
    11. [11]
      A Standardized Approach to Cesarean Surgical Technique and Its Effect on Operative Time and Surgical Morbidity.Pallister M, Ballas J, Kohn J, Eppes CS, Belfort M, Davidson C American journal of perinatology (2019)
    12. [12]
      Cesarean birth - What's in a name?Ni L, Elsaharty A, McConachie I International journal of obstetric anesthesia (2018)
    13. [13]
      Non-obstetrical indications for cesarean section: a state-of-the-art review.Venturella R, Quaresima P, Micieli M, Rania E, Palumbo A, Visconti F et al. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2018)
    14. [14]
      PURLs: Does azithromycin have a role in cesarean sections?Castelli G, Flaherty A, Jarrett JB The Journal of family practice (2017)
    15. [15]
      Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal cesarean section care: perspective of professionals.Melman S, Schreurs RHP, Dirksen CD, Kwee A, Nijhuis JG, Smeets NAC et al. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2017)
    16. [16]
      Analysis of Cesarean section delivery at Nova Bila Hospital according to the Robson classification.Josipović LB, Stojkanović JD, Brković I Collegium antropologicum (2015)
    17. [17]
      Development and evaluation of cesarean section surgical training using computer-enhanced visual learning.York SL, Maizels M, Cohen E, Stoltz RS, Jamil A, McGaghie WC et al. Medical teacher (2014)
    18. [18]
      A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section.Josefsson A, Gunnervik C, Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G Maternal and child health journal (2011)
    19. [19]
      Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves?Fuglenes D, Oian P, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Kristiansen IS Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica (2010)
    20. [20]
      An ontology-based hierarchical semantic modeling approach to clinical pathway workflows.Ye Y, Jiang Z, Diao X, Yang D, Du G Computers in biology and medicine (2009)
    21. [21]
      Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists.Gunnervik C, Sydsjö G, Sydsjö A, Selling KE, Josefsson A Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica (2008)
    22. [22]
      Obstetrician gender and the likelihood of performing a maternal request for a cesarean delivery.Liu TC, Lin HC, Chen CS, Lee HC European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2008)
    23. [23]
      Hospital practice more than specialty influences the choice of regional or general anesthesia for Cesarean section.Johnson D, Truman C Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie (2002)
    24. [24]
      The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience.Studnicki J, Remmel R, Campbell R, Werner DC American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality (1997)
    25. [25]
      Conscious sedation by low dose propofol infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.Wang YP, Cheng YJ, Fan SZ, Liu CC, Shih RL Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica (1996)
    26. [26]
      The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR Medical care (1995)
    27. [27]
      Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian Consensus Conference Statement on Cesarean Birth.Pierre KD, Vayda E, Lomas J, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ, Anderson GM Social science & medicine (1982) (1991)
    28. [28]
    29. [29]
      Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.Goldman G, Pineault R, Bilodeau H, Blais R CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne (1990)

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG