← Back to guidelines
Plastic Surgery3 papers

Supraspinatus tendinitis

Last edited:

Management

A biomechanical study [PMID:23333171] compared standard suture-bridge repair with an augmented technique including anterior fixation and found no significant differences in linear stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, or energy absorbed to failure (P > .05). However, the augmented technique showed reduced anterior gapping at ultimate load (6.4 ± 3.1 mm vs 9.4 ± 2.8 mm).

The study [PMID:23333171] demonstrated that adding an anterior suture anchor to a suture-bridge repair technique significantly reduced anterior gapping at ultimate load (P = .037), suggesting a potential benefit in minimizing gap formation.

Prognosis & Follow-up

While biomechanical data from [PMID:23333171] indicate reduced anterior gapping with augmented repairs, the study did not assess long-term clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for follow-up studies to validate these biomechanical findings in patient prognosis.

References

1 Garcia IA, Jain NS, McGarry MH, Tibone JE, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of augmentation of suture-bridge supraspinatus repair with additional anterior fixation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2013. link

1 papers cited of 3 indexed.

Original source

  1. [1]
    Biomechanical evaluation of augmentation of suture-bridge supraspinatus repair with additional anterior fixation.Garcia IA, Jain NS, McGarry MH, Tibone JE, Lee TQ Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery (2013)

HemoChat

by SPINAI

Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

© 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG