Overview
Erythema multiforme of pregnancy is a rare, acute, immune-mediated dermatologic condition characterized by distinctive target-like lesions on the skin and mucous membranes. It typically occurs during the second or third trimester and can be triggered by various factors, including infections (such as herpes simplex virus) and drug exposures. This condition is clinically significant due to its potential to cause significant morbidity, including mucosal erosions that can lead to pain and secondary infections. Pregnant women are particularly affected, with the condition potentially impacting both maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. Early recognition and management are crucial to mitigate complications and ensure optimal maternal and fetal well-being. This matters in day-to-day practice as timely intervention can prevent severe maternal morbidity and adverse pregnancy outcomes 12.Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of erythema multiforme of pregnancy involves a complex interplay of immunological mechanisms. Typically, it arises from a type III hypersensitivity reaction where immune complexes form and deposit in the skin and mucous membranes, leading to neutrophil activation and subsequent tissue damage. The exact triggers can vary, but common precipitants include reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and certain medications. In pregnant women, hormonal changes may modulate immune responses, potentially increasing susceptibility to such immune-mediated conditions. The molecular cascade often begins with antigen exposure, followed by antibody production, immune complex formation, and finally, the recruitment and activation of neutrophils, which release proteolytic enzymes causing characteristic skin lesions 2.Epidemiology
Erythema multiforme, including its pregnancy-specific variant, is relatively uncommon, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 to 10 cases per 100,000 person-years. Pregnant women appear to be at a slightly increased risk compared to the general population, though specific prevalence figures in pregnancy are limited. The condition can affect women of any age but is more frequently reported in the second and third trimesters. Geographic distribution does not show significant variations, but certain risk factors such as viral infections and medication use may vary by region. Trends over time suggest no substantial increase in incidence, though improved diagnostic criteria and reporting methods may influence observed prevalence rates 12.Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of erythema multiforme in pregnancy typically includes the hallmark target-like (iris or bull's-eye) lesions on the skin, often accompanied by mucosal involvement, particularly in the mouth and genital areas. These lesions can vary in size and are often accompanied by itching and pain. Atypical presentations may include more widespread bullous lesions or even Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in severe cases, which are red flags requiring urgent evaluation. Other symptoms might include fever, malaise, and, in severe cases, systemic involvement affecting organs such as the liver and kidneys 2.Diagnosis
Diagnosis of erythema multiforme in pregnant women relies on clinical presentation and exclusion of other dermatologic conditions. Key diagnostic criteria include:Differential Diagnosis:
Management
First-Line Management
Second-Line Management
Refractory Cases / Specialist Escalation
Contraindications:
Complications
Prognosis & Follow-up
The prognosis for erythema multiforme in pregnancy generally improves with appropriate management, often resolving within weeks to months without long-term sequelae. Prognostic indicators include the severity of mucosal involvement and response to initial treatment. Recommended follow-up includes:Special Populations
Pregnancy
Key Recommendations
References
1 Sebire NJ, Sherod C, Abbas A, Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH. Preterm delivery and growth restriction in multifetal pregnancies reduced to twins. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1997. link 2 Drugan A, O'Brien JE, Dvorin E, Krivchenia EL, Johnson MP, Sokol RJ et al.. Multiple marker screening in multifetal gestations: failure to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fetal diagnosis and therapy 1996. link 3 Arias F. Delayed delivery of multifetal pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1994. link70132-6) 4 Brandes JM, Itskovitz J, Scher A, Gershoni-Baruch R. The physical and mental development of co-sibs surviving selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1990. link 5 Sakala EP, Branson BC. Prolonged delivery-abortion interval in twin and triplet pregnancies. A report of two cases. The Journal of reproductive medicine 1987. link