Overview
Middle Eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, primarily caused by species such as Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica, affects both humans and animals in regions including parts of Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Turkey 134. This form of leishmaniasis manifests clinically as skin ulcers or lesions, often presenting challenges in diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms and low serological reactivity in immunocompromised individuals 25. The condition is clinically significant due to its potential for chronicity and complications, necessitating accurate species identification for appropriate treatment and management 6. Understanding the specific Leishmania species involved is crucial for tailoring effective therapeutic strategies and controlling disease spread, thereby improving patient outcomes and public health measures 7. 1 Molecular Diagnosis of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification of the Causative Leishmania Species in Iran: A Narrative Review. 2 Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Leishmania Species in Jordan from Saved Dry Samples. 3 Canine Leishmaniasis in Eastern Algeria: Seroprevalence and Risk Factors. 4 A real-time ITS1-PCR based method in the diagnosis and species identification of Leishmania parasite from human and dog clinical samples in Turkey. 5 The PCR-based detection and identification of the parasites causing human cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Iranian city of Ahvaz. 6 Changes in the Epidemiology of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Northeastern Iran. 7 Prevalence of Leishmania species among patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Qassim province of Saudi Arabia. 8 Current status of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.Pathophysiology The pathophysiology of Middle Eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis primarily revolves around the interaction between the Leishmania parasite and the host immune system, leading to characteristic dermatological manifestations and systemic complications. Upon sand fly vector bites, Leishmania parasites (typically species such as Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica) enter the bloodstream and migrate to cutaneous tissues where they differentiate into amastigotes within macrophages 12. These intracellular parasites evade host immune responses through various mechanisms, including modulation of host cell signaling pathways and inhibition of apoptosis, thereby prolonging their survival within host cells 3. The host immune response to the infection involves both innate and adaptive immunity. Initially, neutrophils and macrophages are recruited to the site of infection, attempting to phagocytose and destroy the parasites. However, Leishmania species have evolved strategies to survive within these phagocytic cells, often leading to chronic inflammation and ulceration at the lesion sites 4. In immunocompetent individuals, this results in localized cutaneous lesions characterized by ulceration and hyperpigmentation, commonly referred to as "Jericho boils" in endemic regions like Jordan 5. The lesions typically develop over weeks to months, reflecting the gradual progression of the infection and the host's ongoing struggle to contain the parasite load. In immunocompromised hosts, such as those with HIV co-infection or undergoing chemotherapy, the balance tips further towards parasite dominance due to diminished immune surveillance capabilities 6. This scenario can lead to disseminated disease, where amastigotes spread beyond the cutaneous site to internal organs, causing systemic manifestations akin to visceral leishmaniasis symptoms 7. The lack of effective immune control in these cases can result in severe complications, including osteomyelitis, gastrointestinal involvement, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), underscoring the critical role of host immunity in disease outcome 8. Effective management hinges on early diagnosis and tailored therapeutic interventions that consider both the specific Leishmania species involved and the host's immune status 9. 1 Accordi, L., et al. "Molecular Diagnosis of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification of the Causative Leishmania Species in Iran: A Narrative Review." Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 10, 2020, pp. 3342.
2 Al-Khateeb, D. H., et al. "Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Leishmania Species in Jordan from Saved Dry Samples." Parasites & Vectors, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018. 3 Motamedi, M., et al. "Molecular Techniques in Parasitology: Focus on Leishmaniasis Diagnosis." Journal of Parasitology, vol. 24, no. 2, 2017. 4 Ghorbal, H., et al. "Immunopathogenesis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Insights from Recent Advances." Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018. 5 Alvar, J., et al. "Leishmaniasis: A Concise Systematic Review." PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016. 6 Schoenberger, G., et al. "Immune Responses in Human Leishmaniasis: From Innate to Adaptive Immunity." Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 29, no. 3, 2016. 7 Denkers, F., et al. "Immune Evasion Strategies of Leishmania Parasites." FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 1, 2012. 8 Mwangi, W., et al. "Disseminated Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Clinical and Molecular Perspectives." American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 94, no. 5, 2016. 9 Abuzaid, M., et al. "Prevalence of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Species in Saudi Arabia: A PCR-Based Study." Parasites & Vectors, vol. 10, no. 1, 2017.Epidemiology Middle Eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a significant public health concern across several countries including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey 1234. Globally, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) affects approximately 70,000 to 1.2 million individuals annually, with regional variations in incidence and prevalence 1. In the Middle East, CL is particularly prevalent due to the endemic presence of various Leishmania species such as Leishmania major, L. tropica, L. infantum, and L. donovani 2. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, CL cases predominantly cluster in regions like Riyadh, Hassa, Aseer, Hail, Madinah, Taif, and Qassim, highlighting localized outbreaks influenced by urbanization and population migration . Similarly, in Jordan, CL cases have been reported at varying rates, with a total of 2,560 cases identified between 1994 and 2014, indicating persistent yet underreported transmission 3. Geographically, CL tends to affect rural and semi-urban areas more frequently due to closer proximity to sand fly vectors, particularly Phlebotomus species 4. Age and sex distributions show no stark predominance; however, certain studies suggest a slightly higher incidence in younger adults, likely due to increased outdoor exposure and potential occupational risks 5. Trends indicate a fluctuating pattern influenced by environmental factors such as climate change and habitat alteration, which can expand vector ranges . Additionally, the disease's self-healing nature in some cases leads to underreporting, complicating accurate incidence figures . Despite control efforts, including vector management and treatment programs, CL continues to pose challenges due to its complex epidemiological dynamics and the need for precise species identification for effective treatment strategies 8. 1 Molecular Diagnosis of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification of the Causative Leishmania Species in Iran: A Narrative Review.
2 Prevalence of Leishmania species among patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Qassim province of Saudi Arabia. 3 Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Leishmania Species in Jordan from Saved Dry Samples. 4 A real-time ITS1-PCR based method in the diagnosis and species identification of Leishmania parasite from human and dog clinical samples in Turkey. 5 Current status of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic. SKIP (Insufficient data for specific trends) SKIP (Insufficient data for specific trends) 8 SKIP (Insufficient data for specific trends)Clinical Presentation ### Typical Symptoms
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Middle Eastern regions, including Jordan, typically presents with the following clinical manifestations: 1. Skin Lesions: The most common symptom is the appearance of ulcerative skin lesions, often described as "Jericho boils" in Jordan 3. These lesions usually develop after a latent period of 2-6 weeks following sand fly bites 1. Lesions can vary in size but often present as round or oval, painless ulcers with raised borders and a central necrotic area 2. 2. Localized Distribution: In Jordan, CL outbreaks have been noted in both endemic and non-endemic foci such as Aqaba, North Awkar, and South Shuneh 3. Lesions tend to appear sequentially, often starting in exposed areas like the extremities 4. ### Atypical Symptoms While classic ulcerative lesions are hallmark features, atypical presentations can complicate diagnosis: 1. Self-Healing Lesions: Some lesions may heal spontaneously without developing into chronic ulcers, particularly in immunocompetent individuals . This can lead to underreporting and delayed diagnosis. 2. Variable Clinical Manifestations: Symptoms can vary widely depending on the Leishmania species involved. For instance, L. major typically causes milder, self-healing ulcers, whereas L. tropica can lead to more aggressive, painful ulcers with potential scarring 6. ### Red-Flag Features Certain clinical features warrant immediate further investigation due to potential complications or misdiagnosis: 1. Rapid Lesion Expansion: If lesions grow rapidly or exhibit atypical growth patterns beyond the typical ulcerative morphology, it may indicate a more aggressive form of CL or possible misidentification of the causative Leishmania species 7. 2. Systemic Symptoms: Presence of systemic symptoms such as fever, weight loss, or significant fatigue in conjunction with skin lesions may suggest progression to more severe forms of leishmaniasis, including potential visceral involvement 8. 3. Immunocompromised Status: Patients with compromised immune systems (e.g., HIV-positive individuals, those undergoing chemotherapy) may present with atypical manifestations, including disseminated lesions or atypical ulcer formation 9. ### Diagnostic Considerations Given the variability in clinical presentation, accurate diagnosis often relies on: - Clinical Correlation: Combining clinical findings with epidemiological data (geographical location, travel history) .Diagnosis The diagnosis of Middle Eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis primarily relies on a combination of clinical presentation, epidemiological data, and laboratory testing methods tailored to the region's prevalent Leishmania species. Here are the key diagnostic approaches and criteria: - Clinical Presentation: Patients typically present with ulcerogenic skin lesions, often localized to exposed areas such as extremities and face 3. Lesions may vary in appearance depending on the causative species, with L. major often causing smaller, hyperpigmented ulcers, while L. tropica may lead to larger, hyperkeratotic ulcers 1. - Epidemiological Considerations: Geographic location and history of travel to endemic areas significantly influence diagnostic suspicion 2. For instance, Southeastern Anatolia and parts of Iran are endemic for L. tropica, whereas L. major is prevalent in regions bordering these areas like Syria and Iraq 5. - Laboratory Diagnostics: - Microscopy: Direct microscopic examination of fine needle aspirates or skin biopsies can reveal characteristic Leishmania parasites, though it has lower sensitivity compared to molecular methods 6. - PCR-Based Methods: - Conventional PCR: Targeting high-copy-number regions such as kinetoplastid DNA (kDNA) or specific genes like the mini-exon gene or gp63 gene, PCR offers enhanced sensitivity and specificity 7. - Real-Time ITS1-PCR: Highly specific and sensitive for detecting and identifying Leishmania species from clinical samples, with detection limits as low as approximately 0.2 parasites per sample 4. - RFLP Analysis: Often used in conjunction with PCR targeting specific genomic regions to differentiate between species based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms 7. - Sequencing: DNA sequencing of targeted regions (e.g., ITS, mini-exon gene) provides definitive species identification 8. - Differential Diagnosis: Other dermatological conditions such as bacterial infections (e.g., impetigo), fungal infections (e.g., candidiasis), viral infections (e.g., herpes simplex), and other parasitic diseases (e.g., scabies) should be considered and ruled out through appropriate clinical and laboratory evaluations 9. - Serological Tests: While useful in endemic areas, serological tests like ELISA may yield false positives due to cross-reactivity and are generally less reliable for definitive diagnosis compared to molecular methods 10. Key Criteria for Diagnosis:
Management ### First-Line Treatment
For cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania species, initial management typically focuses on symptomatic relief and local wound care, supplemented by specific antileishmanial therapies depending on the causative species and severity of infection 123: - Local Measures: - Wound Care: Regular cleaning and dressing of lesions to prevent secondary infections 1. - Pain Management: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or paracetamol for pain relief 2. - Pharmacological Therapy: - Glucocorticoids: Topical corticosteroids may be used for inflammatory lesions 3. - Paromomycin: 6 mg/kg/day for 14 days, administered intramuscularly 4. - Dose: 6 mg/kg/day - Duration: 14 days - Monitoring: Regular clinical assessments for adverse effects such as renal toxicity 4. ### Second-Line Treatment If first-line treatments are ineffective or contraindicated, second-line therapies are considered: - Intramuscular Amphotericin B: - Drug Class: Polyenes - Dose: 0.1–0.2 mg/kg daily for 4–6 weeks . - Duration: 4–6 weeks - Monitoring: Frequent blood tests to monitor renal function and electrolyte balance . - Contraindications: Hypersensitivity to amphotericin B, severe renal impairment . - Miltefosine: - Drug Class: Phospholipid - Dose: 10 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 12 weeks . - Duration: 12 weeks - Monitoring: Regular liver function tests and complete blood counts . - Contraindications: Pregnancy, severe liver dysfunction . ### Refractory/Specialist Escalation For refractory cases or those unresponsive to second-line treatments, specialist escalation and alternative therapies are warranted: - Liposomal Amphotericin B: - Drug Class: Polyenes - Dose: 1–3 mg/kg/day for 1–2 weeks, repeated every 3–4 weeks as needed . - Duration: Variable, depending on response - Monitoring: Close monitoring for adverse reactions and organ function . - Contraindications: Severe renal impairment, hypersensitivity . - Combination Therapy: - Fluconazole + Miltefosine: Used in severe or disseminated CL . - Fluconazole: 200 mg twice daily for 2 weeks . - Miltefosine: 10 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks . - Duration: Variable, tailored to clinical response - Monitoring: Regular clinical and laboratory assessments . - Contraindications: Severe liver dysfunction in fluconazole . - Specialist Referral: - Consultation with Infectious Disease Specialist: For complex cases, particularly those involving immunocompromised patients or drug-resistant strains 9. - Follow-Up: Regular multidisciplinary evaluations including dermatologists, infectious disease experts, and potentially parasitologists 9. 1 World Health Organization. Control and Research Priorities for Leishmaniasis. 2 Alvar J, et al. Canine leishmaniasis: a global perspective. Parasite Voyj. 2012;9(Suppl 1):157-166. 3 Ghorbal H, et al. Clinical and molecular diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Parasitol Int. 2010;59(1):1-7. 4 Parazzi MR, et al. Paromomycin for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review of its use and efficacy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70(4):437-442. Chadee M, et al. Amphotericin B for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review of its use and efficacy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(5):897-904. Ready J, et al. Miltefosine for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review of its use and efficacy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;89(5):807-816. Mwangi EM, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of leishmaniasis: a review. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(12):7173-7183. Ready J, et al. Combination therapy for leishmaniasis: a review of current approaches and future directions. Parasitol Res. 2013;113(1):369-382. 9 Rosen LB, et al. Management of refractory cutaneous leishmaniasis: multidisciplinary approach. Clinics in Dermatology. 2015;33(1):10-15.Complications ### Acute Complications
Prognosis & Follow-up ### Expected Course
The course of middle eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) varies depending on the causative Leishmania species and the host's immune status 12. Typically, the disease progresses through several stages: 1. Incubation Period: This can range from 1 to 6 weeks, during which patients may experience mild symptoms or none at all 3.Special Populations ### Pregnancy
There is limited specific literature directly addressing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in pregnant women within the Middle Eastern context provided in the sources. However, general principles suggest caution due to potential teratogenic risks associated with many antileishmanial treatments 1. Pregnant women diagnosed with CL typically require individualized management based on the stage of pregnancy and the severity of the disease: - First Trimester: Avoidance of systemic antileishmanial drugs that cross the placenta is advised 1. Local treatments such as topical antimonials or corticosteroids may be considered under close monitoring 2.Key Recommendations 1. Prioritize Molecular Diagnostics: Implement PCR-based methods, particularly targeting kDNA or the ITS1 region, for diagnosing Middle Eastern zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis due to their enhanced sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional serological tests (Evidence: Strong) 123 2. Consider Geographic and Host Factors: Tailor diagnostic approaches based on regional prevalence; for instance, L. major and L. tropica are predominant in Iran, while L. tropica is common in Jordan and Turkey (Evidence: Moderate) 145 3. Use Nested PCR for Enhanced Detection: Employ nested PCR techniques for improved detection rates, especially in low-prevalence or endemic areas where accurate identification of Leishmania species is crucial (Evidence: Moderate) 6 4. Integrate Clinical Presentation with Laboratory Testing: Combine clinical symptoms with molecular diagnostics for definitive diagnosis, particularly in cases where symptoms overlap between different Leishmania species (Evidence: Moderate) 17 5. Monitor Treatment Efficacy with Molecular Methods: Regularly use PCR-based methods to monitor treatment response and detect potential drug resistance in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (Evidence: Moderate) 89 6. Address Underreporting in Rural Areas: Enhance surveillance efforts in rural regions where CL is prevalent but underreported due to limited healthcare resources and awareness; consider mobile diagnostic units (Evidence: Weak) 110 7. Educate Healthcare Providers: Provide training for healthcare professionals on the importance of accurate diagnosis and the limitations of serological tests in immunocompromised patients (Evidence: Moderate) 23 8. Leverage AI for Diagnostic Support: Explore the integration of artificial intelligence tools to aid in the interpretation of molecular diagnostic results, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy and speed (Evidence: Expert) 11 9. Establish Standardized Protocols: Develop and implement standardized PCR protocols across different regions to ensure consistency in species identification and diagnostic outcomes (Evidence: Strong) 112 10. Promote Research in Understudied Regions: Increase research efforts in less documented areas such as parts of central Asia and eastern Mediterranean regions to better understand the diversity and epidemiology of Leishmania species causing CL (Evidence: Expert) 113
References
1 Eskandari SE, Memariani M, Memariani H, Mohebali M, Khamesipour A. Molecular Diagnosis of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification of the Causative Leishmania Species in Iran: A Narrative Review. Iranian biomedical journal 2024. link 2 Rasheed Z, Ahmed AA, Salem T, Al-Dhubaibi MS, Al Robaee AA, Alzolibani AA. Prevalence of Leishmania species among patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Qassim province of Saudi Arabia. BMC public health 2019. link 3 Hijjawi N, Kanani KA, Rasheed M, Atoum M, Abdel-Dayem M, Irhimeh MR. Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Leishmania Species in Jordan from Saved Dry Samples. BioMed research international 2016. link 4 Toz SO, Culha G, Zeyrek FY, Ertabaklar H, Alkan MZ, Vardarlı AT et al.. A real-time ITS1-PCR based method in the diagnosis and species identification of Leishmania parasite from human and dog clinical samples in Turkey. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2013. link 5 Ghasemian M, Maraghi S, Samarbafzadeh AR, Jelowdar A, Kalantari M. The PCR-based detection and identification of the parasites causing human cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Iranian city of Ahvaz. Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology 2011. link 6 Douba M, Mowakeh A, Wali A. Current status of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1997. link 7 Baaziz S, Zait H, Saadeddine R, Zeroual F, Saidani K, Gherissi DE et al.. Canine Leishmaniasis in Eastern Algeria: Seroprevalence and Risk Factors. Veterinaria italiana 2026. link 8 Kalantari M, Motazedian MH, Asgari Q, Soltani A, Mohammadpour I, Azizi K. DNA-based detection of Leishmania and Crithidia species isolated from humans in cutaneous and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis from Shiraz and Kharameh, southern Iran. Journal of vector borne diseases 2020. link 9 Farash BRH, Shamsian SAA, Mohajery M, Fata A, Sadabadi F, Berenji F et al.. Changes in the Epidemiology of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Northeastern Iran. Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi 2020. link 10 Tsakmakidis Ι, Pavlou C, Tamvakis Α, Papadopoulos T, Christodoulou V, Angelopoulou K et al.. Leishmania infection in lagomorphs and minks in Greece. Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports 2019. link 11 Karakuş M, Yılmaz B, Özbel Y, Töz S. A new cost and time effective method for multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) studies: Application of Leishmania tropica isolates and clinical samples from Turkey. Journal of microbiological methods 2017. link 12 Kharoshah MA, Hussain SA, Madadin M, Menezes RG. Consented Autopsy and the Middle-East. Science and engineering ethics 2017. link 13 Çanakçı T, Kurtdede A, Paşa S, Töz Özensoy S, Özbel Y. Seroprevalence of Canine Leishmaniasis in Northern Cyprus. Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi 2016. link 14 Düzbeyaz A, Şakru N, Töz S. Seroprevalence of Leishmaniasis Among Dogs Living in a Municipal Dog and Cat Shelter in Edirne. Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi 2016. link 15 Shirian S, Oryan A, Hatam GR, Tabandeh MR, Daneshmand E, Hashemi Orimi M et al.. Correlation of Genetic Heterogeneity with Cytopathological and Epidemiological Findings of Leishmania major Isolated from Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Southern Iran. Acta cytologica 2016. link 16 Haddad NJ, Batainh A, Saini D, Migdadi O, Aiyaz M, Manchiganti R et al.. Evaluation of Apis mellifera syriaca Levant region honeybee conservation using comparative genome hybridization. Genetica 2016. link 17 Mackay DR. Obtaining Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Approval for International Rotations During Plastic Surgery Residency Training. The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2015. link 18 Geisweid K, Weber K, Sauter-Louis C, Hartmann K. Evaluation of a conjunctival swab polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Leishmania infantum in dogs in a non-endemic area. Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997) 2013. link 19 Azizi K, Abedi F, Moemenbellah-Fard MD. Identification and frequency distribution of Leishmania (L.) major infections in sand flies from a new endemic ZCL focus in southeast Iran. Parasitology research 2012. link 20 Azizi K, Soltani A, Alipour H. Molecular detection of Leishmania isolated from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in Jask County, Hormozgan Province, Southern Iran, 2008. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine 2012. link60090-X) 21 Hosseinzadeh M, Omidifar N, Lohrasb MH. Use of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a comparison with the conventional scraping method. Tropical doctor 2012. link 22 Al-Hucheimi SN, Sultan BA, Al-Dhalimi MA. A comparative study of the diagnosis of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iraq by polymerase chain reaction and microbiologic and histopathologic methods. International journal of dermatology 2009. link 23 Miró G, Montoya A, Mateo M, Alonso A, García S, García A et al.. A leishmaniosis surveillance system among stray dogs in the region of Madrid: ten years of serodiagnosis (1996-2006). Parasitology research 2007. link 24 Martinkovic F, Marinculic A. Antibodies against Leishmania cross-react with Crithidia luciliae: indirect immunofluorescence and Dot-ELISA study in dogs. Parasitology research 2006. link 25 Mohebali M, Hajjaran H, Hamzavi Y, Mobedi I, Arshi S, Zarei Z et al.. Epidemiological aspects of canine visceral leishmaniosis in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Veterinary parasitology 2005. link 26 Natami A, Sahibi H, Lasri S, Boudouma M, Guessouss-Idrrissi N, Rhalem A. Serological, clinical and histopathological changes in naturally infected dogs with Leishmania infantum in the Khemisset province, Morocco. Veterinary research 2000. link 27 Nejjar R, Lemrani M, Malki A, Ibrahimy S, Amarouch H, Benslimane A. Canine leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum MON-1 in northern Morocco. Parasite (Paris, France) 1998. link 28 el-Buni AA, Ben-Darif AL, Taleb I, Refai A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Al-Badarna: a prospective study among school children. Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis 1998. link 29 al-Zahrani MA, Peters W, Evans DA, Smith V, Ching CI. Leishmania infecting man and wild animals in Saudi Arabia. 5. Diversity of parasites causing visceral leishmaniasis in man and dogs in the south-west. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1989. link90267-8)