Overview
Midcervical fractures of the neck of femur, also known as intracapsular fractures, involve the region just below the femoral head and above the trochanter. These fractures are particularly significant due to their potential to disrupt blood supply to the femoral head, leading to complications such as avascular necrosis and subsequent osteoarthritis. They predominantly affect elderly individuals and those with osteoporosis, given the fragility of their bones. Early and accurate management is crucial to prevent long-term disability and improve functional outcomes. Understanding the preoperative muscle status around the hip, as assessed via computed tomography (CT), is increasingly recognized as vital for predicting postoperative mobility and recovery, underscoring its importance in day-to-day clinical practice 1.Pathophysiology
Midcervical fractures of the neck of femur disrupt the structural integrity of the proximal femur, often compromising the blood supply to the femoral head, particularly through the medial and lateral circumflex arteries. This compromised blood supply can lead to avascular necrosis of the femoral head, a critical complication that significantly impacts joint function and longevity of the joint. The pathophysiology extends beyond the immediate fracture site; pre-existing muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration, as evidenced by reduced Hounsfield units (HU) on CT scans, contribute to poorer postoperative outcomes, including diminished walking ability 1. Additionally, biomechanical factors such as excessive loading on modular femoral neck designs can precipitate fractures in revision surgeries, highlighting the importance of surgical technique and implant selection in preventing secondary fractures 2.Epidemiology
The incidence of proximal femoral fractures, including midcervical types, is projected to rise dramatically with the aging population, from an estimated 1.6 million annually in 2000 to potentially 6.3 million by 2050 1. These fractures predominantly affect elderly individuals, with a notable female predominance, likely due to higher rates of osteoporosis and bone fragility in women. Geographic and socioeconomic factors can influence incidence rates, with higher rates often observed in regions with older populations and less access to preventive care. Risk factors include advanced age, female gender, osteoporosis, and previous hip injuries. Trends indicate an increasing prevalence associated with aging demographics and lifestyle factors contributing to bone fragility 14.Clinical Presentation
Patients with midcervical fractures of the neck of femur typically present with severe hip pain, inability to bear weight on the affected limb, and often exhibit a characteristic shortened and externally rotated limb (the "frozen hip" sign). Common symptoms include pain exacerbated by movement, limited range of motion, and sometimes associated neurological deficits if there is nerve compression. Red-flag features include significant swelling, warmth, and systemic signs of infection, which may indicate complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or septic arthritis. Prompt recognition of these features is crucial for timely intervention and to rule out differential diagnoses 1.Diagnosis
The diagnosis of midcervical fractures of the neck of femur primarily relies on clinical assessment followed by imaging studies. Diagnostic Approach:Specific Criteria and Tests:
Management
Initial Management
Surgical Intervention
Specifics:
Postoperative Care
Complications
Prognosis & Follow-up
The prognosis for patients with midcervical fractures varies based on factors such as age, fracture displacement, and preoperative muscle status. Prognostic indicators include successful surgical fixation, absence of avascular necrosis, and adequate postoperative rehabilitation. Recommended follow-up intervals typically include:Special Populations
Key Recommendations
References
1 Yokoyama K, Ukai T, Ogawa M, Watanabe M. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of peri-hip muscles in patients with femoral neck fracture and its impact on postoperative walking function. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2025. link 2 Zajc J, Predan J, Gubeljak N, Moličnik A, Fokter SK. Modular femoral neck failure after revision of a total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie 2019. link 3 Ng DZ, Lee KB. Unipolar versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Is There a Difference?. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015. link 4 Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 2005. link