Overview
Cemento-osseous dysplasia (COD) is a benign fibro-osseous lesion characterized by the replacement of normal bone with fibrous connective tissue that progressively mineralizes into immature bone, eventually becoming sclerotic 1. It predominantly affects individuals, particularly women, with a peak incidence in middle to late adulthood 2. COD is classified into three subtypes based on its extent and location: periapical (PCOD), focal (FocCOD), and florid (FCOD) 3. Clinically, COD is often asymptomatic and discovered incidentally through routine dental radiographs. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary interventions such as biopsies and to manage potential complications effectively. Understanding COD is vital in day-to-day practice to ensure appropriate management and prevent misdiagnosis, especially in patients requiring dental implants or orthodontic treatment 13.Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of COD involves a complex interplay of cellular and molecular processes. Initially, normal bone tissue undergoes a transformation where fibrous connective tissue replaces the bone matrix 1. Over time, this fibrous tissue undergoes gradual ossification, leading to the deposition of immature bone that eventually matures into sclerotic bone 2. The exact triggers for this transformation are not fully elucidated but may involve altered bone remodeling processes, possibly influenced by local factors such as tooth extraction or systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism 7. Histopathologically, COD exhibits overlapping features with other fibro-osseous lesions, complicating definitive diagnosis without imaging 8. The progression through distinct radiographic stages—from radiolucent to mixed and finally radiopaque—reflects the evolving nature of these lesions 1.Epidemiology
COD predominantly affects middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a notable female predominance 2. Incidence data vary, but it is considered one of the most common fibro-osseous lesions encountered in dental practice 1. The prevalence is higher in the mandible compared to the maxilla, particularly in the posterior regions 2. Geographic distribution does not appear to show significant variations, but certain populations, such as Asian women in their 40s and 50s, may exhibit higher incidences 2. Trends over time suggest a stable prevalence, though increased awareness and imaging capabilities might contribute to higher detection rates 1.Clinical Presentation
COD typically presents as an asymptomatic lesion discovered incidentally during routine dental radiographic examinations 110. Early stages often manifest as well-defined radiolucent lesions, which can mimic periapical cysts or granulomas, especially in periapical COD 1. As the lesion matures, it transitions through mixed and radiopaque stages, becoming more distinct 1. Focal COD usually involves a single site or tooth, while florid COD presents with multifocal, bilateral lesions 3. Red-flag features include pain, swelling, and signs of infection, which may indicate complications such as secondary infection or osteomyelitis 2. These symptoms necessitate prompt clinical evaluation and intervention.Diagnosis
Accurate diagnosis of COD relies heavily on radiographic evaluation, particularly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which provides detailed insights into lesion morphology and progression 1. Clinicians should consider the following criteria and tests:Management
The management of COD varies based on the subtype and presence of symptoms:Asymptomatic Cases
Symptomatic or Complicated Cases
Specific Considerations
Complications
Refer patients with signs of infection or complications to oral and maxillofacial surgeons for specialized care 2.
Prognosis & Follow-up
The prognosis for COD is generally favorable, with most cases remaining stable or progressing slowly 1. Prognostic indicators include the absence of symptoms and lack of complications 1. Recommended follow-up intervals typically involve:Special Populations
Key Recommendations
References
1 Li Y, Zheng Y, Tang B, Shi Y, Ren J, You M et al.. Why was the concordance rate of imaging and clinical diagnosis in cemento-osseous dysplasia low? A retrospective study of 55 cases. BMC oral health 2026. link 2 Kato CNAO, de Arruda JAA, Mendes PA, Neiva IM, Abreu LG, Moreno A et al.. Infected Cemento-Osseous Dysplasia: Analysis of 66 Cases and Literature Review. Head and neck pathology 2020. link 3 Cankaya AB, Erdem MA, Olgac V, Firat DR. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia of mandible. BMJ case reports 2012. link 4 Li S, Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos G. Dental implants versus removable prostheses for the management of edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: A systematic review of literature with a follow-up period of at least 3 years. International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany) 2024. link 5 Gabay M, DiPede L, Fornatora M, Yang J, Ogwo C. Treatment indications for symptomatic versus asymptomatic florid cemento-osseous dysplasia in adult patients: a systematic review. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2024. link 6 Kimura A, Kunimatsu R, Yoshimi Y, Tsuka Y, Awada T, Horie K et al.. Baicalin Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Cementoblast Lineage Cells Via the Wnt/β Catenin Signaling Pathway. Current pharmaceutical design 2018. link