← Back to guidelines
Plastic Surgery3 papers

Entire pedicle of fifth thoracic vertebra

Last edited:

Clinical Presentation

High-density clusters of perforators within 10 to 20 cm of the C7 reference point suggest reliable vascular supply for flap survival in reconstructive surgeries [PMID:25357058].

Management

In a retrospective review of 325 patients undergoing central mound breast reduction, the study reported low complication rates including seroma (0.2%), hematoma (1.1%), dehiscence (2.9%), infection (1.5%), hypertrophic scar (4.6%), nipple necrosis (0.4%), and fat necrosis (0.9%) [PMID:32590526].

The study identified a significant number of perforators in the thoracic region, including areas near the fifth thoracic vertebra, which can be utilized for pedicled flaps enabling reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity [PMID:25357058].

Through the creation of a strong, durable 'dermal cage' fixed to the chest wall, this technique narrows the breast, improves projection, and reduces tension on the inferior pedicle, minimizing postoperative wound dehiscence and long-term complications like 'bottoming out' [PMID:23358579].

Complications

Among the complications observed in the study, hypertrophic scarring occurred in 4.6% of cases, highlighting its significance as a potential adverse outcome [PMID:32590526].

Some lumbar perforators were found to cross the midline, connecting with contralateral perforators via linking vessels, which could pose challenges and increase complication risks in clinical applications [PMID:25357058].

By mitigating tension on the T junction through chest wall fixation, this method significantly lowers the risk of wound dehiscence in the early postoperative period [PMID:23358579].

Prognosis & Follow-up

The average follow-up period for patients in this study was 169 days, indicating a follow-up duration of roughly 6 months to assess outcomes and complications [PMID:32590526].

The technique effectively reduces tension on the nipple-areola complex, leading to better long-term support and reduced likelihood of breast tissue sagging over time [PMID:23358579].

References

1 DeLong MR, Chang I, Farajzadeh M, Nahabet EH, Roostaeian J, Festekjian J et al.. The Central Mound Pedicle: A Safe and Effective Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2020. link 2 Aho JM, Laungani AT, Herbig KS, Wong C, Kirchoff RW, Saint-Cyr M. Lumbar and thoracic perforators: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2014. link 3 Zic R, Vlajcic Z, Dewing D, Zambelli M, Stanec Z. The "dermal cage": a modification of the inferior pedicle breast reduction. Aesthetic plastic surgery 2013. link

Original source

  1. [1]
    The Central Mound Pedicle: A Safe and Effective Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty.DeLong MR, Chang I, Farajzadeh M, Nahabet EH, Roostaeian J, Festekjian J et al. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2020)
  2. [2]
    Lumbar and thoracic perforators: vascular anatomy and clinical implications.Aho JM, Laungani AT, Herbig KS, Wong C, Kirchoff RW, Saint-Cyr M Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2014)
  3. [3]
    The "dermal cage": a modification of the inferior pedicle breast reduction.Zic R, Vlajcic Z, Dewing D, Zambelli M, Stanec Z Aesthetic plastic surgery (2013)

HemoChat

by SPINAI

Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

© 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG