Overview
Superficial ankle injuries with infection involve soft tissue damage often accompanied by or progressing to localized infection, requiring prompt clinical assessment and management to prevent complications.Diagnosis
Management
Special Populations
Key Recommendations
References
1 Noss J, Donlon JP, Iyer R, Hallman J, Forman J. Determination of distal fibula fracture for prediction of ankle injuries. Traffic injury prevention 2024. link 2 Baltes TPA, Al Sayrafi O, Arnáiz J, Al-Naimi MR, Geertsema C, Geertsema L et al.. Acute clinical evaluation for syndesmosis injury has high diagnostic value. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2022. link 3 Harries B, Filiatrault L, Abu-Laban RB. Application of quality improvement analytic methodology in emergency medicine research: A comparative evaluation. CJEM 2019. link 4 Warrington S, Beeson M, Bradford A. Inter-rater Agreement of End-of-shift Evaluations Based on a Single Encounter. The western journal of emergency medicine 2017. link 5 Kemler E, van de Port I, Valkenberg H, Hoes AW, Backx FJ. Ankle injuries in the Netherlands: Trends over 10-25 years. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2015. link 6 Siddiqui BM, Parker S, Barry M, Moore D, Mangwani J. Consequences of a missed ankle dislocation in an adolescent. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2014. link 7 Boutis K, Grootendorst P, Willan A, Plint AC, Babyn P, Brison RJ et al.. Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 2013. link 8 Sman AD, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine 2013. link 9 Dowling SK, Wishart I. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns. CJEM 2011. link 10 Hopkins M. A comparative analysis of ENP's and SHO's in the application of the Ottawa ankle rules. International emergency nursing 2010. link 11 Boutis K, Constantine E, Schuh S, Pecaric M, Stephens D, Narayanan UG. Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2010. link 12 Kernozek T, Durall CJ, Friske A, Mussallem M. Ankle bracing, plantar-flexion angle, and ankle muscle latencies during inversion stress in healthy participants. Journal of athletic training 2008. link 13 DiStefano LJ, Padua DA, Brown CN, Guskiewicz KM. Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing. Journal of athletic training 2008. link 14 Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2005. link 15 Linklater J. Ligamentous, chondral, and osteochondral ankle injuries in athletes. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology 2004. link 16 Wedderkopp N, Kaltoft M, Holm R, Froberg K. Comparison of two intervention programmes in young female players in European handball--with and without ankle disc. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2003. link 17 Leddy JJ, Kesari A, Smolinski RJ. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule in a university sports medicine center. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2002. link 18 Plewa MC, Otto R, Verbrugge J, Buderer NM, Vaughn G, Mattevi P. Intrasound vibration testing in acute ankle injuries. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 1996. link 19 Swain RA, Holt WS. Ankle injuries. Tips from sports medicine physicians. Postgraduate medicine 1993. link 20 Wilson-MacDonald J, Williamson DM. Severe ligamentous injury of the ankle with ruptured tendo Achillis and fractured neck of talus. The Journal of trauma 1988. link