Overview
Malignant neoplasm of the pleura, commonly known as malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), is a highly aggressive cancer primarily associated with asbestos exposure. It predominantly affects the pleura, the thin membrane surrounding the lungs, but can also involve adjacent structures such as the diaphragm and pericardium. MPM is characterized by rapid progression and poor prognosis, with median survival often measured in months rather than years. The incidence is higher in older adults, particularly those with a history of occupational asbestos exposure, though sporadic cases occur without clear exposure history. Early detection and comprehensive multidisciplinary management are crucial in day-to-day practice to optimize patient outcomes and manage symptoms effectively 12.Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of malignant pleural mesothelioma involves complex molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to tumor development and progression. Asbestos fibers, once inhaled, trigger chronic inflammation and genotoxic stress in mesothelial cells lining the pleura. This exposure initiates aberrant cell signaling pathways, including activation of oncogenes like NF2 (neurofibromatosis type 2) and CDKN2A, and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Epigenetic modifications and dysregulation of cell cycle control further contribute to uncontrolled proliferation. Over time, these processes result in the formation of malignant mesothelioma cells that invade local tissues and can metastasize to distant organs. The interaction between asbestos fibers and mesothelial cells also promotes angiogenesis and immune evasion, facilitating tumor growth and spread 13.Epidemiology
Malignant pleural mesothelioma has a global incidence rate of approximately 1-2 cases per million population annually, with significant geographic variations. In regions with high asbestos exposure, such as certain parts of Europe, North America, and some Pacific Rim countries, incidence rates are notably higher. The disease predominantly affects individuals aged 60 years and older, with a male predominance due to occupational exposure patterns. Over time, incidence trends have shown an increasing pattern in populations with historical asbestos use, though recent declines are observed in areas implementing stricter regulations. Notably, studies highlight disparities in treatment approaches and outcomes between different racial groups, with black patients less frequently undergoing cancer-directed surgery compared to white patients, despite comparable survival rates 24.Clinical Presentation
Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma typically present with nonspecific symptoms that can delay diagnosis. Common manifestations include dyspnea, chest pain, and weight loss. Persistent pleural effusions often lead to dyspnea and cough, while chest pain may be due to tumor invasion into chest wall structures or pleura. Other red-flag features include unexplained ascites, pericardial effusion, and signs of superior vena cava syndrome. Advanced disease may present with more systemic symptoms like fatigue and cachexia. Early recognition of these symptoms and prompt diagnostic evaluation are essential to initiate timely intervention 12.Diagnosis
The diagnostic approach for malignant pleural mesothelioma involves a combination of imaging, cytology, and histopathology. Key steps include:Specific Criteria and Tests:
Differential Diagnosis:
Management
First-Line Treatment
Second-Line and Refractory Management
Specifics:
Contraindications:
Complications
Acute Complications
Long-Term Complications
Management Triggers:
Prognosis & Follow-Up
The prognosis for malignant pleural mesothelioma remains poor, with median survival typically ranging from 12 to 24 months post-diagnosis, depending on stage and treatment response. Prognostic indicators include early stage at diagnosis, epithelioid histology, and absence of lymph node or distant metastases. Regular follow-up involves:Special Populations
Elderly Patients
Racial Disparities
Key Recommendations
References
1 Arif R, Eichhorn F, Kallenbach K, Seppelt P, Ruhparwar A, Dienemann H et al.. Resection of thoracic malignancies infiltrating cardiac structures with use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2015. link 2 Taioli E, Wolf AS, Moline JM, Camacho-Rivera M, Flores RM. Frequency of Surgery in Black Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Disease markers 2015. link 3 Photowala F, Hatipoglu US, Garcia C. An older patient with bilateral non-traumatic haemothoraces. BMJ case reports 2012. link 4 Rosenbaum JJ, Varma S, Kirkpatrick M, Udelsman BV. Scoping Review of Operative Management of Thoracic Malignancies in Patients With Psychiatric Comorbidities. The Journal of surgical research 2025. link 5 Kamel MK, Stiles BM, Ghaly G, Rahouma M, Nasar A, Port JL et al.. Predictors of Pleural Implants in Patients With Thymic Tumors. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2016. link 6 Bölükbas S, Eberlein M, Oguzhan S, Schirren M, Sponholz S, Schirren J. Extended thymectomy including lung-sparing pleurectomy for the treatment of thymic malignancies with pleural spread. The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon 2015. link 7 Chang AS, Smedira NG, Chang CL, Benavides MM, Myhre U, Feng J et al.. Cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiation: extent of exposure influences outcome. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2007. link 8 Vanakesa T, Goldstraw P. Antero-superior approaches in the practice of thoracic surgery. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 1999. link00102-5)