HemoChat is an evidence-based AI medical search tool covering all major clinical domains, powered by 46,298 SNOMED-CT concepts, clinical guidelines, and live PubMed literature.

What medical domains does HemoChat cover?

HemoChat covers all major medical domains including cardiology, oncology, neurology, hematology, pulmonology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, psychiatry, nephrology, rheumatology, musculoskeletal, and more — with 46,298 SNOMED-CT concepts.

Is HemoChat a replacement for clinical judgment?

No. HemoChat is for clinical reference only and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals for medical decisions.

What AI technology does HemoChat use?

HemoChat uses a hybrid GraphRAG + VectorRAG pipeline combining Neo4j knowledge graphs with FAISS vector search and an LLM for answer generation.

← Back to guidelines

Urology437 papers

Irregular alveolar process

Last edited: 4/13/2026

Overview

Irregular alveolar process refers to anomalies in the alveolar bone structure, potentially impacting dental implant placement and overall oral health. These irregularities can include defects, bone loss, or abnormal bone morphology that necessitate specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches 25.

Diagnosis

Clinical examination and radiographic imaging (e.g., CBCT) to identify bone defects and morphology 25.

Assessment of bone quality and quantity to determine the extent of the irregularity 25.

Evaluation of patient history for potential causes such as trauma, infection, or congenital defects 25.

Management

Surgical Interventions: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) or distraction osteogenesis for bone defects 25.

Bone Grafting: Use of autogenous, allogenic, or xenogenic grafts to augment deficient areas 25.

Dental Implant Selection: Custom implant placement strategies to accommodate irregular alveolar structures 25.

Periodontal Therapy: Addressing underlying periodontal disease to prevent further bone loss 25.

Special Populations

Pediatrics: Limited evidence; focus on conservative management and monitoring growth patterns 25.

Elderly: Increased risk of comorbidities; tailored surgical approaches considering general health status 25.

Comorbidities: Management strategies adjusted for patients with systemic conditions affecting bone healing (e.g., osteoporosis) 25.

Key Recommendations

Utilize advanced imaging techniques (CBCT) for accurate assessment of alveolar irregularities 25 (Evidence: Strong).

Implement guided bone regeneration or bone grafting for significant bone defects to ensure stable implant placement 25 (Evidence: Strong).

Tailor surgical and therapeutic plans based on individual patient factors, including age and comorbidities 25 (Evidence: Moderate).

Prioritize comprehensive periodontal care to support bone health and prevent further alveolar process irregularities 25 (Evidence: Moderate).

References

1 Afanador-Jimenez A, Myrga JM, Abbasi B, Carlisle M, Nabavizadeh B, Hampson LA et al.. Enhancing Transparency in Urology Residency Match Process: The Importance of Standardized Letters of Recommendation. Current urology reports 2026. link 2 Erickson TS, Civantos AM, Messner AH, Chen JX, Pletcher SD. Early Evaluation of the AI-Enabled Residency Application Screening Tool Thalamus Cortex: Opportunities, Inaccuracies, and Implications for Resident Selection. The Laryngoscope 2026. link 3 Al-Mufti F, Ghaith HS, Sacknovitz A, Nawaiseh MB, Elfil M, Zarei H et al.. Publication Race: The Battle for Residency in a Competitive Landscape. Cardiology in review 2025. link 4 Love JN, Messman AM, Ilgen JS, Merritt C, Coates WC, Ander DS et al.. Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study. The western journal of emergency medicine 2024. link 5 Thomson B, Mehta S, Robinson C. Scoping review and thematic analysis of informed consent in humanitarian emergencies. BMC medical ethics 2024. link 6 Rajendran S, Patel OU, Haynes W, Yadav I, Burge K, Van Wagoner N et al.. Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail. Urology 2024. link 7 Wang KR, Shah YB, Simhal RK, Quinn A, Denisenko A, Mann E et al.. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Urology Residency Match and Geographic Proximity of Applicants. Urology 2023. link 8 Movassaghi M, Lemack GE, Broderick G, Greene K, Ibeziako O, Mirza M et al.. The Impact of the Virtual Interview on Candidate Experience and Outcomes: Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Interns Who Participated in the 2020-2021 Urology Match. Urology 2023. link 9 Grauer R, Ranti D, Greene K, Gorin MA, Menon M, Zorc S. Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology. JAMA network open 2023. link 10 Movassaghi M, Lemack GE, Badalato GM, Broderick G, Greene K, Ibeziako O et al.. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors. Journal of surgical education 2023. link 11 Edman J, Takacs EB, Tracy CR. Successful Integration of Blinded Interviews for Resident Selection: Applicant and Faculty Perspective. Urology 2023. link 12 Kim JK, Morrison B, Bylund J, Rasper A, Dropkin BM. Influencing Factors of Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match. Urology 2023. link 13 Rodriguez-Alvarez JS, Munoz-Lopez C, Khouri RK, Accioly JPE, Harwood S, Campbell SC et al.. Diversity Attracts Diversity: 2023 AUA Match Results. Urology 2023. link 14 Lin BR, Sridhar J, Uhler T. The ophthalmology residency match: a new era. Current opinion in ophthalmology 2023. link 15 Shah S, Con J, Mercado L, Smiley A, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Predictors of Matching into Anesthesiology and Surgery: Analysis of One Program's Results. Journal of surgical education 2023. link 16 Laccourreye O, Lisan Q, Vincent C, Righini C, Leboulanger N, Franco-Vidal V et al.. Keys for successful publication in Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis: A STROBE analysis of peer reviews of articles submitted in 2020-2021. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases 2023. link 17 Mitton TJ, Elder R, Hunter JB. A Simulation of the Effect of Interview Caps on the National Resident Matching Program Match in Otolaryngology. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2023. link 18 Bowe SN, Bly RA, Whipple ME, Gray ST. Residency Selection in Otolaryngology: Past, Present, & Future. The Laryngoscope 2023. link 19 Konuthula N, Epstein S, Wang X, Whipple ME, Bly RA, Bowe SN. Intersectionality of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Otolaryngology Match From 2013 to 2019. The Laryngoscope 2023. link 20 Warren CJ, Reitblat CR, Ferreri CA, Eyrich NW, Daignault-Newton S, Andino JJ et al.. Virtual "Matchmaking": Stakeholder Perspectives on the Future of the Urology Residency Match. Urology 2022. link 21 Heard JR, Wyant WA, Loeb S, Marcovich R, Dubin JM. Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match. Urology 2022. link 22 Leopold Z, Rajagopalan A, Mikhail M, Lee G, Tabakin A, Park JH et al.. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective. Urology 2022. link 23 Macdonald EJ, Gaines JM, Taubenfeld E, Labagnara K, Huang A, Winer A et al.. Analysis of Twitter Engagement in a Progressively More Competitive Urology Match: A Mixed Methods Study. Urology 2022. link 24 Traxel E, Richstone L, Brown J, Mirza M, Greene K, Thavaseelan S. Preference Signaling Pilot in the Urology Match: Outcomes and Perceptions. Urology 2022. link 25 Movassaghi M, Gillespie A, Deibert CM, Jordan M, Lemack GE, Takacs E et al.. The Impact of Visiting Rotations on the Urology Residency Match: Insights and Perspectives From the 2021-2022 Applicants. Urology 2022. link 26 Aggarwal S, Wisely CE, Syed M, Siatkowski RM, Challa P. Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of graduate medical education 2022. link 27 Fantasia J, Elsamra S, Thavaseelan S. Improving The Match: Use of Preference Signaling to Optimize the Urology Match Interview Process. Urology 2021. link 28 Love ER, Dexter F, Reminick JI, Sanford JA, Karan S. Interview Data Highlight Importance of "Same-State" on Anesthesiology Residency Match. Anesthesia and analgesia 2021. link 29 Pittman CA, Standiford TC, Bowe SN. Otolaryngology residency selection: are we doing it right?. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery 2021. link 30 Masciello M, Malekzadeh S. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective. The Laryngoscope 2021. link 31 Dagher GA, Lewandowski C, Ali SS, Barsky C, Kazzi B, Cheaito MA et al.. The International Medical Graduate and Emergency Medicine. The Journal of emergency medicine 2020. link 32 Gallahue FE, Deiorio NM, Blomkalns A, Bird SB, Dunleavy D, Fraser R et al.. The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Lessons Learned From the Residency Selection Process. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2020. link 33 Bird SB, Hern HG, Blomkalns A, Deiorio NM, Haywood Y, Hiller KM et al.. Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2019. link 34 Farber NJ, Neylan CJ, Srivastava A, Pandya SS, Kaplan A, Radadia KD et al.. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors. Urology 2019. link 35 Balen A, Fantasia J, Thavaseelan S. Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership. Current urology reports 2019. link 36 Tvina A, Spellecy R, Palatnik A. Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better?. Obstetrics and gynecology 2019. link 37 Moran KR, Schell RM, Smith KA, Abdel-Rasoul M, Lekowski RW, Rankin DD et al.. Do You Really Mean It? Assessing the Strength, Frequency, and Reliability of Applicant Commitment Statements During the Anesthesiology Residency Match. Anesthesia and analgesia 2019. link 38 Whipple ME, Law AB, Bly RA. A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs. Journal of graduate medical education 2019. link 39 Callaham M, John LK. What Does It Take to Change an Editor's Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles. Annals of emergency medicine 2018. link 40 Bhimani AD, Macrinici V, Ghelani S, Huang EY, Khan NI, Saw TA et al.. Delving Deeper Into Informed Consent: Legal and Ethical Dilemmas of Emergency Consent, Surrogate Consent, and Intraoperative Consultation. Orthopedics 2018. link 41 Sebesta EM, Lipsky MJ, Nunez M, Cooper KL, Badalato GM. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?. Urology 2018. link 42 Farber NJ, Neylan CJ, Kaplan A, Singer EA, Elsamra SE. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication. Urology 2018. link 43 DePietro DM, Kiefer RM, Redmond JW, Hoffmann JC, Trerotola SO, Nadolski GJ. The 2017 Integrated IR Residency Match: Results of a National Survey of Applicants and Program Directors. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR 2018. link 44 Balasubramani A. If we build it, they will come. Science immunology 2018. link 45 Stratil JM, Rieger MA, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study. BMC health services research 2018. link 46 Jayakumar KL, Lipoff JB. US Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Score in Dermatology Resident Selection. JAMA dermatology 2017. link 47 Yarris LM, Gottlieb M, Scott K, Sampson C, Rose E, Chan TM et al.. Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review. The western journal of emergency medicine 2017. link 48 Bowe SN, Laury AM, Gray ST. Improving Otolaryngology Residency Selection Using Principles from Personnel Psychology. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017. link 49 Pytynia KB. Why Participate in Peer Review as a Journal Manuscript Reviewer: What's in It for You?. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017. link 50 Ialongo C, Bernardini S. Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations. Biochemia medica 2017. link 51 Shkrum MJ, Kent J. An Autopsy Checklist: A Monitor of Safety and Risk Management. The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology 2016. link 52 Vossoughi SR, Macauley R, Sazama K, Fung MK. Attitudes, Practices, and Training on Informed Consent for Transfusions and Procedures: A Survey of Medical Students and Physicians. American journal of clinical pathology 2015. link 53 Rolston AM, Hartley SE, Khandelwal S, Christner JG, Cheng DF, Caty RM et al.. Effect of Doximity Residency Rankings on Residency Applicants' Program Choices. The western journal of emergency medicine 2015. link 54 Cabrera-Muffly C, Sheeder J, Abaza M. State of otolaryngology match: has competition increased since the "early" match?. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2015. link 55 Chng E, Yew EH, Schmidt HG. To what extent do tutor-related behaviours influence student learning in PBL?. Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2015. link 56 Chan T, Orlich D, Kulasegaram K, Sherbino J. Understanding communication between emergency and consulting physicians: a qualitative study that describes and defines the essential elements of the emergency department consultation-referral process for the junior learner. CJEM 2013. link 57 Weissbart SJ, Hall SJ, Fultz BR, Stock JA. The urology match as a prisoner's dilemma: a game theory perspective. Urology 2013. link 58 Perkins JN, Liang C, McFann K, Abaza MM, Streubel SO, Prager JD. Standardized letter of recommendation for otolaryngology residency selection. The Laryngoscope 2013. link 59 Houry D, Green S, Callaham M. Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC medical education 2012. link 60 Kessler CS, Afshar Y, Sardar G, Yudkowsky R, Ankel F, Schwartz A. A prospective, randomized, controlled study demonstrating a novel, effective model of transfer of care between physicians: the 5 Cs of consultation. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2012. link 61 Sbicca JA, Gorell ES, Peng DH, Lane AT. A follow-up survey of the integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2012. link 62 Shah SK, Arora S, Skipper B, Kalishman S, Timm TC, Smith AY. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. The Journal of urology 2012. link 63 Green SM, Callaham ML. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability. Annals of emergency medicine 2011. link 64 Callaham M, McCulloch C. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers. Annals of emergency medicine 2011. link 65 Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. Ophthalmology 2010. link 66 Jamjoom AA, White S, Walton SM, Hardman JG, Moppett IK. Anaesthetists' and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study. BMC medical ethics 2010. link 67 Prager JD, Myer CM, Hayes KM, Myer CM, Pensak ML. Improving methods of resident selection. The Laryngoscope 2010. link 68 Jukic M, Kvolik S, Kardum G, Kozina S, Tomic Juraga A. Knowledge and practices of obtaining informed consent for medical procedures among specialist physicians: questionnaire study in 6 Croatian hospitals. Croatian medical journal 2009. link 69 Waisel DB, Lamiani G, Sandrock NJ, Pascucci R, Truog RD, Meyer EC. Anesthesiology trainees face ethical, practical, and relational challenges in obtaining informed consent. Anesthesiology 2009. link 70 Garcia-Porres J, Ortiz-Posadas MR, Pimentel-Aguilar AB. Lean Six Sigma applied to a process innovation in a mexican health institute's imaging department. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference 2008. link 71 Lee AG, Golnik KC, Oetting TA, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R et al.. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement. Survey of ophthalmology 2008. link 72 Callaham ML, Tercier J. The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. PLoS medicine 2007. link 73 Bonner A, Greenwood J. The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study. Journal of clinical nursing 2006. link 74 Argeles PC, Weiss PM, Koller CA, Kimmel S, Hess LW. Electronic residency application service scores: do they correlate with the rank order list for the match?. The Journal of reproductive medicine 2006. link 75 Blum JM, Kheterpal S, Tremper KK. A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders. Journal of clinical anesthesia 2006. link 76 Raymond MJ, Sokol RJ, Vontver LA, Ginsburg KA. Candid candidate comments: the relationship between residency program selection factors and match list placements from ranked applicants. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005. link 77 Reisdorff EJ, Carlson DJ, Reeves M, Walker G, Hayes OW, Reynolds B. Quantitative validation of a general competency composite assessment evaluation. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2004. link 78 Lansford CD, Fisher SR, Ossoff RH, Chole RA. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery 2004. link 79 d'Hemecourt P. Assistance in the palm of your hand. Portable technology can free physicians from billing and coding chains. Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems 2001. link 80 Hua Q, Araki M, Koide Y, Shimizu K. Effects of glucose, vitamins, and DO concentrations on pyruvate fermentation using Torulopsis glabrata IFO 0005 with metabolic flux analysis. Biotechnology progress 2001. link 81 Teichman JM, Anderson KD, Dorough MM, Stein CR, Optenberg SA, Thompson IM. The urology residency matching program in practice. The Journal of urology 2000. link 82 Quick G. Time analysis of consult service emergency department admission process compared with emergency medicine service admission process. The Journal of emergency medicine 1999. link00088-8) 83 Rosenbloom S. The complexities and pitfalls of working with the countertransference. The Psychoanalytic quarterly 1998. link 84 Callaham ML, Wears RL, Waeckerle JF. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance. Annals of emergency medicine 1998. link70007-1) 85 Schafermeyer RW. Economic credentialing. Annals of emergency medicine 1997. link70043-x) 86 Pilon S, Tandberg D. Neural network and linear regression models in residency selection. The American journal of emergency medicine 1997. link90125-x) 87 Taylor CA, Weinstein L, Mayhew HE. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk. Obstetrics and gynecology 1995. link00388-T) 88 . Consent evades consensus. Hospital ethics 1994. link 89 Nyce JM, Timpka T. Work, knowledge and argument in specialist consultations: incorporating tacit knowledge into system design and development. Medical & biological engineering & computing 1993. link 90 Carroll EJ, Acevedo-Duncan M, Justice RW, Santiago L. Structure, assembly and function of the surface envelope (fertilization envelope) from eggs of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Advances in experimental medicine and biology 1986. link 91 Boyarsky S. Informed consent: recent changes in the law. The Journal of urology 1976. link58757-1) 92 Boyarsky S. Informed consent: recent changes in the law. Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons 1975. link 93 Bibring T, Baxandall J. Immunochemical studies of 22S protein from isolated mitotic apparatus. The Journal of cell biology 1969. link

Original source

[1]
Enhancing Transparency in Urology Residency Match Process: The Importance of Standardized Letters of Recommendation. — Afanador-Jimenez A, Myrga JM, Abbasi B, Carlisle M, Nabavizadeh B, Hampson LA et al. Current urology reports (2026)
[2]
Early Evaluation of the AI-Enabled Residency Application Screening Tool Thalamus Cortex: Opportunities, Inaccuracies, and Implications for Resident Selection. — Erickson TS, Civantos AM, Messner AH, Chen JX, Pletcher SD The Laryngoscope (2026)
[3]
Publication Race: The Battle for Residency in a Competitive Landscape. — Al-Mufti F, Ghaith HS, Sacknovitz A, Nawaiseh MB, Elfil M, Zarei H et al. Cardiology in review (2025)
[4]
Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study. — Love JN, Messman AM, Ilgen JS, Merritt C, Coates WC, Ander DS et al. The western journal of emergency medicine (2024)
[5]
Scoping review and thematic analysis of informed consent in humanitarian emergencies. — Thomson B, Mehta S, Robinson C BMC medical ethics (2024)
[6]
Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail. — Rajendran S, Patel OU, Haynes W, Yadav I, Burge K, Van Wagoner N et al. Urology (2024)
[7]
The Impact of COVID-19 on the Urology Residency Match and Geographic Proximity of Applicants. — Wang KR, Shah YB, Simhal RK, Quinn A, Denisenko A, Mann E et al. Urology (2023)
[8]
The Impact of the Virtual Interview on Candidate Experience and Outcomes: Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Interns Who Participated in the 2020-2021 Urology Match. — Movassaghi M, Lemack GE, Broderick G, Greene K, Ibeziako O, Mirza M et al. Urology (2023)
[9]
Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology. — Grauer R, Ranti D, Greene K, Gorin MA, Menon M, Zorc S JAMA network open (2023)
[10]
Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors. — Movassaghi M, Lemack GE, Badalato GM, Broderick G, Greene K, Ibeziako O et al. Journal of surgical education (2023)
[11]
Successful Integration of Blinded Interviews for Resident Selection: Applicant and Faculty Perspective. — Edman J, Takacs EB, Tracy CR Urology (2023)
[12]
Influencing Factors of Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match. — Kim JK, Morrison B, Bylund J, Rasper A, Dropkin BM Urology (2023)
[13]
Diversity Attracts Diversity: 2023 AUA Match Results. — Rodriguez-Alvarez JS, Munoz-Lopez C, Khouri RK, Accioly JPE, Harwood S, Campbell SC et al. Urology (2023)
[14]
The ophthalmology residency match: a new era. — Lin BR, Sridhar J, Uhler T Current opinion in ophthalmology (2023)
[15]
Predictors of Matching into Anesthesiology and Surgery: Analysis of One Program's Results. — Shah S, Con J, Mercado L, Smiley A, Weber G, Abramowicz AE Journal of surgical education (2023)
[16]
Keys for successful publication in Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis: A STROBE analysis of peer reviews of articles submitted in 2020-2021. — Laccourreye O, Lisan Q, Vincent C, Righini C, Leboulanger N, Franco-Vidal V et al. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases (2023)
[17]
A Simulation of the Effect of Interview Caps on the National Resident Matching Program Match in Otolaryngology. — Mitton TJ, Elder R, Hunter JB Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (2023)
[18]
Residency Selection in Otolaryngology: Past, Present, & Future. — Bowe SN, Bly RA, Whipple ME, Gray ST The Laryngoscope (2023)
[19]
Intersectionality of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Otolaryngology Match From 2013 to 2019. — Konuthula N, Epstein S, Wang X, Whipple ME, Bly RA, Bowe SN The Laryngoscope (2023)
[20]
Virtual "Matchmaking": Stakeholder Perspectives on the Future of the Urology Residency Match. — Warren CJ, Reitblat CR, Ferreri CA, Eyrich NW, Daignault-Newton S, Andino JJ et al. Urology (2022)
[21]
Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match. — Heard JR, Wyant WA, Loeb S, Marcovich R, Dubin JM Urology (2022)
[22]
Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective. — Leopold Z, Rajagopalan A, Mikhail M, Lee G, Tabakin A, Park JH et al. Urology (2022)
[23]
Analysis of Twitter Engagement in a Progressively More Competitive Urology Match: A Mixed Methods Study. — Macdonald EJ, Gaines JM, Taubenfeld E, Labagnara K, Huang A, Winer A et al. Urology (2022)
[24]
Preference Signaling Pilot in the Urology Match: Outcomes and Perceptions. — Traxel E, Richstone L, Brown J, Mirza M, Greene K, Thavaseelan S Urology (2022)
[25]
The Impact of Visiting Rotations on the Urology Residency Match: Insights and Perspectives From the 2021-2022 Applicants. — Movassaghi M, Gillespie A, Deibert CM, Jordan M, Lemack GE, Takacs E et al. Urology (2022)
[26]
Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic. — Aggarwal S, Wisely CE, Syed M, Siatkowski RM, Challa P Journal of graduate medical education (2022)
[27]
Improving The Match: Use of Preference Signaling to Optimize the Urology Match Interview Process. — Fantasia J, Elsamra S, Thavaseelan S Urology (2021)
[28]
Interview Data Highlight Importance of "Same-State" on Anesthesiology Residency Match. — Love ER, Dexter F, Reminick JI, Sanford JA, Karan S Anesthesia and analgesia (2021)
[29]
Otolaryngology residency selection: are we doing it right? — Pittman CA, Standiford TC, Bowe SN Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery (2021)
[30]
Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective. — Masciello M, Malekzadeh S The Laryngoscope (2021)
[31]
The International Medical Graduate and Emergency Medicine. — Dagher GA, Lewandowski C, Ali SS, Barsky C, Kazzi B, Cheaito MA et al. The Journal of emergency medicine (2020)
[32]
The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Lessons Learned From the Residency Selection Process. — Gallahue FE, Deiorio NM, Blomkalns A, Bird SB, Dunleavy D, Fraser R et al. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (2020)
[33]
Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview. — Bird SB, Hern HG, Blomkalns A, Deiorio NM, Haywood Y, Hiller KM et al. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (2019)
[34]
The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors. — Farber NJ, Neylan CJ, Srivastava A, Pandya SS, Kaplan A, Radadia KD et al. Urology (2019)
[35]
Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership. — Balen A, Fantasia J, Thavaseelan S Current urology reports (2019)
[36]
Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better? — Tvina A, Spellecy R, Palatnik A Obstetrics and gynecology (2019)
[37]
Do You Really Mean It? Assessing the Strength, Frequency, and Reliability of Applicant Commitment Statements During the Anesthesiology Residency Match. — Moran KR, Schell RM, Smith KA, Abdel-Rasoul M, Lekowski RW, Rankin DD et al. Anesthesia and analgesia (2019)
[38]
A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs. — Whipple ME, Law AB, Bly RA Journal of graduate medical education (2019)
[39]
What Does It Take to Change an Editor's Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles. — Callaham M, John LK Annals of emergency medicine (2018)
[40]
Delving Deeper Into Informed Consent: Legal and Ethical Dilemmas of Emergency Consent, Surrogate Consent, and Intraoperative Consultation. — Bhimani AD, Macrinici V, Ghelani S, Huang EY, Khan NI, Saw TA et al. Orthopedics (2018)
[41]
The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process? — Sebesta EM, Lipsky MJ, Nunez M, Cooper KL, Badalato GM Urology (2018)
[42]
The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication. — Farber NJ, Neylan CJ, Kaplan A, Singer EA, Elsamra SE Urology (2018)
[43]
The 2017 Integrated IR Residency Match: Results of a National Survey of Applicants and Program Directors. — DePietro DM, Kiefer RM, Redmond JW, Hoffmann JC, Trerotola SO, Nadolski GJ Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR (2018)
[44]
If we build it, they will come. — Balasubramani A Science immunology (2018)
[45]
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study. — Stratil JM, Rieger MA, Voelter-Mahlknecht S BMC health services research (2018)
[46]
US Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Score in Dermatology Resident Selection. — Jayakumar KL, Lipoff JB JAMA dermatology (2017)
[47]
Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review. — Yarris LM, Gottlieb M, Scott K, Sampson C, Rose E, Chan TM et al. The western journal of emergency medicine (2017)
[48]
Improving Otolaryngology Residency Selection Using Principles from Personnel Psychology. — Bowe SN, Laury AM, Gray ST Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (2017)
[49]
Why Participate in Peer Review as a Journal Manuscript Reviewer: What's in It for You? — Pytynia KB Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (2017)
[50]
Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations. — Ialongo C, Bernardini S Biochemia medica (2017)
[51]
An Autopsy Checklist: A Monitor of Safety and Risk Management. — Shkrum MJ, Kent J The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology (2016)
[52]
Attitudes, Practices, and Training on Informed Consent for Transfusions and Procedures: A Survey of Medical Students and Physicians. — Vossoughi SR, Macauley R, Sazama K, Fung MK American journal of clinical pathology (2015)
[53]
Effect of Doximity Residency Rankings on Residency Applicants' Program Choices. — Rolston AM, Hartley SE, Khandelwal S, Christner JG, Cheng DF, Caty RM et al. The western journal of emergency medicine (2015)
[54]
State of otolaryngology match: has competition increased since the "early" match? — Cabrera-Muffly C, Sheeder J, Abaza M Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (2015)
[55]
To what extent do tutor-related behaviours influence student learning in PBL? — Chng E, Yew EH, Schmidt HG Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice (2015)
[56]
Understanding communication between emergency and consulting physicians: a qualitative study that describes and defines the essential elements of the emergency department consultation-referral process for the junior learner. — Chan T, Orlich D, Kulasegaram K, Sherbino J CJEM (2013)
[57]
The urology match as a prisoner's dilemma: a game theory perspective. — Weissbart SJ, Hall SJ, Fultz BR, Stock JA Urology (2013)
[58]
Standardized letter of recommendation for otolaryngology residency selection. — Perkins JN, Liang C, McFann K, Abaza MM, Streubel SO, Prager JD The Laryngoscope (2013)
[59]
Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. — Houry D, Green S, Callaham M BMC medical education (2012)
[60]
A prospective, randomized, controlled study demonstrating a novel, effective model of transfer of care between physicians: the 5 Cs of consultation. — Kessler CS, Afshar Y, Sardar G, Yudkowsky R, Ankel F, Schwartz A Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2012)
[61]
A follow-up survey of the integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program. — Sbicca JA, Gorell ES, Peng DH, Lane AT Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2012)
[62]
Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. — Shah SK, Arora S, Skipper B, Kalishman S, Timm TC, Smith AY The Journal of urology (2012)
[63]
Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability. — Green SM, Callaham ML Annals of emergency medicine (2011)
[64]
Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers. — Callaham M, McCulloch C Annals of emergency medicine (2011)
[65]
Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. — Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ Ophthalmology (2010)
[66]
Anaesthetists' and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study. — Jamjoom AA, White S, Walton SM, Hardman JG, Moppett IK BMC medical ethics (2010)
[67]
Improving methods of resident selection. — Prager JD, Myer CM, Hayes KM, Myer CM, Pensak ML The Laryngoscope (2010)
[68]
Knowledge and practices of obtaining informed consent for medical procedures among specialist physicians: questionnaire study in 6 Croatian hospitals. — Jukic M, Kvolik S, Kardum G, Kozina S, Tomic Juraga A Croatian medical journal (2009)
[69]
Anesthesiology trainees face ethical, practical, and relational challenges in obtaining informed consent. — Waisel DB, Lamiani G, Sandrock NJ, Pascucci R, Truog RD, Meyer EC Anesthesiology (2009)
[70]
Lean Six Sigma applied to a process innovation in a mexican health institute's imaging department. — Garcia-Porres J, Ortiz-Posadas MR, Pimentel-Aguilar AB Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference (2008)
[71]
Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement. — Lee AG, Golnik KC, Oetting TA, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R et al. Survey of ophthalmology (2008)
[72]
The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. — Callaham ML, Tercier J PLoS medicine (2007)
[73]
The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study. — Bonner A, Greenwood J Journal of clinical nursing (2006)
[74]
Electronic residency application service scores: do they correlate with the rank order list for the match? — Argeles PC, Weiss PM, Koller CA, Kimmel S, Hess LW The Journal of reproductive medicine (2006)
[75]
A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders. — Blum JM, Kheterpal S, Tremper KK Journal of clinical anesthesia (2006)
[76]
Candid candidate comments: the relationship between residency program selection factors and match list placements from ranked applicants. — Raymond MJ, Sokol RJ, Vontver LA, Ginsburg KA American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2005)
[77]
Quantitative validation of a general competency composite assessment evaluation. — Reisdorff EJ, Carlson DJ, Reeves M, Walker G, Hayes OW, Reynolds B Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2004)
[78]
Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey. — Lansford CD, Fisher SR, Ossoff RH, Chole RA Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery (2004)
[79]
Assistance in the palm of your hand. Portable technology can free physicians from billing and coding chains. — d'Hemecourt P Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems (2001)
[80]
Effects of glucose, vitamins, and DO concentrations on pyruvate fermentation using Torulopsis glabrata IFO 0005 with metabolic flux analysis. — Hua Q, Araki M, Koide Y, Shimizu K Biotechnology progress (2001)
[81]
The urology residency matching program in practice. — Teichman JM, Anderson KD, Dorough MM, Stein CR, Optenberg SA, Thompson IM The Journal of urology (2000)
[82]
Time analysis of consult service emergency department admission process compared with emergency medicine service admission process. — Quick G The Journal of emergency medicine (1999)
[83]
The complexities and pitfalls of working with the countertransference. — Rosenbloom S The Psychoanalytic quarterly (1998)
[84]
Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance. — Callaham ML, Wears RL, Waeckerle JF Annals of emergency medicine (1998)
[85]
Economic credentialing. — Schafermeyer RW Annals of emergency medicine (1997)
[86]
Neural network and linear regression models in residency selection. — Pilon S, Tandberg D The American journal of emergency medicine (1997)
[87]
The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk. — Taylor CA, Weinstein L, Mayhew HE Obstetrics and gynecology (1995)
[88]
Consent evades consensus. Hospital ethics (1994)
[89]
Work, knowledge and argument in specialist consultations: incorporating tacit knowledge into system design and development. — Nyce JM, Timpka T Medical & biological engineering & computing (1993)
[90]
Structure, assembly and function of the surface envelope (fertilization envelope) from eggs of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. — Carroll EJ, Acevedo-Duncan M, Justice RW, Santiago L Advances in experimental medicine and biology (1986)
[91]
Informed consent: recent changes in the law. — Boyarsky S The Journal of urology (1976)
[92]
Informed consent: recent changes in the law. — Boyarsky S Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons (1975)
[93]
Immunochemical studies of 22S protein from isolated mitotic apparatus. — Bibring T, Baxandall J The Journal of cell biology (1969)

Share:Twitter Reddit LinkedIn