← Back to guidelines
Anesthesiology40 papers

Factitious skin disorder imposed on another

Last edited: 4/15/2026

Overview

Factitious disorder imposed on another (previously known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy) involves a caregiver fabricating or inducing physical or psychological symptoms in another individual, typically a child, to gain attention or sympathy 1.

Diagnosis

  • Presence of a caregiver consistently fabricating or inducing illness in another person 1.
  • Lack of external incentives for the behavior, focusing on the caregiver's psychological needs 1.
  • Diagnostic criteria often require ruling out other explanations for the symptoms 1.
  • No specific laboratory tests; diagnosis primarily clinical 1.
  • Management

  • Psychotherapy, particularly family therapy and individual counseling for both the caregiver and affected individual 1.
  • In severe cases, removal of the caregiver from the care environment may be necessary 1.
  • Medications are typically not indicated for the disorder itself but may be used to manage comorbid psychiatric conditions 1.
  • Special Populations

  • Pediatrics: Focus on protecting the child from harm and ensuring appropriate medical care 1.
  • Comorbidities: Address any underlying psychiatric conditions in the caregiver, such as depression or personality disorders, which may require pharmacotherapy 1.
  • Key Recommendations

  • Conduct a thorough clinical evaluation to distinguish factitious disorder imposed on another from other conditions 1 (Evidence: Strong).
  • Implement protective measures for the victim, including potential removal from the caregiver's influence 1 (Evidence: Strong).
  • Provide psychological support and therapy for both the caregiver and the affected individual 1 (Evidence: Moderate).
  • Monitor and treat any comorbid psychiatric conditions in the caregiver with appropriate psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions as needed 1 (Evidence: Moderate).
  • References

    1 . Art imitates life in a patient's tale. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) 2014. link 2 . No FMLA retaliation where employee's actions dishonest. Dietrich v. Susquehanna Valley Surgery Center, 2013 WL 433312 (M.D.Pa. 2013). Benefits quarterly 2014. link 3 Paull JD. Gilles vs Pugh and the lost letter. Anaesthesia and intensive care 2009. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
      Art imitates life in a patient's tale. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) (2014)
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
      Gilles vs Pugh and the lost letter.Paull JD Anaesthesia and intensive care (2009)

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG