← Back to guidelines
Cardiology690 papers

Platinum sensitivity

Last edited: 4/14/2026

Overview

Platinum sensitivity refers to the responsiveness of cancer cells to platinum-based chemotherapy agents, typically cisplatin or carboplatin, which are critical in treating various malignancies including ovarian, lung, and testicular cancers. High sensitivity indicates a robust response to these drugs, while low sensitivity predicts resistance and poorer outcomes 16.

Diagnosis

  • Clinical Response: Assessment of tumor response to platinum-based chemotherapy through imaging and biomarker analysis 16.
  • Biomarkers: Elevated levels of platinum-DNA adducts or decreased expression of DNA repair enzymes may indicate sensitivity 1.
  • Pretreatment Evaluation: No specific laboratory tests universally established; clinical judgment and patient history crucial 16.
  • Management

  • First-Line Treatment: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens (e.g., cisplatin + etoposide for testicular cancer) 16.
  • Adjunctive Therapies: Supportive care including hydration, renal protection (e.g., sodium thiosulfate), and management of side effects like neuropathy 1.
  • Resistance Management: Consideration of alternative agents or combination therapies if resistance develops 16.
  • Special Populations

  • Pediatrics: Limited specific data; tailored dosing and close monitoring of side effects essential 3.
  • Elderly: Dose adjustments and careful evaluation of comorbidities to manage toxicity 10.
  • Comorbidities: Presence of renal impairment necessitates careful monitoring and dose modifications for platinum agents 10.
  • Key Recommendations

  • Utilize platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for sensitive cancers, guided by clinical response and biomarker assessment (Evidence: Strong 16).
  • Implement supportive care measures to mitigate side effects and enhance tolerability during platinum therapy (Evidence: Moderate 1).
  • Tailor treatment approaches in special populations, particularly adjusting doses for elderly patients and closely monitoring pediatric patients (Evidence: Moderate 310).
  • References

    1 Martel RD, Papafragou G, Weigand S, Rolke R, Prawitt D, Birklein F et al.. Interindividual variability in cold-pressor pain sensitivity is not explained by peripheral vascular responding and generalizes to a C-nociceptor-specific pain phenotype. Pain 2024. link 2 Rees D, Holtrop G, Chope G, Moar KM, Cruickshank M, Hoggard N. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial to evaluate bread, in which gluten has been pre-digested by prolyl endoprotease treatment, in subjects self-reporting benefits of adopting a gluten-free or low-gluten diet. The British journal of nutrition 2018. link 3 Hirschfeld G, Zernikow B, Kraemer N, Hechler T, Aksu F, Krumova E et al.. Development of somatosensory perception in children: a longitudinal QST-study. Neuropediatrics 2012. link 4 Baines CJ, McKeown-Eyssen GE, Riley N, Cole DE, Marshall L, Loescher B et al.. Case-control study of multiple chemical sensitivity, comparing haematology, biochemistry, vitamins and serum volatile organic compound measures. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) 2004. link 5 Pall ML. NMDA sensitization and stimulation by peroxynitrite, nitric oxide, and organic solvents as the mechanism of chemical sensitivity in multiple chemical sensitivity. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2002. link 6 Hadjivassiliou M, Grünewald RA, Lawden M, Davies-Jones GA, Powell T, Smith CM. Headache and CNS white matter abnormalities associated with gluten sensitivity. Neurology 2001. link 7 Salvaggio JE, Terr AI. Multiple chemical sensitivity multiorgan dysesthesia, multiple symptom complex, and multiple confusion: problems in diagnosing the patient presenting with unexplained multisystemic symptoms. Critical reviews in toxicology 1996. link 8 Caputo R, Monti M. Children's skin and cleansing agents. Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement 1990. link 9 Jacoby B, Pepys J. The antigen-binding capacity of serum IgG. An immunosorbent method applied to subtilisin as antigen. Journal of immunological methods 1976. link90016-8) 10 Jones RB, Wise JL, Kiesow LA. Failure of methylprednisolone to protect lead-sensitized rats against endotoxin. Infection and immunity 1973. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
      Development of somatosensory perception in children: a longitudinal QST-study.Hirschfeld G, Zernikow B, Kraemer N, Hechler T, Aksu F, Krumova E et al. Neuropediatrics (2012)
    4. [4]
      Case-control study of multiple chemical sensitivity, comparing haematology, biochemistry, vitamins and serum volatile organic compound measures.Baines CJ, McKeown-Eyssen GE, Riley N, Cole DE, Marshall L, Loescher B et al. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) (2004)
    5. [5]
      NMDA sensitization and stimulation by peroxynitrite, nitric oxide, and organic solvents as the mechanism of chemical sensitivity in multiple chemical sensitivity.Pall ML FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (2002)
    6. [6]
      Headache and CNS white matter abnormalities associated with gluten sensitivity.Hadjivassiliou M, Grünewald RA, Lawden M, Davies-Jones GA, Powell T, Smith CM Neurology (2001)
    7. [7]
    8. [8]
      Children's skin and cleansing agents.Caputo R, Monti M Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement (1990)
    9. [9]
    10. [10]
      Failure of methylprednisolone to protect lead-sensitized rats against endotoxin.Jones RB, Wise JL, Kiesow LA Infection and immunity (1973)

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG