HemoChat

Evidence-Based AI Medical Search

← Back to guidelines
Plastic Surgery322 papers

Infection of unicondylar knee joint prosthesis

Last edited: 3 h ago

Overview

Unicondylar knee joint prosthesis infection, also known as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is a severe complication following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). It significantly impacts patient morbidity, often necessitating revision surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy, with substantial economic implications. This condition predominantly affects older adults but can occur in any patient population undergoing UKA, particularly those with pre-existing comorbidities or compromised immune systems. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial in day-to-day practice to prevent irreversible joint damage and improve patient outcomes 17.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of infection in unicondylar knee joint prostheses involves a complex interplay of host factors, bacterial virulence, and implant characteristics. Initially, bacteria, often introduced intraoperatively or hematogenously, colonize the surgical site or implant surface. Common pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Once established, these bacteria can form biofilms, which protect them from host defenses and antibiotics, leading to persistent infection 17. The host immune response, including inflammation and leukocyte infiltration, contributes to tissue destruction and osteolysis around the prosthesis. Over time, this inflammatory cascade can result in loosening of the implant, pain, and functional impairment, necessitating surgical intervention for debridement and potential reimplantation 17.

Epidemiology

The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively lower compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), estimated at approximately 0.5% to 2% 17. However, the risk factors are similar and include patient-specific factors such as advanced age, obesity, diabetes, and immunocompromised states, as well as surgical factors like prolonged operative time and contamination. Geographic variations exist, with higher revision rates noted in low-volume hospitals and among younger patients and females 23. Trends indicate an increasing number of UKAs performed, potentially leading to a rise in revision surgeries due to infection, especially as patient longevity and demand for joint replacements grow 23.

Clinical Presentation

Patients with infected unicondylar knee prostheses typically present with a constellation of symptoms including persistent pain, swelling, warmth, and erythema around the knee joint. Systemic signs such as fever, elevated inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP, ESR), and leukocytosis may also be present. Specific red-flag features include unexplained pain or mechanical symptoms worsening over time, failure of initial wound healing, and recurrent effusion. Aseptic loosening and functional decline, characterized by decreased range of motion and instability, can also signal infection 17. Early recognition of these symptoms is critical to prevent further complications and optimize treatment outcomes.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in unicondylar knee arthroplasty involves a multimodal approach combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. Key diagnostic criteria include:

  • Clinical Criteria: Persistent pain, swelling, and signs of inflammation post-operatively.
  • Laboratory Tests:
    • - Synovial Fluid Analysis: Leukocyte count ≥ 10,000 cells/μL with ≥ 60% neutrophils 7. - Blood Tests: Elevated CRP and ESR levels, though not specific 17.
  • Imaging: Radiographic signs of loosening, periosteal reaction, or soft tissue swelling. MRI and ultrasound may show increased signal intensity indicative of inflammation 17.
  • Microbiological Culture: Positive culture from synovial fluid or tissue samples 17.
  • C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR): Elevated levels, though not definitive on their own 17.

    • Differential Diagnosis:

  • Aseptic Loosening: Typically lacks systemic inflammatory markers and positive cultures.
  • Osteoarthritis Exacerbation: Presents with mechanical symptoms without systemic signs of infection.
  • Nerve Entrapment: Pain localized to specific areas without systemic inflammatory response 17.

    • Management

    Initial Management

  • Surgical Debridement: Radical surgical debridement to remove all infected tissue and implant if necessary.
  • Antibiotic Therapy: Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics tailored based on culture and sensitivity results. Commonly used classes include:
    • - Penicillins (e.g., Piperacillin-Tazobactam) - Glycopeptides (e.g., Vancomycin) - Fluoroquinolones (e.g., Ciprofloxacin) - Duration: Typically 2-6 weeks, adjusted based on clinical response and microbiological data 17.

    Second-Line Management

  • Two-Stage Revision: For persistent or recurrent infections, removal of the implant, placement of an antibiotic-loaded spacer, followed by reimplantation after a period of antibiotic therapy.
    • - Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement Spacers: Incorporate vancomycin and gentamicin, ensuring biomechanical integrity 9. - Duration: Spacer placement for 2-4 months, followed by reimplantation 9.

    Refractory Cases

  • Consultation with Infectious Disease Specialist: For complex cases requiring specialized antibiotic regimens or further surgical interventions.
  • Advanced Imaging and Monitoring: Utilize advanced imaging techniques (MRI, PET scans) to assess infection clearance and implant status 17.

    • Contraindications:

  • Severe comorbidities precluding surgery or prolonged antibiotic therapy.
  • Inadequate response to initial debridement and antibiotics 17.

    • Complications

  • Implant Loosening and Failure: Persistent infection can lead to aseptic loosening and eventual implant failure.
  • Osteolysis: Chronic inflammation results in bone resorption around the implant.
  • Prosthetic Joint Arthritis: Secondary arthritis due to altered joint mechanics post-infection.
  • Systemic Complications: Sepsis, chronic pain, and functional disability requiring referral to orthopedic and infectious disease specialists 17.

    • Prognosis & Follow-up

    The prognosis for patients with infected unicondylar knee prostheses varies based on early detection and aggressive management. Key prognostic indicators include:
  • Timeliness of Diagnosis and Treatment: Early intervention significantly improves outcomes.
  • Microbiological Factors: Presence of biofilm-forming organisms can complicate eradication.
  • Patient Factors: Immune status and comorbidities influence recovery.

    • Follow-up Intervals:

  • Short-term (1-3 months post-treatment): Regular clinical assessments, laboratory tests (CRP, ESR), and imaging to monitor infection clearance.
  • Medium-term (6-12 months): Continued clinical evaluation, functional assessments, and periodic imaging to ensure implant stability.
  • Long-term (Annually): Surveillance for signs of reinfection, wear, and loosening 17.

    • Special Populations

  • Elderly Patients: Higher risk of complications due to comorbidities; careful risk-benefit assessment required.
  • Immunocompromised Individuals: Increased susceptibility to infection; closer monitoring and tailored antibiotic therapy needed.
  • Younger Patients: Higher likelihood of revision surgeries due to longer life expectancy and potential for multiple revisions 23.

    • Key Recommendations

  • Early Surgical Debridement: Perform radical debridement promptly upon suspicion of infection (Evidence: Strong 17).
  • Synovial Fluid Analysis: Utilize synovial fluid analysis with leukocyte count ≥ 10,000 cells/μL and ≥ 60% neutrophils for diagnosis (Evidence: Strong 7).
  • Tailored Antibiotic Therapy: Initiate intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics based on culture and sensitivity results, typically for 2-6 weeks (Evidence: Moderate 17).
  • Two-Stage Revision for Recurrent Infections: Consider two-stage revision with antibiotic-loaded spacers for persistent infections (Evidence: Moderate 9).
  • Regular Follow-Up: Schedule frequent follow-up visits for monitoring infection clearance and implant stability (Evidence: Moderate 17).
  • Imaging for Monitoring: Use advanced imaging techniques (MRI, CT) to assess for signs of loosening and osteolysis (Evidence: Moderate 17).
  • Consult Infectious Disease Specialist: Engage infectious disease specialists for complex cases requiring specialized antibiotic regimens (Evidence: Moderate 17).
  • Patient Education: Educate patients on recognizing signs of reinfection and the importance of adherence to follow-up care (Evidence: Expert opinion 7).
  • Consider Hospital Volume: Higher revision rates noted in low-volume hospitals; consider referral to high-volume centers for complex cases (Evidence: Moderate 23).
  • Monitor for Comorbidities: Closely monitor patients with comorbidities for complications and adjust management accordingly (Evidence: Moderate 17).

    • References

    Showing 100 priority papers (full text preferred, most recent first) of 322 indexed.

    1 Archer JE, Adlan A, Sumathi V, Stevenson J. Can a fluorescent imaging device (MolecuLight) function as an adjunct to surgical debridement during revision knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection in a tertiary centre: a feasibility study. BMJ open 2026. link 2 De Raadt HWH, Koenraadt-van Oost I, Nijs A, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Elmans L, Van Geenen RCI. Associations between hospital characteristics, volume, and reasons for revision: a cohort study of 48,029 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties with 3,397 revisions from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta orthopaedica 2026. link 3 Hald JT, Fenstad AM, El-Galaly A, Odgaard A, Furnes ON. Similar incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Norway and Denmark: a register study of the Danish and Norwegian Knee Arthroplasty registries from 1998-2021. Acta orthopaedica 2026. link 4 Bohyn C, Zaribaf F, Janssen D, Briscoe A. Detection of simulated complications in all-polymer PEEK knee prostheses: a cadaveric imaging study using Radiography, CT, and MRI. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2026. link 5 Zou S, Xiang L, Liu H, Ji M, Xiong X, Yang T. Feasibility of medial parapatellar approach in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for moderate to severe varus deformity. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2026. link 6 Subrati A, Pacheco TA, Costa ÍA, Mello VC, Marroquin JFR, Kościński M et al.. Graphene Oxide Composites with Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene for Innovative Prostheses for Arthroplasty. ACS applied bio materials 2026. link 7 Donner S, Matziolis G, Gramlich Y, Lazic I, Schrednitzki D, Pohrt A et al.. Lower synovial leucocyte count and polymorphonuclear percentage reliably differentiate periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2026. link 8 Girotra S, Shrivastava P, Kumar A, Madan R, Grover S, Batra S et al.. How effective is mHealth-supported home-based post-knee arthroplasty rehabilitation in improving knee function and continuum of care: protocol of an open label randomised controlled trial from India. BMJ open 2025. link 9 Lallinger V, Lang J, Schloßmacher B, Göggelmann A, Burgkart R, von Eisenhart-Rothe R et al.. Biomechanical analysis of additional vancomycin in articulating knee spacers: determining the threshold for structural failure. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2025. link 10 Von Hintze J, Ponkilainen V, W-Dahl A, Hailer NP, Furnes O, Fenstad AM et al.. Erratum: Incidence of constrained condylar and hinged knee implants and mid- to long-term survivorship: a register-based study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). Acta orthopaedica 2025. link 11 Zhu J, Xia Z, Min J, Hu W, Li H, Mei C. Non-linear association between surgical duration and length of hospital stay in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis based on a retrospective cohort study in Singapore. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2025. link 12 Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Kämmer D, Hofmann UK, Eschweiler J, Bell A. Coronal axis deviations in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failures: an imaging study of patients revised for aseptic loosening. European journal of medical research 2025. link 13 Zellner AA, Watzlawik N, Roos J, Hischebeth GTR, Prangenberg C, Franz A et al.. Mid-term results after DAIR for patients with acute periprosthetic joint infections of the hip or knee. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2025. link 14 Liukkonen R, Honkanen M, Skyttä E, Eskelinen A, Karppelin M, Reito A. Clinical outcomes after revision knee arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection: A single-centre study of 359 knees at a high-volume centre with a minimum of one year follow-up. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2025. link 15 Weber M, Oppermann J, Lummer C, Dresing K, Wegmann S, Eysel P et al.. Postoperative swelling: influence of a negative pressure application in comparison to manual lymphatic drainage after total knee arthroplasty-a randomized controlled trial. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie 2025. link 16 Ma HH, Kan SA, Chiu FY, Su YP. A novel technique of intraoperative infiltration between posterior capsule and popliteal artery can reduce opioid consumption and blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery: an age- and gender-matched study. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2025. link 17 Cintra FF, Etchebehere M, Rached E, Cavenaghi G, Rahal PED, Pagnano RG. Revision knee arthroplasty using a modular system manufactured in Brazil. Clinical and radiographic results with a mean nine-year follow-up. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2024. link 18 Emonde CK, Hurschler C, Breuer A, Eggers ME, Wichmann M, Ettinger M et al.. Early monitoring of inlay wear after total knee arthroplasty on plain radiographs using model-based wear measurement. Scientific reports 2024. link 19 Zhu JW, Wang TF, Chen DS, Lei L. Safety evaluation of outpatient vs inpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024. link 20 Zhang C, Zhang Z, Lin Y, Xin Y, Li H, Lin Y et al.. A Novel Infrapatellar Fat Pad Preservation Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduced Postoperative Pain and Wound Complications. Orthopaedic surgery 2024. link 21 Chen KT, Wu TM, Lin CW, Ho CH, Huang CC, Chien CS. Early outcomes of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 140 cases from a single institute in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA 2024. link 22 Wiktor Ł, Osadnik B, Damps M. Efficacy of tranexamic acid supplemented with local infiltration analgesia in reducing blood loss in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Scientific reports 2023. link 23 Nguyen DCT, Benameur S, Mignotte M, Lavoie F. Unsupervised registration of 3D knee implant components to biplanar X-ray images. BMC medical imaging 2023. link 24 Wang X, Li X, Wang C, Geng X, Chen B, Dong Z et al.. Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study. Orthopaedic surgery 2023. link 25 Momose T, Nakano M, Nakamura Y, Maeda T, Sobajima A, Morioka S et al.. Short-term clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty with a new-type kinematic retaining implant: A comparison with preexisting cruciate retaining prosthesis. Medicine 2023. link 26 Kwak WK, Seon JK. Comparison of Survival Rate between Posterior-Stabilized and Constrained Condylar Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Analysis. Clinics in orthopedic surgery 2023. link 27 Skåden Ø, Furnes ON, Låstad Lygre SH, Badawy M, Gøthesen Ø. Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2023. link 28 Peng SH, Chen CC, Lee SH, Lin YC, Chiang JF, Chen SY et al.. Clinical outcomes of various types of revision surgeries after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2023. link 29 Ozer A. Computational wear of knee implant polyethylene insert surface under continuous dynamic loading and posterior tibial slope variation based on cadaver experiments with comparative verification. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2022. link 30 Wang R, Zhao J, Guo X, Ji B. The Effects of Periarticular Injection Cocktail in Postoperative Analgesia after Bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2022. link 31 Pamilo KJ, Haapakoski J, Sokka-Isler T, Remes V, Paloneva J. Rapid rise in prevalence of knee replacements and decrease in revision burden over past 3 decades in Finland: a register-based analysis. Acta orthopaedica 2022. link 32 Qutub A, Ghandurah A, Alzahrani A, Alghamdi A, Bakhsh TM. Functional results and survivorship after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single center experience from Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi medicine 2021. link 33 Pérez-Prieto D, Hinarejos P, Alier A, Sorlí L, Martínez S, Puig L et al.. Adherence to a reliable PJI diagnostic protocol minimizes unsuspected positive cultures rate. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2021. link 34 Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW. A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme. Acta orthopaedica 2021. link 35 Wu PJ, Lin TY, Lu YC. A Retrospective Study of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcome and the Incidence of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear in Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee. BioMed research international 2021. link 36 Wainwright TW. The current status of daycase hip and knee arthroplasty within the English National Health Service: a retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics data. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2021. link 37 Kannan A, Lewis PL, Dyer C, Jiranek WA, McMahon S. Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2021. link 38 Ma Q, Sun CJ, Wu S, Cai X. Comparison of Blood Loss between Open-Box Prosthesis and Closed-Box Prosthesis after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopaedic surgery 2021. link 39 Ye Z, Zhu W, Xi X, Wu Q. The efficacy of bidirectional barbed sutures for incision closure in total knee replacement: A protocol of randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2020. link 40 Li X, Guo D, Wang H, Zhou T. Effect and safety of intravenous versus oral acetaminophen after unicompartmental knee replacement: A protocol of randomized controlled study. Medicine 2020. link 41 Yoshikawa R, Hiranaka T, Okamoto K, Fujishiro T, Hida Y, Kamenaga T et al.. The Medial Eminence Line for Predicting Tibial Fracture Risk after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clinics in orthopedic surgery 2020. link 42 Koh YG, Lee JA, Lee HY, Suh DS, Kim HJ, Kang KT. Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2019. link 43 Koppens D, Rytter S, Munk S, Dalsgaard J, Sørensen OG, Hansen TB et al.. Equal tibial component fixation of a mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled RSA study with 2-year follow-up. Acta orthopaedica 2019. link 44 Wu J, Feng S, Chen X, Lv Z, Qu Z, Chen H et al.. Intra-Articular Injection of Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss During Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2019. link 45 Lee M, Chen J, Shi Lu C, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2019. link 46 Pongcharoen B, Chanalithichai N. Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. PloS one 2018. link 47 Badawy M, Fenstad AM, Bartz-Johannessen CA, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Robertsson O et al.. Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2017. link 48 Du Z, Chen S, Yan M, Yue B, Wang Y. Differences between native and prosthetic knees in terms of cross-sectional morphology of the femoral trochlea: a study based on three-dimensional models and virtual total knee arthroplasty. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2017. link 49 Dyrhovden GS, Lygre SHL, Badawy M, Gøthesen Ø, Furnes O. Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2017. link 50 Pancio SI, Sousa PL, Krych AJ, Abdel MP, Levy BA, Dahm DL et al.. Increased Risk of Revision, Reoperation, and Implant Constraint in TKA After Multiligament Knee Surgery. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2017. link 51 Schierjott RA, Giurea A, Neuhaus HJ, Schwiesau J, Pfaff AM, Utzschneider S et al.. Analysis of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Hinge Mechanism Articulation Components in a Rotating Hinge Knee Design: A Comparison of In Vitro and Retrieval Findings. BioMed research international 2016. link 52 Qi X, Zhang Y, Pan J, Ma L, Wang L, Wang J. Effect of Bone Cement Implantation on Haemodynamics in Elderly Patients and Preventive Measure in Cemented Hemiarthroplasty. BioMed research international 2015. link 53 Branch T, Lavoie F, Guier C, Branch E, Lording T, Stinton S et al.. Single-bundle ACL reconstruction with and without extra-articular reconstruction: evaluation with robotic lower leg rotation testing and patient satisfaction scores. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2015. link 54 Sanz-Ruiz P, Villanueva-Martínez M, Matas-Diez JA, Vaquero-Martín J. Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2015. link 55 Weber P, Schröder C, Schwiesau J, Utzschneider S, Steinbrück A, Pietschmann MF et al.. Increase in the tibial slope reduces wear after medial unicompartmental fixed-bearing arthroplasty of the knee. BioMed research international 2015. link 56 Vasso M, Schiavone Panni A. Low-grade periprosthetic knee infection: diagnosis and management. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2015. link 57 Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals. Acta orthopaedica 2014. link 58 Schroer WC, Barnes CL, Diesfeld P, LeMarr A, Ingrassia R, Morton DJ et al.. The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 59 Saragaglia D, Bonnin M, Dejour D, Deschamps G, Chol C, Chabert B et al.. Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties. International orthopaedics 2013. link 60 Angelini A, Henderson E, Trovarelli G, Ruggieri P. Is there a role for knee arthrodesis with modular endoprostheses for tumor and revision of failed endoprostheses?. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 61 Liebs TR, Herzberg W. Better quality of life after medial versus lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 62 Søe NH, Jensen NV, Nürnberg BM, Jensen AL, Koch J, Poulsen SS et al.. A novel knee prosthesis model of implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. Acta orthopaedica 2013. link 63 Biswas D, Haughom B, Mayle RE, Della Valle CJ. Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 64 Pietschmann MF, Wohlleb L, Weber P, Schmidutz F, Ficklscherer A, Gülecyüz MF et al.. Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III-what can we expect?. International orthopaedics 2013. link 65 Marmon AR, McClelland JA, Stevens-Lapsley J, Snyder-Mackler L. Single-step test for unilateral limb ability following total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2013. link 66 Choi WC, Ryu KJ, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 67 Bruni D, Iacono F, Raspugli G, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M. Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee?. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2012. link 68 Chen CA, Chen W, Goodman SB, Hargreaves BA, Koch KM, Lu W et al.. New MR imaging methods for metallic implants in the knee: artifact correction and clinical impact. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2011. link 69 Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stöckl B. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta orthopaedica 2011. link 70 Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2011. link 71 Tsuji S, Tomita T, Hashimoto H, Fujii M, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. International orthopaedics 2011. link 72 John J, Mauffrey C, May P. Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. International orthopaedics 2011. link 73 Meijerink HJ, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Kampen A, Verdonschot N. A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding. Acta orthopaedica 2010. link 74 Malin AS, Callaghan JJ, Bozic KJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Sullivan N et al.. Routine surveillance of modular PFC TKA shows increasing failures after 10 years. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2010. link 75 Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta orthopaedica 2010. link 76 Hickey MD, Anglin C, Masri BA, Hodgson AJ. Can a Matched Case-Control Methodology Efficiently Estimate Functional Relationships Between Knee Implant Alignment and Revision Risk? A Simulation-Based Analysis. The Journal of arthroplasty 2026. link 77 Vossen RJM, Ten Noever de Brauw GV, van der List JP, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Pearle AD, Zuiderbaan HA. A Greater Rate of Return to High-Impact Sports Favoring Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. The journal of knee surgery 2026. link 78 Ramos MS, Mimnaugh KD, Khan ST, Orozco-Villasenor DA, Schultz M, Piuzzi NS. Simulated Wear and Fatigue Performance of Cobalt-Chrome-Molybdenum and Co-Cr-Free Nitrided Titanium Femoral Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. The journal of knee surgery 2026. link 79 Mei A, Scazzarriello M, Brioschi D, Larghi M, Manzotti A. Extensor mechanism injury/failure following spacer dislocation in periprosthetic joint infection: a case series in a single reference center. Musculoskeletal surgery 2026. link 80 Akrivos VS, Komnos GA, Ujvari B, Hante A, Adaktylidou E, Karachalios T et al.. Long-term clinical and MRI outcomes of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation for the treatment of partial meniscal deficiency: A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2026. link 81 Liu S, Yang S, Liu G. 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instruments-Combined AI Virtual Preoperative Planning-Assisted Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE 2025. link 82 Altun MY, Flivik G, Lind T, Odgaard A, Holm CE, Petersen MM. Migration of Cemented and Uncemented Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty with an Asymmetrical Tibial Component: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a 2-Year Model-Based Radiostereometric Analysis Follow-up. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2025. link 83 Elmenawi KA, Mallinger BD, Poilvache H, Hannon CP, Abdel MP, Bedard NA. Eligibility for One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Predicts Survivorship: A Retrospective Analysis of 509 Cases. The Journal of arthroplasty 2025. link 84 Kowalski E, Pelegrinelli ARM, Catelli DS, Dervin G, Lamontagne M. Medial and lateral knee contact forces and muscle forces during sit-to-stand in patients one year after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Medical engineering & physics 2024. link 85 Hiranaka T. Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature. Expert review of medical devices 2024. link 86 Röhrl A, Klawonn F, Füchtmeier B, Wulbrand C, Gessner A, Zustin J et al.. Results of a monocentric field study: value of histology compared to sonication method and conventional tissue culture in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Infection 2024. link 87 Hiranaka T, Fukai Y, Tanaka S, Okajima T, Kanno T, Koide M et al.. Pre-milling technique improves the accuracy of posterior femoral condyle cut and reduces the tibial recut in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024. link 88 Liechti EF, Linke P, Gehrke T, Citak M, Lausmann C. Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection. International orthopaedics 2024. link 89 Yang C, Ji B, Li G, Zhang X, Xu B, Cao L. Ninety-day postoperative mortality and complications in continuous and unselected single-stage revisions for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. International orthopaedics 2024. link 90 Hsu YH, Chou YC, Chen CL, Yu YH, Lu CJ, Liu SJ. Development of novel hybrid 3D-printed degradable artificial joints incorporating electrospun pharmaceutical- and growth factor-loaded nanofibers for small joint reconstruction. Biomaterials advances 2024. link 91 Gattu N, Sutton M, Doherty DB, Lanfermeijer ND, Rodriguez-Quintana D, Ismaily SK et al.. Variations in Trochlear Morphology of Contemporary and Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses: A Review of 22 Designs. The Journal of arthroplasty 2024. link 92 Sanz-Ruiz P, Matas-Diez JA, Villanueva-Martínez M, Fernández-Fernández T, Prats-Peinado L, Vaquero J. How to remove a well-fixed metaphyseal sleeve in revision knee arthroplasty: A step-by-step surgical procedure. The Knee 2024. link 93 Muratoglu OK, Asik MD, Nepple CM, Wannomae KK, Micheli BR, Connolly RL et al.. Di-cumyl peroxide cross-linked UHMWPE/vitamin-E blend for total joint arthroplasty implants. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2024. link 94 Fennelly JT, Papalexandris S, Pope J, Yorke J, Davidson JS, Santini AJ. Fifteen-year survival analysis of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty. The Knee 2023. link 95 Wagner KR, Kaiser JT, Hevesi M, Cotter EJ, Gilat R, Meeker ZD et al.. Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Fresh-Frozen Allografts Using the Bridge-in-Slot Technique. The American journal of sports medicine 2023. link 96 Shaikh HJF, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Lavoie-Gagne O, Long WJ, Ramkumar PN. Exposure to Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence-Based Manifestations: A Primer on the Future of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty 2023. link 97 Dalli D, Fanton L, Mallia B, Wismayer PS, Buhagiar J, Mollicone P. Polyethylene wear simulation models applied to a prosthetic hip joint based on unidirectional articulations. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2023. link 98 Douiri A, Bouguennec N, Biset A, Colombet P, Laboudie P, Graveleau N. Functional scores and prosthetic implant placement are different for navigated medial UKA left in varus alignment. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2023. link 99 Karnuta JM, Shaikh HJF, Murphy MP, Brown NM, Pearle AD, Nawabi DH et al.. Artificial Intelligence for Automated Implant Identification in Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter External Validation Study Exceeding 3.5 Million Plain Radiographs. The Journal of arthroplasty 2023. link 100 Howard LC, Day CW, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes in One versus Two Component Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty 2023. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
      Can a fluorescent imaging device (MolecuLight) function as an adjunct to surgical debridement during revision knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection in a tertiary centre: a feasibility study. — Archer JE, Adlan A, Sumathi V, Stevenson J BMJ open (2026)
    2. [2]
      Associations between hospital characteristics, volume, and reasons for revision: a cohort study of 48,029 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties with 3,397 revisions from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. — De Raadt HWH, Koenraadt-van Oost I, Nijs A, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Elmans L, Van Geenen RCI Acta orthopaedica (2026)
    3. [3]
      Similar incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Norway and Denmark: a register study of the Danish and Norwegian Knee Arthroplasty registries from 1998-2021. — Hald JT, Fenstad AM, El-Galaly A, Odgaard A, Furnes ON Acta orthopaedica (2026)
    4. [4]
      Detection of simulated complications in all-polymer PEEK knee prostheses: a cadaveric imaging study using Radiography, CT, and MRI. — Bohyn C, Zaribaf F, Janssen D, Briscoe A Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2026)
    5. [5]
      Feasibility of medial parapatellar approach in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for moderate to severe varus deformity. — Zou S, Xiang L, Liu H, Ji M, Xiong X, Yang T Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2026)
    6. [6]
      Graphene Oxide Composites with Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene for Innovative Prostheses for Arthroplasty. — Subrati A, Pacheco TA, Costa ÍA, Mello VC, Marroquin JFR, Kościński M et al. ACS applied bio materials (2026)
    7. [7]
      Lower synovial leucocyte count and polymorphonuclear percentage reliably differentiate periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. — Donner S, Matziolis G, Gramlich Y, Lazic I, Schrednitzki D, Pohrt A et al. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2026)
    8. [8]
      How effective is mHealth-supported home-based post-knee arthroplasty rehabilitation in improving knee function and continuum of care: protocol of an open label randomised controlled trial from India. — Girotra S, Shrivastava P, Kumar A, Madan R, Grover S, Batra S et al. BMJ open (2025)
    9. [9]
      Biomechanical analysis of additional vancomycin in articulating knee spacers: determining the threshold for structural failure. — Lallinger V, Lang J, Schloßmacher B, Göggelmann A, Burgkart R, von Eisenhart-Rothe R et al. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2025)
    10. [10]
      Erratum: Incidence of constrained condylar and hinged knee implants and mid- to long-term survivorship: a register-based study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). — Von Hintze J, Ponkilainen V, W-Dahl A, Hailer NP, Furnes O, Fenstad AM et al. Acta orthopaedica (2025)
    11. [11]
      Non-linear association between surgical duration and length of hospital stay in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis based on a retrospective cohort study in Singapore. — Zhu J, Xia Z, Min J, Hu W, Li H, Mei C Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2025)
    12. [12]
      Coronal axis deviations in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failures: an imaging study of patients revised for aseptic loosening. — Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Kämmer D, Hofmann UK, Eschweiler J, Bell A European journal of medical research (2025)
    13. [13]
      Mid-term results after DAIR for patients with acute periprosthetic joint infections of the hip or knee. — Zellner AA, Watzlawik N, Roos J, Hischebeth GTR, Prangenberg C, Franz A et al. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2025)
    14. [14]
      Clinical outcomes after revision knee arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection: A single-centre study of 359 knees at a high-volume centre with a minimum of one year follow-up. — Liukkonen R, Honkanen M, Skyttä E, Eskelinen A, Karppelin M, Reito A Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2025)
    15. [15]
      Postoperative swelling: influence of a negative pressure application in comparison to manual lymphatic drainage after total knee arthroplasty-a randomized controlled trial. — Weber M, Oppermann J, Lummer C, Dresing K, Wegmann S, Eysel P et al. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie (2025)
    16. [16]
      A novel technique of intraoperative infiltration between posterior capsule and popliteal artery can reduce opioid consumption and blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery: an age- and gender-matched study. — Ma HH, Kan SA, Chiu FY, Su YP Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2025)
    17. [17]
      Revision knee arthroplasty using a modular system manufactured in Brazil. Clinical and radiographic results with a mean nine-year follow-up. — Cintra FF, Etchebehere M, Rached E, Cavenaghi G, Rahal PED, Pagnano RG Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) (2024)
    18. [18]
      Early monitoring of inlay wear after total knee arthroplasty on plain radiographs using model-based wear measurement. — Emonde CK, Hurschler C, Breuer A, Eggers ME, Wichmann M, Ettinger M et al. Scientific reports (2024)
    19. [19]
      Safety evaluation of outpatient vs inpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. — Zhu JW, Wang TF, Chen DS, Lei L Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2024)
    20. [20]
      A Novel Infrapatellar Fat Pad Preservation Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduced Postoperative Pain and Wound Complications. — Zhang C, Zhang Z, Lin Y, Xin Y, Li H, Lin Y et al. Orthopaedic surgery (2024)
    21. [21]
      Early outcomes of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 140 cases from a single institute in Taiwan. — Chen KT, Wu TM, Lin CW, Ho CH, Huang CC, Chien CS Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA (2024)
    22. [22]
      Efficacy of tranexamic acid supplemented with local infiltration analgesia in reducing blood loss in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. — Wiktor Ł, Osadnik B, Damps M Scientific reports (2023)
    23. [23]
      Unsupervised registration of 3D knee implant components to biplanar X-ray images. — Nguyen DCT, Benameur S, Mignotte M, Lavoie F BMC medical imaging (2023)
    24. [24]
      Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study. — Wang X, Li X, Wang C, Geng X, Chen B, Dong Z et al. Orthopaedic surgery (2023)
    25. [25]
      Short-term clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty with a new-type kinematic retaining implant: A comparison with preexisting cruciate retaining prosthesis. — Momose T, Nakano M, Nakamura Y, Maeda T, Sobajima A, Morioka S et al. Medicine (2023)
    26. [26]
      Comparison of Survival Rate between Posterior-Stabilized and Constrained Condylar Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Analysis. — Kwak WK, Seon JK Clinics in orthopedic surgery (2023)
    27. [27]
      Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021. — Skåden Ø, Furnes ON, Låstad Lygre SH, Badawy M, Gøthesen Ø Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2023)
    28. [28]
      Clinical outcomes of various types of revision surgeries after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure. — Peng SH, Chen CC, Lee SH, Lin YC, Chiang JF, Chen SY et al. BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2023)
    29. [29]
      Computational wear of knee implant polyethylene insert surface under continuous dynamic loading and posterior tibial slope variation based on cadaver experiments with comparative verification. — Ozer A BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2022)
    30. [30]
      The Effects of Periarticular Injection Cocktail in Postoperative Analgesia after Bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. — Wang R, Zhao J, Guo X, Ji B Computational and mathematical methods in medicine (2022)
    31. [31]
      Rapid rise in prevalence of knee replacements and decrease in revision burden over past 3 decades in Finland: a register-based analysis. — Pamilo KJ, Haapakoski J, Sokka-Isler T, Remes V, Paloneva J Acta orthopaedica (2022)
    32. [32]
      Functional results and survivorship after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single center experience from Saudi Arabia. — Qutub A, Ghandurah A, Alzahrani A, Alghamdi A, Bakhsh TM Annals of Saudi medicine (2021)
    33. [33]
      Adherence to a reliable PJI diagnostic protocol minimizes unsuspected positive cultures rate. — Pérez-Prieto D, Hinarejos P, Alier A, Sorlí L, Martínez S, Puig L et al. BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2021)
    34. [34]
      A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme. — Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW Acta orthopaedica (2021)
    35. [35]
      A Retrospective Study of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcome and the Incidence of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear in Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee. — Wu PJ, Lin TY, Lu YC BioMed research international (2021)
    36. [36]
      The current status of daycase hip and knee arthroplasty within the English National Health Service: a retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics data. — Wainwright TW Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (2021)
    37. [37]
      Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. — Kannan A, Lewis PL, Dyer C, Jiranek WA, McMahon S Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2021)
    38. [38]
      Comparison of Blood Loss between Open-Box Prosthesis and Closed-Box Prosthesis after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. — Ma Q, Sun CJ, Wu S, Cai X Orthopaedic surgery (2021)
    39. [39]
      The efficacy of bidirectional barbed sutures for incision closure in total knee replacement: A protocol of randomized controlled trial. — Ye Z, Zhu W, Xi X, Wu Q Medicine (2020)
    40. [40]
      Effect and safety of intravenous versus oral acetaminophen after unicompartmental knee replacement: A protocol of randomized controlled study. — Li X, Guo D, Wang H, Zhou T Medicine (2020)
    41. [41]
      The Medial Eminence Line for Predicting Tibial Fracture Risk after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. — Yoshikawa R, Hiranaka T, Okamoto K, Fujishiro T, Hida Y, Kamenaga T et al. Clinics in orthopedic surgery (2020)
    42. [42]
      Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. — Koh YG, Lee JA, Lee HY, Suh DS, Kim HJ, Kang KT Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2019)
    43. [43]
      Equal tibial component fixation of a mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled RSA study with 2-year follow-up. — Koppens D, Rytter S, Munk S, Dalsgaard J, Sørensen OG, Hansen TB et al. Acta orthopaedica (2019)
    44. [44]
      Intra-Articular Injection of Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss During Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. — Wu J, Feng S, Chen X, Lv Z, Qu Z, Chen H et al. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research (2019)
    45. [45]
      No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup. — Lee M, Chen J, Shi Lu C, Lo NN, Yeo SJ Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2019)
    46. [46]
      Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. — Pongcharoen B, Chanalithichai N PloS one (2018)
    47. [47]
      Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases. — Badawy M, Fenstad AM, Bartz-Johannessen CA, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Robertsson O et al. BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2017)
    48. [48]
      Differences between native and prosthetic knees in terms of cross-sectional morphology of the femoral trochlea: a study based on three-dimensional models and virtual total knee arthroplasty. — Du Z, Chen S, Yan M, Yue B, Wang Y BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2017)
    49. [49]
      Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades? — Dyrhovden GS, Lygre SHL, Badawy M, Gøthesen Ø, Furnes O Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2017)
    50. [50]
      Increased Risk of Revision, Reoperation, and Implant Constraint in TKA After Multiligament Knee Surgery. — Pancio SI, Sousa PL, Krych AJ, Abdel MP, Levy BA, Dahm DL et al. Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2017)
    51. [51]
      Analysis of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Hinge Mechanism Articulation Components in a Rotating Hinge Knee Design: A Comparison of In Vitro and Retrieval Findings. — Schierjott RA, Giurea A, Neuhaus HJ, Schwiesau J, Pfaff AM, Utzschneider S et al. BioMed research international (2016)
    52. [52]
      Effect of Bone Cement Implantation on Haemodynamics in Elderly Patients and Preventive Measure in Cemented Hemiarthroplasty. — Qi X, Zhang Y, Pan J, Ma L, Wang L, Wang J BioMed research international (2015)
    53. [53]
      Single-bundle ACL reconstruction with and without extra-articular reconstruction: evaluation with robotic lower leg rotation testing and patient satisfaction scores. — Branch T, Lavoie F, Guier C, Branch E, Lording T, Stinton S et al. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2015)
    54. [54]
      Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis. — Sanz-Ruiz P, Villanueva-Martínez M, Matas-Diez JA, Vaquero-Martín J BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2015)
    55. [55]
      Increase in the tibial slope reduces wear after medial unicompartmental fixed-bearing arthroplasty of the knee. — Weber P, Schröder C, Schwiesau J, Utzschneider S, Steinbrück A, Pietschmann MF et al. BioMed research international (2015)
    56. [56]
      Low-grade periprosthetic knee infection: diagnosis and management. — Vasso M, Schiavone Panni A Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (2015)
    57. [57]
      Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals. — Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Furnes O Acta orthopaedica (2014)
    58. [58]
      The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice. — Schroer WC, Barnes CL, Diesfeld P, LeMarr A, Ingrassia R, Morton DJ et al. Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    59. [59]
      Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties. — Saragaglia D, Bonnin M, Dejour D, Deschamps G, Chol C, Chabert B et al. International orthopaedics (2013)
    60. [60]
      Is there a role for knee arthrodesis with modular endoprostheses for tumor and revision of failed endoprostheses? — Angelini A, Henderson E, Trovarelli G, Ruggieri P Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    61. [61]
      Better quality of life after medial versus lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty. — Liebs TR, Herzberg W Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    62. [62]
      A novel knee prosthesis model of implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. — Søe NH, Jensen NV, Nürnberg BM, Jensen AL, Koch J, Poulsen SS et al. Acta orthopaedica (2013)
    63. [63]
      Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension. — Biswas D, Haughom B, Mayle RE, Della Valle CJ Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    64. [64]
      Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III-what can we expect? — Pietschmann MF, Wohlleb L, Weber P, Schmidutz F, Ficklscherer A, Gülecyüz MF et al. International orthopaedics (2013)
    65. [65]
      Single-step test for unilateral limb ability following total knee arthroplasty. — Marmon AR, McClelland JA, Stevens-Lapsley J, Snyder-Mackler L The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy (2013)
    66. [66]
      Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses. — Choi WC, Ryu KJ, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    67. [67]
      Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee? — Bruni D, Iacono F, Raspugli G, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2012)
    68. [68]
      New MR imaging methods for metallic implants in the knee: artifact correction and clinical impact. — Chen CA, Chen W, Goodman SB, Hargreaves BA, Koch KM, Lu W et al. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI (2011)
    69. [69]
      Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. — Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stöckl B Acta orthopaedica (2011)
    70. [70]
      Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control. — Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2011)
    71. [71]
      Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. — Tsuji S, Tomita T, Hashimoto H, Fujii M, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K International orthopaedics (2011)
    72. [72]
      Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. — John J, Mauffrey C, May P International orthopaedics (2011)
    73. [73]
      A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding. — Meijerink HJ, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Kampen A, Verdonschot N Acta orthopaedica (2010)
    74. [74]
      Routine surveillance of modular PFC TKA shows increasing failures after 10 years. — Malin AS, Callaghan JJ, Bozic KJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Sullivan N et al. Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2010)
    75. [75]
      Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. — Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN Acta orthopaedica (2010)
    76. [76]
      Can a Matched Case-Control Methodology Efficiently Estimate Functional Relationships Between Knee Implant Alignment and Revision Risk? A Simulation-Based Analysis. — Hickey MD, Anglin C, Masri BA, Hodgson AJ The Journal of arthroplasty (2026)
    77. [77]
      A Greater Rate of Return to High-Impact Sports Favoring Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. — Vossen RJM, Ten Noever de Brauw GV, van der List JP, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Pearle AD, Zuiderbaan HA The journal of knee surgery (2026)
    78. [78]
      Simulated Wear and Fatigue Performance of Cobalt-Chrome-Molybdenum and Co-Cr-Free Nitrided Titanium Femoral Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. — Ramos MS, Mimnaugh KD, Khan ST, Orozco-Villasenor DA, Schultz M, Piuzzi NS The journal of knee surgery (2026)
    79. [79]
      Extensor mechanism injury/failure following spacer dislocation in periprosthetic joint infection: a case series in a single reference center. — Mei A, Scazzarriello M, Brioschi D, Larghi M, Manzotti A Musculoskeletal surgery (2026)
    80. [80]
      Long-term clinical and MRI outcomes of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation for the treatment of partial meniscal deficiency: A minimum 10-year follow-up study. — Akrivos VS, Komnos GA, Ujvari B, Hante A, Adaktylidou E, Karachalios T et al. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2026)
    81. [81]
      3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instruments-Combined AI Virtual Preoperative Planning-Assisted Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. — Liu S, Yang S, Liu G Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE (2025)
    82. [82]
      Migration of Cemented and Uncemented Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty with an Asymmetrical Tibial Component: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a 2-Year Model-Based Radiostereometric Analysis Follow-up. — Altun MY, Flivik G, Lind T, Odgaard A, Holm CE, Petersen MM The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (2025)
    83. [83]
      Eligibility for One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Predicts Survivorship: A Retrospective Analysis of 509 Cases. — Elmenawi KA, Mallinger BD, Poilvache H, Hannon CP, Abdel MP, Bedard NA The Journal of arthroplasty (2025)
    84. [84]
      Medial and lateral knee contact forces and muscle forces during sit-to-stand in patients one year after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. — Kowalski E, Pelegrinelli ARM, Catelli DS, Dervin G, Lamontagne M Medical engineering & physics (2024)
    85. [85]
      Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature. — Hiranaka T Expert review of medical devices (2024)
    86. [86]
      Results of a monocentric field study: value of histology compared to sonication method and conventional tissue culture in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). — Röhrl A, Klawonn F, Füchtmeier B, Wulbrand C, Gessner A, Zustin J et al. Infection (2024)
    87. [87]
      Pre-milling technique improves the accuracy of posterior femoral condyle cut and reduces the tibial recut in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. — Hiranaka T, Fukai Y, Tanaka S, Okajima T, Kanno T, Koide M et al. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2024)
    88. [88]
      Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection. — Liechti EF, Linke P, Gehrke T, Citak M, Lausmann C International orthopaedics (2024)
    89. [89]
      Ninety-day postoperative mortality and complications in continuous and unselected single-stage revisions for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. — Yang C, Ji B, Li G, Zhang X, Xu B, Cao L International orthopaedics (2024)
    90. [90]
      Development of novel hybrid 3D-printed degradable artificial joints incorporating electrospun pharmaceutical- and growth factor-loaded nanofibers for small joint reconstruction. — Hsu YH, Chou YC, Chen CL, Yu YH, Lu CJ, Liu SJ Biomaterials advances (2024)
    91. [91]
      Variations in Trochlear Morphology of Contemporary and Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses: A Review of 22 Designs. — Gattu N, Sutton M, Doherty DB, Lanfermeijer ND, Rodriguez-Quintana D, Ismaily SK et al. The Journal of arthroplasty (2024)
    92. [92]
      How to remove a well-fixed metaphyseal sleeve in revision knee arthroplasty: A step-by-step surgical procedure. — Sanz-Ruiz P, Matas-Diez JA, Villanueva-Martínez M, Fernández-Fernández T, Prats-Peinado L, Vaquero J The Knee (2024)
    93. [93]
      Di-cumyl peroxide cross-linked UHMWPE/vitamin-E blend for total joint arthroplasty implants. — Muratoglu OK, Asik MD, Nepple CM, Wannomae KK, Micheli BR, Connolly RL et al. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society (2024)
    94. [94]
      Fifteen-year survival analysis of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty. — Fennelly JT, Papalexandris S, Pope J, Yorke J, Davidson JS, Santini AJ The Knee (2023)
    95. [95]
      Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Fresh-Frozen Allografts Using the Bridge-in-Slot Technique. — Wagner KR, Kaiser JT, Hevesi M, Cotter EJ, Gilat R, Meeker ZD et al. The American journal of sports medicine (2023)
    96. [96]
      Exposure to Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence-Based Manifestations: A Primer on the Future of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. — Shaikh HJF, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Lavoie-Gagne O, Long WJ, Ramkumar PN The Journal of arthroplasty (2023)
    97. [97]
      Polyethylene wear simulation models applied to a prosthetic hip joint based on unidirectional articulations. — Dalli D, Fanton L, Mallia B, Wismayer PS, Buhagiar J, Mollicone P Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials (2023)
    98. [98]
      Functional scores and prosthetic implant placement are different for navigated medial UKA left in varus alignment. — Douiri A, Bouguennec N, Biset A, Colombet P, Laboudie P, Graveleau N Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2023)
    99. [99]
      Artificial Intelligence for Automated Implant Identification in Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter External Validation Study Exceeding 3.5 Million Plain Radiographs. — Karnuta JM, Shaikh HJF, Murphy MP, Brown NM, Pearle AD, Nawabi DH et al. The Journal of arthroplasty (2023)
    100. [100]
      Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes in One versus Two Component Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty. — Howard LC, Day CW, Masri BA, Garbuz DS The Journal of arthroplasty (2023)

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG