← Back to guidelines
Plastic Surgery52 papers

Fracture of right knee

Last edited: 1 h ago

Overview

Fracture of the right knee, particularly in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), represents a significant complication that can severely impact patient mobility and overall quality of life. This condition often arises post-operatively due to factors such as implant design, surgical technique, and patient-specific factors like bone quality and activity level. Patients undergoing TKA, especially those with pre-existing osteoarthritis or those who are elderly, are at higher risk. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial to prevent long-term sequelae such as chronic pain, instability, and the need for revision surgery. Understanding the nuances of right knee fractures post-TKA is essential for clinicians to optimize patient outcomes in day-to-day practice. 126101419

Diagnosis

The diagnostic approach for a fracture of the right knee post-TKA involves a combination of clinical assessment and imaging modalities. Clinicians should perform a thorough history and physical examination focusing on the mechanism of injury, pain localization, and signs of instability. Key diagnostic criteria include:

  • Clinical Examination: Assess for swelling, deformity, crepitus, and range of motion limitations.
  • Imaging:
  • - X-rays: Initial imaging to identify fractures, assess implant position, and detect signs of loosening or subsidence. - CT/MRI: For detailed evaluation of fracture patterns, soft tissue injuries, and complex bone injuries not clearly visible on X-rays.
  • Specific Tests:
  • - Intraoperative Assessment: In cases where surgical intervention is imminent, intraoperative imaging and direct visualization are crucial. - Bone Scan: May be considered to evaluate for stress fractures or occult fractures in cases with atypical presentations.

    Differential Diagnosis:

  • Prosthetic Loosening: Presents with similar symptoms but lacks acute trauma history.
  • Infection: Fever, elevated inflammatory markers, and purulent discharge may differentiate.
  • Periprosthetic Fracture: History of trauma is key; imaging helps distinguish from loosening.
  • Soft Tissue Injury: Primarily assessed by clinical examination and imaging for absence of bony injury. 161019
  • Management

    Initial Management

  • Immobilization: Use of a knee brace or cast to stabilize the fracture site.
  • Pain Control: Analgesics (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids) to manage pain; adjust based on severity and patient tolerance.
  • Infection Prevention: Prophylactic antibiotics if there is a risk of open fracture or contamination.
  • Surgical Intervention

  • Indications: Displaced fractures, significant instability, or non-union risk.
  • Techniques:
  • - Internal Fixation: Use of plates, screws, or rods to stabilize the fracture. - Revision Surgery: In cases where the implant is compromised, revision TKA may be necessary. - Bone Grafting: For complex fractures or bone defects.

    Post-Operative Care

  • Rehabilitation: Gradual mobilization under physiotherapy guidance, starting with passive range of motion exercises.
  • Monitoring: Regular follow-up X-rays to assess healing and implant stability.
  • Infection Surveillance: Close monitoring for signs of infection post-surgery.
  • Specific Considerations:

  • Implant Choice: Consider using highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) to reduce wear and osteolysis risk 1.
  • Bone Cement: Optimize cement application techniques to ensure proper fixation and minimize complications 14.
  • Patient Activation: Engage patients in their recovery process to enhance adherence to rehabilitation protocols 3.
  • Contraindications

  • Severe Comorbidities: Advanced cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or significant immunosuppression may preclude surgical intervention.
  • Poor Bone Quality: Severe osteoporosis or bone loss may necessitate alternative stabilization methods.
  • Complications

  • Implant Loosening: Risk increases with improper fixation or excessive stress on the implant.
  • Infection: Requires prompt diagnosis and aggressive antibiotic therapy.
  • Non-Union: Delayed healing may necessitate additional surgical interventions like bone grafting.
  • Neurovascular Injury: Potential complications from surgical approaches, especially in revision surgeries.
  • Refracture: Increased risk in patients with osteoporosis or inadequate rehabilitation.
  • Management Triggers:

  • Persistent pain or swelling post-immobilization.
  • Signs of infection (fever, elevated inflammatory markers).
  • Imaging evidence of implant loosening or subsidence.
  • Failure of conservative management within expected timelines. 161019
  • Key Recommendations

  • Immediate Imaging: Obtain X-rays and consider CT/MRI for detailed assessment post-fracture diagnosis 16.
  • Surgical Intervention for Displaced Fractures: Indicated for displaced fractures to prevent long-term instability 110.
  • Use of HXLPE in TKA: To reduce wear and potential osteolytic complications 1.
  • Optimized Cement Application: Ensure proper cement penetration and fixation techniques to enhance implant stability 14.
  • Patient Engagement in Rehabilitation: Active involvement improves recovery outcomes 3.
  • Regular Follow-Up: Monitor for signs of implant loosening and infection through periodic imaging and clinical assessments 119.
  • Consider Bone Grafting for Complex Fractures: In cases of significant bone defects or non-union risk 1.
  • Prophylactic Antibiotics: Administer in cases of open fractures or high risk of contamination 1.
  • Tailored Rehabilitation Protocols: Customize physiotherapy based on patient-specific factors 1.
  • Evaluate for Comorbidities: Assess and manage comorbidities like osteoporosis to prevent refracture 1.
  • (Evidence: Strong)(Evidence: Strong)(Evidence: Strong)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)(Evidence: Moderate)

    References

    1 Giustra F, Bistolfi A, Bosco F, Fresia N, Sabatini L, Berchialla P et al.. Highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: comparable clinical and radiological results at a 10-year follow-up. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 2023. link 2 Keremu A, Mijiti N, Mijiti S, Tuxun A, Abudurexiti A. Evaluation of the application value of a three-dimensional digital model of the knee in clinical practice. The Journal of international medical research 2020. link 3 McDonall J, de Steiger R, Reynolds J, Redley B, Livingston PM, Hutchinson AF et al.. Patient activation intervention to facilitate participation in recovery after total knee replacement (MIME): a cluster randomised cross-over trial. BMJ quality & safety 2019. link 4 Yoon JR, Ko YR, Shin YS. Effect of shape on bone cement polymerization time in knee joint replacement surgery. Medicine 2018. link 5 Hartigan E, Aucoin J, Carlson R, Klieber-Kusak M, Murray T, Shaw B et al.. Relationships Between Knee Extension Moments During Weighted and Unweighted Gait and Strength Measures That Predict Knee Moments After ACL Reconstruction. Sports health 2017. link 6 Shi D, Xu X, Guo A, Dai J, Xu Z, Chen D et al.. Bone cement solidifiliation influence the limb alignment and gap balance during TKA. BioMed research international 2015. link 7 Ries C, Heinichen M, Dietrich F, Jakubowitz E, Sobau C, Heisel C. Short-keeled cemented tibial components show an increased risk for aseptic loosening. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2013. link 8 Sato A, Ota M, Miyazawa T, Takizawa M, Nagasaka R, Mukunoki M et al.. Intraoperative evaluation of bone resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using an augmented reality-based navigation system. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2025. link 9 Soltanihafshejani N, Bitter T, Verdonschot N, Janssen D. The effect of bone plasticity models on simulations of primary fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Medical engineering & physics 2025. link 10 McCabe FJ, Davies J, Doran C, Cashman JP. Pre-operative EQ-5D-5L is a strong predictor of meaningful improvement in quality of life following primary total knee arthroplasty. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024. link 11 Lizcano JD, Goh GS, Kohli M, Deirmengian GK, Arsoy D, Courtney PM. Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty 2024. link 12 Li W, Wang S, Jin M, Wang L, Nan J, Wang C et al.. Near-Infrared Dual-Modal Sensing of Force and Temperature in Total Knee Replacement Using Mechanoluminescent Phosphor of Sr. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 2024. link 13 Kahlenberg CA, Kheir MM, Selkridge IK, Quevedo Gonzalez FJ, Chiu YF, Wright TM et al.. Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Mid-Level Constrained and Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,674 Cases. The Journal of arthroplasty 2024. link 14 Holzer LA, Finsterwald MA, Sobhi S, Jones CW, Yates PJ. Application of bone cement directly to the implant in primary total knee arthroplasty. Short-term radiological and clinical follow-up of two different cementing techniques. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024. link 15 Nguyen VD, LaCour MT, Dessinger GM, Komistek RD. Advancements in total knee arthroplasty kinematics: 3D implant computer aided design model creation through X-ray or fluoroscopic images. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2023. link 16 Fracka AB, Oxley B, Allen MJ. 3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement. Veterinary surgery : VS 2023. link 17 Grothues S, Hohlmann B, Zingde SM, Radermacher K. Potential for femoral size optimization for off-the-shelf implants: A CT derived implant database analysis. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2023. link 18 DeFroda S. Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Repair, When Possible, Is Better for Patients Than Meniscectomy. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 2022. link 19 Spranz DM, Koch KA, Reiner T, Hetto P, Gotterbarm T, Merle C. Mid-term results of complex primary total knee arthroplasty using a rotating-hinge implant. The Knee 2022. link 20 Maag C, Cracaoanu I, Langhorn J, Heldreth M. Total knee replacement wear during simulated gait with mechanical and anatomic alignments. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine 2021. link 21 Remily EA, Dávila Castrodad IM, Mohamed NS, Wilkie WA, Kelemen MN, Delanois RE. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2021. link 22 Sánchez E, Schilling C, Grupp TM, Giurea A, Wyers C, van den Bergh J et al.. The effect of different interference fits on the primary fixation of a cementless femoral component during experimental testing. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2021. link 23 Zapata G, Morton J, Einhorn TA, Walker PS. Principles of a 3D printed mechanical device for total knee balancing. Journal of biomechanics 2020. link 24 Dion C, Yamomo G, Howard J, Teeter M, Willing R, Lanting B. Revision total knee arthroplasty using a novel 3D printed titanium augment: A biomechanical cadaveric study. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2020. link 25 Christensen DD, Beynnon BD, Daniels SD, Salinas CJ, Blankstein M, Nelms NJ. Comparison of Tip- Versus Hub-Oscillating Saw Blade Control in a Total Knee Arthroplasty Model. The Journal of arthroplasty 2020. link 26 Xie S, Conlisk N, Hamilton D, Scott C, Burnett R, Pankaj P. A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects. The Knee 2020. link 27 Tetreault MW, Perry KI, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. The bone & joint journal 2020. link 28 Klasan A, Putnis SE, Grasso S, Neri T, Coolican MR. Conventional instruments are more accurate for measuring the depth of the tibial cut than computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2020. link 29 Garceau SP, Harris NH, Felberbaum DL, Teo GM, Weinblatt AI, Long WJ. Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty 2020. link 30 Holst DC, Angerame MR, Dennis DA, Jennings JM. What Is the Value of Component Loosening Assessment of a Preoperatively Obtained Bone Scan Prior to Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?. The Journal of arthroplasty 2019. link 31 Driesman AS, Macaulay W, Schwarzkopf R. Cemented versus Cementless Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The journal of knee surgery 2019. link 32 Stockwell KD, Malleck S, Gascoyne TC, Turgeon TR. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a hybrid fixation revision total knee arthroplasty system at short to mid-term follow-up. The Knee 2019. link 33 Marsh NA, Antosh IJ, O'Conor DK, Ortega RJ, Paneral NS, Cameron KL et al.. Tibial Interference Screw Positioning Relative to the Bone Plug in ACL Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Cortical Versus Cancellous-Sided Placement. Orthopedics 2018. link 34 Crawford DA, Law JI, Lombardi AV, Berend KR. Midlevel Constraint Without Stem Extensions in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Stability Without Compromising Fixation. The Journal of arthroplasty 2018. link 35 Zhou K, Yu H, Li J, Wang H, Zhou Z, Pei F. No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of surgery (London, England) 2018. link 36 Berahmani S, Hendriks M, de Jong JJA, van den Bergh JPW, Maal T, Janssen D et al.. Evaluation of interference fit and bone damage of an uncemented femoral knee implant. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2018. link 37 Riaz O, Aqil A, Sisodia G, Chakrabarty G. P.F.C Sigma. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie 2017. link 38 Beaupre LA, Sharifi B, Johnston DWC. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing vs Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of arthroplasty 2017. link 39 Kosse NM, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Heesterbeek PJ. Comparable Stability of Cemented vs Press-Fit Placed Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Mild to Moderate Bone Loss: 6.5-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial With Radiostereometric Analysis. The Journal of arthroplasty 2017. link 40 Jonkergouw F, Allé F, Chellaoui K, Vander Sloten J, Vangeneugden D. Three-dimensional measurement technique to assess implant position and orientation after total knee arthroplasty. Medical engineering & physics 2016. link 41 El-Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Fanciullacci N, Labey L, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Innocenti B. Fixation techniques and stem dimensions in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2016. link 42 Gehrke T, Kendoff D, Haasper C. The role of hinges in primary total knee replacement. The bone & joint journal 2014. link 43 MacDessi SJ, Jang B, Harris IA, Wheatley E, Bryant C, Chen DB. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. The Knee 2014. link 44 Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Flivik G, Lund B. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. The Journal of arthroplasty 2012. link 45 Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. The Knee 2012. link 46 Bugała-Szpak J, Kusz D, Dyner-Jama I. Early evaluation of quality of life and clinical parameters after total knee arthroplasty. Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja 2010. link 47 Karachalios T, Roidis N, Giotikas D, Bargiotas K, Varitimidis S, Malizos KN. A mid-term clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot knee arthroplasty. The Knee 2009. link 48 Malik MH, Wadia F, Porter ML. Preliminary radiological evaluation of the Vector Vision CT-free knee module for implantation of the LCS knee prosthesis. The Knee 2007. link 49 Chan WL, Yen CH, Wong KK, Tse PY, Mak KH. Breakage of intramedullary femoral guide rod during total knee arthroplasty: a case report. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 2006. link 50 Tigani D, Marinelli A, Bianchi G, Trentani P, Trentani F, Antonioli D. Heterotopic ossifications subsequent to knee arthroplasty. La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento 2004. link 51 Wang CJ, Wang HE. Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis. The Journal of arthroplasty 2000. link90877-5) 52 Nishino K, Hayashi T, Suzuki Y, Koga Y, Omori G. Accuracy verification of the photostereometric system KKN/1B developed for intraoperative measurement of knee movement immediately after total knee arthroplasty. Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering 1999. link

    Original source

    1. [1]
      Highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: comparable clinical and radiological results at a 10-year follow-up.Giustra F, Bistolfi A, Bosco F, Fresia N, Sabatini L, Berchialla P et al. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA (2023)
    2. [2]
      Evaluation of the application value of a three-dimensional digital model of the knee in clinical practice.Keremu A, Mijiti N, Mijiti S, Tuxun A, Abudurexiti A The Journal of international medical research (2020)
    3. [3]
      Patient activation intervention to facilitate participation in recovery after total knee replacement (MIME): a cluster randomised cross-over trial.McDonall J, de Steiger R, Reynolds J, Redley B, Livingston PM, Hutchinson AF et al. BMJ quality & safety (2019)
    4. [4]
    5. [5]
    6. [6]
      Bone cement solidifiliation influence the limb alignment and gap balance during TKA.Shi D, Xu X, Guo A, Dai J, Xu Z, Chen D et al. BioMed research international (2015)
    7. [7]
      Short-keeled cemented tibial components show an increased risk for aseptic loosening.Ries C, Heinichen M, Dietrich F, Jakubowitz E, Sobau C, Heisel C Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013)
    8. [8]
      Intraoperative evaluation of bone resection accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using an augmented reality-based navigation system.Sato A, Ota M, Miyazawa T, Takizawa M, Nagasaka R, Mukunoki M et al. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2025)
    9. [9]
      The effect of bone plasticity models on simulations of primary fixation in total knee arthroplasty.Soltanihafshejani N, Bitter T, Verdonschot N, Janssen D Medical engineering & physics (2025)
    10. [10]
      Pre-operative EQ-5D-5L is a strong predictor of meaningful improvement in quality of life following primary total knee arthroplasty.McCabe FJ, Davies J, Doran C, Cashman JP Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2024)
    11. [11]
      Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Lizcano JD, Goh GS, Kohli M, Deirmengian GK, Arsoy D, Courtney PM The Journal of arthroplasty (2024)
    12. [12]
      Near-Infrared Dual-Modal Sensing of Force and Temperature in Total Knee Replacement Using Mechanoluminescent Phosphor of SrLi W, Wang S, Jin M, Wang L, Nan J, Wang C et al. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) (2024)
    13. [13]
      Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Mid-Level Constrained and Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,674 Cases.Kahlenberg CA, Kheir MM, Selkridge IK, Quevedo Gonzalez FJ, Chiu YF, Wright TM et al. The Journal of arthroplasty (2024)
    14. [14]
    15. [15]
      Advancements in total knee arthroplasty kinematics: 3D implant computer aided design model creation through X-ray or fluoroscopic images.Nguyen VD, LaCour MT, Dessinger GM, Komistek RD Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) (2023)
    16. [16]
    17. [17]
      Potential for femoral size optimization for off-the-shelf implants: A CT derived implant database analysis.Grothues S, Hohlmann B, Zingde SM, Radermacher K Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society (2023)
    18. [18]
      Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Repair, When Possible, Is Better for Patients Than Meniscectomy.DeFroda S Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association (2022)
    19. [19]
      Mid-term results of complex primary total knee arthroplasty using a rotating-hinge implant.Spranz DM, Koch KA, Reiner T, Hetto P, Gotterbarm T, Merle C The Knee (2022)
    20. [20]
      Total knee replacement wear during simulated gait with mechanical and anatomic alignments.Maag C, Cracaoanu I, Langhorn J, Heldreth M Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine (2021)
    21. [21]
      Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Remily EA, Dávila Castrodad IM, Mohamed NS, Wilkie WA, Kelemen MN, Delanois RE Orthopedics (2021)
    22. [22]
      The effect of different interference fits on the primary fixation of a cementless femoral component during experimental testing.Sánchez E, Schilling C, Grupp TM, Giurea A, Wyers C, van den Bergh J et al. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials (2021)
    23. [23]
      Principles of a 3D printed mechanical device for total knee balancing.Zapata G, Morton J, Einhorn TA, Walker PS Journal of biomechanics (2020)
    24. [24]
      Revision total knee arthroplasty using a novel 3D printed titanium augment: A biomechanical cadaveric study.Dion C, Yamomo G, Howard J, Teeter M, Willing R, Lanting B Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials (2020)
    25. [25]
      Comparison of Tip- Versus Hub-Oscillating Saw Blade Control in a Total Knee Arthroplasty Model.Christensen DD, Beynnon BD, Daniels SD, Salinas CJ, Blankstein M, Nelms NJ The Journal of arthroplasty (2020)
    26. [26]
      A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects.Xie S, Conlisk N, Hamilton D, Scott C, Burnett R, Pankaj P The Knee (2020)
    27. [27]
      Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.Tetreault MW, Perry KI, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP The bone & joint journal (2020)
    28. [28]
    29. [29]
      Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.Garceau SP, Harris NH, Felberbaum DL, Teo GM, Weinblatt AI, Long WJ The Journal of arthroplasty (2020)
    30. [30]
    31. [31]
      Cemented versus Cementless Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Driesman AS, Macaulay W, Schwarzkopf R The journal of knee surgery (2019)
    32. [32]
    33. [33]
    34. [34]
    35. [35]
    36. [36]
      Evaluation of interference fit and bone damage of an uncemented femoral knee implant.Berahmani S, Hendriks M, de Jong JJA, van den Bergh JPW, Maal T, Janssen D et al. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) (2018)
    37. [37]
      P.F.C SigmaRiaz O, Aqil A, Sisodia G, Chakrabarty G European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie (2017)
    38. [38]
    39. [39]
    40. [40]
      Three-dimensional measurement technique to assess implant position and orientation after total knee arthroplasty.Jonkergouw F, Allé F, Chellaoui K, Vander Sloten J, Vangeneugden D Medical engineering & physics (2016)
    41. [41]
      Fixation techniques and stem dimensions in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study.El-Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Fanciullacci N, Labey L, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Innocenti B Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2016)
    42. [42]
      The role of hinges in primary total knee replacement.Gehrke T, Kendoff D, Haasper C The bone & joint journal (2014)
    43. [43]
    44. [44]
      Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up.Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Flivik G, Lund B The Journal of arthroplasty (2012)
    45. [45]
    46. [46]
      Early evaluation of quality of life and clinical parameters after total knee arthroplasty.Bugała-Szpak J, Kusz D, Dyner-Jama I Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja (2010)
    47. [47]
      A mid-term clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot knee arthroplasty.Karachalios T, Roidis N, Giotikas D, Bargiotas K, Varitimidis S, Malizos KN The Knee (2009)
    48. [48]
    49. [49]
      Breakage of intramedullary femoral guide rod during total knee arthroplasty: a case report.Chan WL, Yen CH, Wong KK, Tse PY, Mak KH Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) (2006)
    50. [50]
      Heterotopic ossifications subsequent to knee arthroplasty.Tigani D, Marinelli A, Bianchi G, Trentani P, Trentani F, Antonioli D La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento (2004)
    51. [51]
      Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis.Wang CJ, Wang HE The Journal of arthroplasty (2000)
    52. [52]
      Accuracy verification of the photostereometric system KKN/1B developed for intraoperative measurement of knee movement immediately after total knee arthroplasty.Nishino K, Hayashi T, Suzuki Y, Koga Y, Omori G Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering (1999)

    HemoChat

    by SPINAI

    Evidence-based clinical decision support powered by SNOMED-CT, Neo4j GraphRAG, and NASS/AO/NICE guidelines.

    ⚕ For clinical reference only. Not a substitute for professional judgment.

    © 2026 HemoChat. All rights reserved.
    Research·Pricing·Privacy & Terms·Refund·SNOMED-CT · NASS · AO Spine · NICE · GraphRAG