Overview
Axis III diagnosis typically refers to the assessment of psychosocial and environmental factors impacting a patient's health status, often utilized in psychiatric and rehabilitation settings to provide a comprehensive evaluation beyond Axis I (clinical disorders) and Axis II (personality disorders).Diagnosis
Management
Special Populations
Key Recommendations
References
1 Duan M, Kong QZ, Zuo XL, Yang XY, Li YY. Optimizing . World journal of gastroenterology 2026. link 2 Johnsson V, Petersen OB, Svendsen MBS, Kulasegaram K, Nørgaard LN, Harmsen L et al.. To guide or not to guide: A randomized study on the use of needle guide for chorionic villus sampling training. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2026. link 3 Bayçelebi D, Karakök E, Balcı S, Aktepe F, Doğusoy GB, Elbeği İÇ et al.. Implementation of Digital Pathology Workflow for Routine Primary Diagnosis in a Large Private Hospital Network. APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica 2026. link 4 Croskerry P, Clancy M. Diagnosis through prisms: Unraveling its complexity. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2025. link 5 Pelaccia T, Sherbino J, Wyer P, Norman G. Diagnostic reasoning and cognitive error in emergency medicine: Implications for teaching and learning. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2025. link 6 Ahmed F, Yang L, Jaroensri T, Sellergren A, Matias Y, Hassidim A et al.. PolyPath: Adapting a Large Multimodal Model for Multislide Pathology Report Generation. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 2025. link 7 Evans H, Kimani PK, Hiller L, Tsang YW, Sah S, Gopalakrishnan K et al.. What factors influence cellular pathologists' confidence in case reporting?. Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2025. link 8 Snead DR, Azam AS, Thirlwall J, Kimani P, Hiller L, Bickers A et al.. Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) 2025. link 9 Hsu YR, Ahmed I, Phlamon J, Carment-Baker C, Chan JYT, Prassas I et al.. An adapted & improved validation protocol for digital pathology implementation. Seminars in diagnostic pathology 2025. link 10 Abulí A, Antolín E, Borrell A, Garcia-Hoyos M, García Santiago F, Gómez Manjón I et al.. Guidelines for NGS procedures applied to prenatal diagnosis by the Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Spanish Association of Prenatal Diagnosis. Journal of medical genetics 2024. link 11 Sherbino J, Sibbald M, Norman G, LoGiudice A, Keuhl A, Lee M et al.. Crowdsourcing a diagnosis? Exploring the accuracy of the size and type of group diagnosis: an experimental study. BMJ quality & safety 2024. link 12 Moutos CP, Phelps JY. Wrongful birth and wrongful life lawsuits in obstetrics and gynecology. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2024. link 13 Caputo A, Pisapia P, L'Imperio V. Current role of cytopathology in the molecular and computational era: The perspective of young pathologists. Cancer cytopathology 2024. link 14 Apornvirat S, Thinpanja W, Damrongkiet K, Benjakul N, Laohawetwanit T. Comparing customized ChatGPT and pathology residents in histopathologic description and diagnosis of common diseases. Annals of diagnostic pathology 2024. link 15 Vivanti AJ, Benachi A, Saada J, Bonnin A, Letourneau A, Carrara J et al.. Impact of simulation-based prenatal invasive procedure training on professional practice, a preliminary study. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction 2021. link 16 Azam AS, Miligy IM, Kimani PK, Maqbool H, Hewitt K, Rajpoot NM et al.. Diagnostic concordance and discordance in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical pathology 2021. link 17 Hui L, Szepe E, Halliday J, Lewis C. Maternity health care professionals' views and experiences of fetal genomic uncertainty: A review. Prenatal diagnosis 2020. link 18 Vanstone M, Monteiro S, Colvin E, Norman G, Sherbino J, Sibbald M et al.. Experienced physician descriptions of intuition in clinical reasoning: a typology. Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) 2019. link 19 Bösner S, Abushi J, Feufel M, Donner-Banzhoff N. Diagnostic strategies in general practice and the emergency department: a comparative qualitative analysis. BMJ open 2019. link 20 Katsogiannou M, Donato XC, Loundou A, Glowaczower E, Raffray M, Planchet-Barraud B et al.. Managing pain and anxiety during transabdominal chorionic villus sampling. A noninferiority randomized trial of nitrous oxide vs local anesthesia. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2019. link 21 Lemoine N, Dajer A, Konwinski J, Cavanaugh D, Besthoff C, Singh H. Understanding diagnostic safety in emergency medicine: A case-by-case review of closed ED malpractice claims. Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management 2018. link 22 Crausman RS, Wright CN. The Physical Finding Points to the Diagnosis. Rhode Island medical journal (2013) 2017. link 23 Schriger DL, Elder JW, Cooper RJ. Structured Clinical Decision Aids Are Seldom Compared With Subjective Physician Judgment, and Are Seldom Superior. Annals of emergency medicine 2017. link 24 Cheng HYH, Kan AS, Hui PW, Lee CP, Tang MHY. Bridging the gap from prenatal karyotyping to whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization in Hong Kong: survey on knowledge and acceptance of health-care providers and pregnant women. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2017. link 25 Cheng CL, Tan PH. Digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: beyond technology into best practice and service management. Journal of clinical pathology 2017. link 26 Liu PY, Chin LK, Ser W, Chen HF, Hsieh CM, Lee CH et al.. Cell refractive index for cell biology and disease diagnosis: past, present and future. Lab on a chip 2016. link 27 . Committee Opinion No. 682 Summary: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstetrics and gynecology 2016. link 28 . Committee Opinion No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstetrics and gynecology 2016. link 29 Cordier AG, Fuchs F, Tassin M, Saada J, Letourneau A, Brisset S et al.. Teaching invasive prenatal procedures: effectiveness of two simple simulators in training. Prenatal diagnosis 2016. link 30 Zhai J, Cai W, Li C, Chen M, Huang L, Zhong M. Survey of attitudes of Chinese perinatologists and obstetricians toward non-invasive prenatal genetic testing. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2016. link 31 Snead DR, Tsang YW, Meskiri A, Kimani PK, Crossman R, Rajpoot NM et al.. Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology 2016. link 32 Marsch AF, Truong JN, McPherson MM, Junkins-Hopkins JM, Elston DM. A Dermatopathologist's Guide to Troubleshooting Immunohistochemistry--Part 2: Troubleshooting Immunohistochemical Tests in the Laboratory. The American Journal of dermatopathology 2015. link 33 Hui L, The S, McCarthy EA, Walker SP. Emerging issues in invasive prenatal diagnosis: Safety and competency in the post-NIPT era. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2015. link 34 Rose NC, Eller AG. The impact of noninvasive fetal evaluation: its effect on education, training, and the maintenance of clinical competence in prenatal diagnosis. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2014. link 35 Genta RM. Same specimen, different diagnoses: suprahistologic elements in observer variability. Advances in anatomic pathology 2014. link 36 Rose NC, Lagrave D, Hafen B, Jackson M. The impact of utilization of early aneuploidy screening on amniocenteses available for training in obstetrics and fetal medicine. Prenatal diagnosis 2013. link 37 Bartels PH, Bartels HG. Classification in karyometry: performance testing and prediction error. Analytical and quantitative cytopathology and histopathology 2013. link 38 Ilgen JS, Humbert AJ, Kuhn G, Hansen ML, Norman GR, Eva KW et al.. Assessing diagnostic reasoning: a consensus statement summarizing theory, practice, and future needs. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2012. link 39 Shahid M, Hameed K, Iqbal R, Afzal O, Nakeer R, Razzak J. Accuracy of diagnosis and relationship with quality of emergency medicine training program. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP 2012. link 40 Yotsumoto J, Sekizawa A, Koide K, Purwosunu Y, Ichizuka K, Matsuoka R et al.. Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan. Prenatal diagnosis 2012. link 41 Fónyad L, Krenács T, Nagy P, Zalatnai A, Csomor J, Sápi Z et al.. Validation of diagnostic accuracy using digital slides in routine histopathology. Diagnostic pathology 2012. link 42 Sayres LC, Allyse M, Norton ME, Cho MK. Cell-free fetal DNA testing: a pilot study of obstetric healthcare provider attitudes toward clinical implementation. Prenatal diagnosis 2011. link 43 Boyd GW. Education debate: clinical diagnostic reasoning. Internal medicine journal 2011. link 44 Fabbretti G. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology. Pathologica 2011. link 45 Nizard J. Amniocentesis: technique and education. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2010. link 46 Fruhman G, Van den Veyver IB. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 2010. link 47 Blumenfeld YJ, Chueh J. Chorionic villus sampling: technique and training. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2010. link 48 Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Diagnostic methods 2: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kidney international 2009. link 49 Boormans EM, Birnie E, Bilardo CM, Oepkes D, Bonsel GJ, van Lith JM. Karyotyping or rapid aneuploidy detection in prenatal diagnosis? The different views of users and providers of prenatal care. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009. link 50 Avent ND, Madgett TE, Maddocks DG, Soothill PW. Cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal serum and plasma: current and evolving applications. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2009. link 51 Khurshid A, Ahmad Z, Qureshi A. In-house daily consensus conference: an important quality control/quality assurance activity--experience at a major referral center. Indian journal of pathology & microbiology 2009. link 52 Sparbier K, Wenzel T, Dihazi H, Blaschke S, Müller GA, Deelder A et al.. Immuno-MALDI-TOF MS: new perspectives for clinical applications of mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2009. link 53 Chaerkady R, Pandey A. Applications of proteomics to lab diagnosis. Annual review of pathology 2008. link 54 Purwosunu Y, Sekizawa A, Koide K, Okazaki S, Farina A, Okai T. Clinical potential for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis through detection of fetal cells in maternal blood. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2006. link60184-4) 55 Smith RP, Lombaard H, Soothill PW. The obstetrician's view: ethical and societal implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal diagnosis 2006. link 56 Christie LJ, McKay FJ, Purdie CA, Robertson KE, Topping DA, Levison DA. A simple and rapid approach to the problem of tissue contamination and patient identity in histopathologic specimens. Human pathology 2006. link 57 Soltani A, Moayyeri A. What constitutes clinical evidence? A dynamic approach to clinical diagnosis. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien 2005. link 58 Jenkins TM, Sciscione AC, Wapner RJ, Sarto GE. Training in chorionic villus sampling: limited experience for US fellows. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2004. link 59 Garel M, Gosme-Seguret S, Kaminski M, Cuttini M. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenatal diagnosis 2002. link 60 McNeely MD. The use of expert systems for improving test use and enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis. Clinics in laboratory medicine 2002. link00010-5) 61 Wilkinson M. Microsystems: applications in diagnostic and monitoring devices. Medical device technology 2000. link 62 Wallis F. Inventing diagnosis: Theophilus' De urinis in the classroom. Dynamis (Granada, Spain) 2000. link 63 Fontanarosa PB. An evidence based approach to diagnostic testing in emergency medicine. Emergency medicine clinics of North America 1999. link70043-2) 64 Smith JF, Bergmann M, Gildersleeve R, Allen R. A simple model for learning stereotactic skills in ultrasound-guided amniocentesis. Obstetrics and gynecology 1998. link 65 Kisner HJ. The gray zone. Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association 1998. link 66 Green JM. Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1995. link 67 Higgins C. An introduction to the examination of specimens. Nursing times 1994. link 68 Hassebrock F, Johnson PE, Bullemer P, Fox PW, Moller JH. When less is more: representation and selective memory in expert problem solving. The American journal of psychology 1993. link 69 Lakshminarayana P, Janardhan K, David HS. Anthropometry for syndromology. Indian journal of pediatrics 1991. link 70 Haber MH. Pisse prophecy: a brief history of urinalysis. Clinics in laboratory medicine 1988. link 71 Fahy MJ, Lippman A. Prenatal diagnosis and the Canadian collaborative randomized trial of chorionic villi sampling: the physician's view. American journal of medical genetics 1988. link 72 Weber JE. Applications of statistical analysis in diagnostic histopathology and cytopathology. Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology 1988. link 73 Beautyman W. The pathologist and the diagnostic process. With a note on Edelman's Group Selection Theory and the Darwinian Computer. Clinics in laboratory medicine 1984. link